On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 10:24:42 +0200 Stefan Roese <[email protected]> wrote: > > Thanks for applying this! However, I think the "[PATCH 8/8]: Command > > improvements for ubifs" patch should also be uncontroversial: > > Yes. And I already acked it on the list. Please note that I'm "only" the co- > custodian for the UBI repository. We have no UBIFS custodian. So it needs to > get into mainline via Wolfgang.
Ah, OK! I simply assumed UBI/UBIFS maintenance went together and that it simply got missed. > > To use ubifs on ARM, I also need the rest of the patch series > > > > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-July/055594.html > > > > but I haven't seen any comments on that so far. > > No comments doesn't have to be a bad sign. So nobody has something to > complain > about them. In fact I think your patches are good. So I'll probably send a > few > acked-by's soon. Well my worry with the series is that it touches pretty much all architectures, which I haven't been able to test. So that is basically where I'd like some feedback. // Simon _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list [email protected] http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
