On 04/18/2016 01:20 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote: > Hello Marek, > > Am 18.04.2016 um 12:36 schrieb Marek Vasut: >> On 04/18/2016 06:55 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote: >>> Hello Marek, >>> >>> Am 15.04.2016 um 16:18 schrieb Marek Vasut: >>>> On 04/15/2016 12:41 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote: >>>>> Fix following DTC warnings for all socfpga boards: >>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /memory has a reg or ranges >>>>> property, but no unit name >>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node >>>>> /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/main_pll has a reg or ranges property, >>>>> but no unit name >>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node >>>>> /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/main_pll/mpuclk has a reg or ranges >>>>> property, but no unit name >>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node >>>>> /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/main_pll/mainclk has a reg or ranges >>>>> property, but no unit name >>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node >>>>> /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/main_pll/dbg_base_clk has a reg or ranges >>>>> property, but no unit name >>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node >>>>> /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/main_pll/main_qspi_clk has a reg or >>>>> ranges property, but no unit name >>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node >>>>> /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/main_pll/main_nand_sdmmc_clk has a reg or >>>>> ranges property, but no unit name >>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node >>>>> /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/main_pll/cfg_h2f_usr0_clk has a reg or >>>>> ranges property, but no unit name >>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node >>>>> /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll has a reg or ranges property, >>>>> but no unit name >>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node >>>>> /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll/emac0_clk has a reg or ranges >>>>> property, but no unit name >>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node >>>>> /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll/emac1_clk has a reg or ranges >>>>> property, but no unit name >>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node >>>>> /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll/per_qsi_clk has a reg or >>>>> ranges property, but no unit name >>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node >>>>> /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll/per_nand_mmc_clk has a reg or >>>>> ranges property, but no unit name >>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node >>>>> /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll/per_base_clk has a reg or >>>>> ranges property, but no unit name >>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node >>>>> /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll/h2f_usr1_clk has a reg or >>>>> ranges property, but no unit name >>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node >>>>> /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/sdram_pll has a reg or ranges property, >>>>> but no unit name >>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node >>>>> /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/sdram_pll/ddr_dqs_clk has a reg or ranges >>>>> property, but no unit name >>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node >>>>> /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/sdram_pll/ddr_2x_dqs_clk has a reg or >>>>> ranges property, but no unit name >>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node >>>>> /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/sdram_pll/ddr_dq_clk has a reg or ranges >>>>> property, but no unit name >>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node >>>>> /soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/sdram_pll/h2f_usr2_clk has a reg or >>>>> ranges property, but no unit name >>>>> Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/usbphy@0 has a unit name, >>>>> but no reg property >>>> >>>> How come Linux isn't affected by this ? >>> >>> I think linux is also affected! >> >> You might want to bring it up on the LKML, like Pavel suggested. > > Do we have the same DTS as linux? > (If so, isn;t it a bad idea to hold the files on 2 places?)
The DTS should be very similar I hope. U-Boot has QSPI nodes and the u-boot,dm-pre-reloc properties. -- Best regards, Marek Vasut _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
