On 04/18/2016 12:00 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/usbphy@0 has a unit name,
>>>> but no reg property
>>>
>>> I don't know who produces the warnings, but perhaps fix the tool,
>>> instead?
>>
>> This warnigns poping up with new DTC compilers, introduced from dtc
>> commit:
>
> IMO compiler should be fixed.
The commit is pretty clear on why the compiler is right.
Do you have a counter-argument ?
>> ePAPR 1.1 section 2.2.1.1 "Node Name Requirements" specifies
>> that any
>
> This is arm. This is not powerpc. It is 2016, not 1997.
Old does not imply incorrect.
>>>> - usbphy0: usbphy@0 {
>>>> + usbphy0: usbphy {
>>>> #phy-cells = <0>;
>>>> compatible = "usb-nop-xceiv";
>>>> status = "okay";
>>>
>>> And this sounds like a bug waiting to happen..
>>
>> Better fix would be to add the reg property .. could you help me?
>
> Introduce fake "reg" property to shut up warning?
>
> I guess this should be solved on the kernel list
Bringing it up on the DT discuss is a good idea.
> and I believe the
> warnings are wrong.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pavel
>
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
