On 04/19/2016 07:01 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Marek,
>
> Am 18.04.2016 um 19:52 schrieb Marek Vasut:
>> On 04/18/2016 05:46 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 05:37:02PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 04/18/2016 05:31 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 12:41:
Hello Marek,
Am 18.04.2016 um 19:52 schrieb Marek Vasut:
On 04/18/2016 05:46 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 05:37:02PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 04/18/2016 05:31 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 12:41:02PM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Fix following DTC warnings fo
Hello Tom,
Am 18.04.2016 um 17:46 schrieb Tom Rini:
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 05:37:02PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
On 04/18/2016 05:31 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 12:41:02PM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Fix following DTC warnings for all socfpga boards:
We're going to defer o
On 04/18/2016 05:46 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 05:37:02PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 04/18/2016 05:31 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 12:41:02PM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>>>
Fix following DTC warnings for all socfpga boards:
>>>
>>> We're going to de
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 05:37:02PM +0200, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 04/18/2016 05:31 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 12:41:02PM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> >
> >> Fix following DTC warnings for all socfpga boards:
> >
> > We're going to defer on this patch for now, thanks.
> >
>
On 04/18/2016 05:31 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 12:41:02PM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>
>> Fix following DTC warnings for all socfpga boards:
>
> We're going to defer on this patch for now, thanks.
>
Can you elaborate please?
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
___
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 12:41:02PM +0200, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Fix following DTC warnings for all socfpga boards:
We're going to defer on this patch for now, thanks.
--
Tom
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Bo
On 04/18/2016 01:20 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Marek,
>
> Am 18.04.2016 um 12:36 schrieb Marek Vasut:
>> On 04/18/2016 06:55 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>>> Hello Marek,
>>>
>>> Am 15.04.2016 um 16:18 schrieb Marek Vasut:
On 04/15/2016 12:41 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Fix following
Hello Marek,
Am 18.04.2016 um 12:36 schrieb Marek Vasut:
On 04/18/2016 06:55 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Marek,
Am 15.04.2016 um 16:18 schrieb Marek Vasut:
On 04/15/2016 12:41 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Fix following DTC warnings for all socfpga boards:
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
On 04/18/2016 12:00 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>>> Hi!
>>>
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/usbphy@0 has a unit name,
but no reg property
>>>
>>> I don't know who produces the warnings, but perhaps fix the tool,
>>> instead?
>>
>> This warnigns poping up with new DTC compil
On 04/18/2016 06:55 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Hello Marek,
>
> Am 15.04.2016 um 16:18 schrieb Marek Vasut:
>> On 04/15/2016 12:41 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
>>> Fix following DTC warnings for all socfpga boards:
>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /memory has a reg or ranges
>>> property, but
Hello Pavel,
Am 18.04.2016 um 12:00 schrieb Pavel Machek:
Hi!
Hi!
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/usbphy@0 has a unit name,
but no reg property
I don't know who produces the warnings, but perhaps fix the tool,
instead?
This warnigns poping up with new DTC compilers, introduced
Hi!
> >Hi!
> >
> >>Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/usbphy@0 has a unit name,
> >> but no reg property
> >
> >I don't know who produces the warnings, but perhaps fix the tool,
> >instead?
>
> This warnigns poping up with new DTC compilers, introduced from dtc
> commit:
IMO compiler shou
Hello Pavel,
Am 17.04.2016 um 23:55 schrieb Pavel Machek:
Hi!
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/usbphy@0 has a unit name,
but no reg property
I don't know who produces the warnings, but perhaps fix the tool,
instead?
This warnigns poping up with new DTC compilers, introduced from
Hello Marek,
Am 15.04.2016 um 16:18 schrieb Marek Vasut:
On 04/15/2016 12:41 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Fix following DTC warnings for all socfpga boards:
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /memory has a reg or ranges property, but
no unit name
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/clkmgr@f
Hi!
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/usbphy@0 has a unit name,
> but no reg property
I don't know who produces the warnings, but perhaps fix the tool,
instead?
> @@ -9,5 +9,5 @@
> #size-cells = <1>;
> chosen { };
> aliases { };
> - memory { device_type = "memory"
On 04/15/2016 12:41 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
> Fix following DTC warnings for all socfpga boards:
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /memory has a reg or ranges property, but
> no unit name
> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/main_pll has
> a reg or ranges proper
Fix following DTC warnings for all socfpga boards:
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /memory has a reg or ranges property, but
no unit name
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/main_pll has a
reg or ranges property, but no unit name
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
18 matches
Mail list logo
