Hello Marek,
Am 18.04.2016 um 12:36 schrieb Marek Vasut:
On 04/18/2016 06:55 AM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Hello Marek,
Am 15.04.2016 um 16:18 schrieb Marek Vasut:
On 04/15/2016 12:41 PM, Heiko Schocher wrote:
Fix following DTC warnings for all socfpga boards:
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /memory has a reg or ranges
property, but no unit name
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
/soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/main_pll has a reg or ranges property,
but no unit name
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
/soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/main_pll/mpuclk has a reg or ranges
property, but no unit name
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
/soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/main_pll/mainclk has a reg or ranges
property, but no unit name
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
/soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/main_pll/dbg_base_clk has a reg or ranges
property, but no unit name
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
/soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/main_pll/main_qspi_clk has a reg or
ranges property, but no unit name
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
/soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/main_pll/main_nand_sdmmc_clk has a reg or
ranges property, but no unit name
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
/soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/main_pll/cfg_h2f_usr0_clk has a reg or
ranges property, but no unit name
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
/soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll has a reg or ranges property,
but no unit name
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
/soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll/emac0_clk has a reg or ranges
property, but no unit name
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
/soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll/emac1_clk has a reg or ranges
property, but no unit name
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
/soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll/per_qsi_clk has a reg or
ranges property, but no unit name
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
/soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll/per_nand_mmc_clk has a reg or
ranges property, but no unit name
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
/soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll/per_base_clk has a reg or
ranges property, but no unit name
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
/soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/periph_pll/h2f_usr1_clk has a reg or
ranges property, but no unit name
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
/soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/sdram_pll has a reg or ranges property,
but no unit name
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
/soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/sdram_pll/ddr_dqs_clk has a reg or ranges
property, but no unit name
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
/soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/sdram_pll/ddr_2x_dqs_clk has a reg or
ranges property, but no unit name
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
/soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/sdram_pll/ddr_dq_clk has a reg or ranges
property, but no unit name
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node
/soc/clkmgr@ffd04000/clocks/sdram_pll/h2f_usr2_clk has a reg or
ranges property, but no unit name
Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): Node /soc/usbphy@0 has a unit name,
but no reg property
How come Linux isn't affected by this ?
I think linux is also affected!
You might want to bring it up on the LKML, like Pavel suggested.
Do we have the same DTS as linux?
(If so, isn;t it a bad idea to hold the files on 2 places?)
bye,
Heiko
Signed-off-by: Heiko Schocher <h...@denx.de>
---
This warnings pop up with the DTC compiler:
$ /tmp/dtc/dtc -v
Version: DTC 1.4.1-gbeef80b8
This fixes the compile warnings for:
https://travis-ci.org/u-boot/u-boot/jobs/122880430
see:
https://travis-ci.org/hsdenx/u-boot/jobs/123238779
arch/arm/dts/skeleton.dtsi | 2 +-
arch/arm/dts/socfpga.dtsi | 40
+++++++++++++-------------
arch/arm/dts/socfpga_arria5_socdk.dts | 2 +-
arch/arm/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_de0_nano_soc.dts | 2 +-
arch/arm/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_mcvevk.dts | 2 +-
arch/arm/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_socdk.dts | 2 +-
arch/arm/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_sockit.dts | 2 +-
arch/arm/dts/socfpga_cyclone5_socrates.dts | 2 +-
8 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/skeleton.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/skeleton.dtsi
index b41d241..a20da0a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/dts/skeleton.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/dts/skeleton.dtsi
@@ -9,5 +9,5 @@
#size-cells = <1>;
chosen { };
aliases { };
- memory { device_type = "memory"; reg = <0 0>; };
+ memory@0 { device_type = "memory"; reg = <0 0>; };
};
Can you split this into skeleton.dtsi patch and socfpga-only patch?
That'd help containing the changes.
Yes, of course!
Please hold the patch for a bit, see above.
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
_______________________________________________
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
