On 04/18/2016 12:00 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > >>> Hi! >>> >>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/usbphy@0 has a unit name, >>>> but no reg property >>> >>> I don't know who produces the warnings, but perhaps fix the tool, >>> instead? >> >> This warnigns poping up with new DTC compilers, introduced from dtc >> commit: > > IMO compiler should be fixed.
The commit is pretty clear on why the compiler is right. Do you have a counter-argument ? >> ePAPR 1.1 section 2.2.1.1 "Node Name Requirements" specifies >> that any > > This is arm. This is not powerpc. It is 2016, not 1997. Old does not imply incorrect. >>>> - usbphy0: usbphy@0 { >>>> + usbphy0: usbphy { >>>> #phy-cells = <0>; >>>> compatible = "usb-nop-xceiv"; >>>> status = "okay"; >>> >>> And this sounds like a bug waiting to happen.. >> >> Better fix would be to add the reg property .. could you help me? > > Introduce fake "reg" property to shut up warning? > > I guess this should be solved on the kernel list Bringing it up on the DT discuss is a good idea. > and I believe the > warnings are wrong. > > Best regards, > > Pavel > -- Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot