On 04/15/2016 12:41 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote: > Fix following DTC warnings for all socfpga boards: > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /memory has a reg or ranges property, but > no unit name > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/main_pll has > a reg or ranges property, but no unit name > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node > /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/main_pll/mpuclk has a reg or ranges property, but > no unit name > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node > /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/main_pll/mainclk has a reg or ranges property, > but no unit name > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node > /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/main_pll/dbg_base_clk has a reg or ranges > property, but no unit name > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node > /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/main_pll/main_qspi_clk has a reg or ranges > property, but no unit name > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node > /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/main_pll/main_nand_sdmmc_clk has a reg or ranges > property, but no unit name > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node > /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/main_pll/cfg_h2f_usr0_clk has a reg or ranges > property, but no unit name > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll > has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node > /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll/emac0_clk has a reg or ranges > property, but no unit name > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node > /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll/emac1_clk has a reg or ranges > property, but no unit name > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node > /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll/per_qsi_clk has a reg or ranges > property, but no unit name > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node > /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll/per_nand_mmc_clk has a reg or ranges > property, but no unit name > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node > /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll/per_base_clk has a reg or ranges > property, but no unit name > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node > /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll/h2f_usr1_clk has a reg or ranges > property, but no unit name > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/sdram_pll has > a reg or ranges property, but no unit name > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node > /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/sdram_pll/ddr_dqs_clk has a reg or ranges > property, but no unit name > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node > /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/sdram_pll/ddr_2x_dqs_clk has a reg or ranges > property, but no unit name > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node > /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/sdram_pll/ddr_dq_clk has a reg or ranges > property, but no unit name > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node > /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/sdram_pll/h2f_usr2_clk has a reg or ranges > property, but no unit name > Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/usbphy@0 has a unit name, but no reg > property
How come Linux isn't affected by this ? > Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <h...@denx.de> > --- > This warnings pop up with the DTC compiler: > $ /tmp/dtc/dtc -v > Version: DTC 1.4.1-gbeef80b8 > > This fixes the compile warnings for: > https://travis-ci.org/u-boot/u-boot/jobs/122880430 > > see: > https://travis-ci.org/hsdenx/u-boot/jobs/123238779 > > arch/arm/dts/skeleton.dtsi | 2 +- > arch/arm/dts/socfpga.dtsi | 40 > +++++++++++++------------- > arch/arm/dts/socfpga_arria5_socdk.dts | 2 +- > arch/arm/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_nano_soc.dts | 2 +- > arch/arm/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_mcvevk.dts | 2 +- > arch/arm/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_socdk.dts | 2 +- > arch/arm/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_sockit.dts | 2 +- > arch/arm/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_socrates.dts | 2 +- > 8 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/skeleton.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/skeleton.dtsi > index b41d241..a20da0a 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/dts/skeleton.dtsi > +++ b/arch/arm/dts/skeleton.dtsi > @@ -9,5 +9,5 @@ > #size-cells = <1>; > chosen { }; > aliases { }; > - memory { device_type = "memory"; reg = <0 0>; }; > + memory@0 { device_type = "memory"; reg = <0 0>; }; > }; Can you split this into skeleton.dtsi patch and socfpga-only patch? That'd help containing the changes. Thanks! Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
