[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] omap3: bugfix in timer on rollover

2016-06-06 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/timer.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/timer.c b/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common/timer.c index 032bd2c..49e3a97 100644 --- a/arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap-common

[U-Boot] arm: ti: SF commands raise watchdog reset

2016-06-02 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Hello, I have an issue with sf commands. If a command takes longer than the defined HW Watchdog timeout, the board resets. My Platform is: Board: Custom CPU: Sitara AM3357ZCZ Flash: Micron N25Q256A13E1240F Serial NOR Flash U-Boot: repoduced on 2016.01 and 2016.03 Commands to reproduce the pro

[U-Boot] [PATCH V3 1/1] arm: at91: reworked meesc board support

2015-11-01 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- Changes in V2: - Fetched again and created patch against current master Changes in V3: - None, just resent using 'git send-email' board/esd/meesc/meesc.c | 20 include/configs/me

[U-Boot] [PATCH V2 1/1] arm: at91: reworked meesc board support

2015-10-29 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- Changes in V2: - Fetched again and created patch against current master board/esd/meesc/meesc.c | 20 include/configs/meesc.h | 42 -- 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] arm: at91: reworked meesc board support

2015-10-29 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- board/esd/meesc/meesc.c | 20 include/configs/meesc.h | 45 +++-- 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/board/esd/meesc/meesc.c b/board/esd/meesc/meesc.c index c5994e0

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] arm: at91: convert meesc board to generic board

2015-08-30 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- include/configs/meesc.h | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/include/configs/meesc.h b/include/configs/meesc.h index e5bb873..ab6c910 100644 --- a/include/configs/meesc.h +++ b/include/configs/meesc.h @@ -56,6 +56,8 @@ #define

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 17/45] arm: Remove meesc and meesc_dataflash boards

2015-08-30 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
On 31.08.2015 at 03:19 Simon Glass wrote: These boards have not been converted to generic board by the deadline. Remove them. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass --- arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig| 5 - board/esd/meesc/Kconfig | 12 -- board/esd/meesc/MAINTAINERS | 7 - bo

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] at91: modified NAND flash timing on meesc board

2012-02-19 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Hi Albert, Albert ARIBAUD wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Le 25/01/2012 14:19, Daniel Gorsulowski a écrit : >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski >> --- >> board/esd/meesc/meesc.c |8 >> 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >>

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] at91: modified NAND flash timing on otc570 board

2012-01-25 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- board/esd/otc570/otc570.c |8 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/board/esd/otc570/otc570.c b/board/esd/otc570/otc570.c index 5dded41..0c12b66 100644 --- a/board/esd/otc570/otc570.c +++ b/board/esd/otc570/otc570.c

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] at91: modified NAND flash timing on meesc board

2012-01-25 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- board/esd/meesc/meesc.c |8 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/board/esd/meesc/meesc.c b/board/esd/meesc/meesc.c index 4882ffc..9dd4375 100644 --- a/board/esd/meesc/meesc.c +++ b/board/esd/meesc/meesc.c @@ -73,20

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] at91: defined mach-types for otc570 board in board config file

2011-10-31 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
header file in include/configs/." Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- include/configs/otc570.h |7 +++ 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/otc570.h b/include/configs/otc570.h index e2c2eda..c068aa0 100644 --- a/include/configs/otc570.h +++

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] at91: defined mach-types for meesc board in board config file

2011-10-31 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
header file in include/configs/." Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- include/configs/meesc.h |8 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/meesc.h b/include/configs/meesc.h index a2b55d5..ea40290 100644 --- a/include/configs/meesc.h +++ b/incl

Re: [U-Boot] Nand: Uboot-Environment at bad block

2011-08-04 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Arno Steffen wrote: > In one of my devices, uboot-environment is located at a bad block. > "save > Saving Environment to NAND... > Erasing Nand... > Skipping bad block at 0x000c > > Writing to Nand... FAILED!" > > In my memory mapping I have already reseverd 2blocks. > How can I setup uboot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH-V2 2/2] at91: reworked support for otc570 board

2011-04-19 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Hello Reinhard, Reinhard Meyer wrote: > Am 18.04.2011 16:15, schrieb Daniel Gorsulowski: >> The otc570 board support was broken. Within this opportunity, I completely >> reworked the board files. >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski >> --- >>

[U-Boot] [PATCH-V2 2/2] at91: reworked support for otc570 board

2011-04-18 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
The otc570 board support was broken. Within this opportunity, I completely reworked the board files. Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- This patch is based on u-boot-atmel/rework101229 branch (minus the last 5 patches) plus the 'at91: fixed at91sam9263 system file' patch in u-boot-

[U-Boot] [PATCH-V2 1/2] at91: reworked support for meesc board

2011-04-18 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
The meesc board support was broken. Within this opportunity, I completely reworked the board files. Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- This patch is based on u-boot-atmel/rework101229 branch (minus the last 5 patches) plus the 'at91: fixed at91sam9263 system file' patch in u-boot-

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] at91: reworked support for otc570 board

2011-04-15 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
After relocation rework, the meesc and otc570 board support was broken. This patch will fix the otc570 board. Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- This patch is based on u-boot-atmel/rework101229 branch (minus the last 5 patches) plus the 'at91: fixed at91sam9263 system file' patch

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] at91: reworked support for meesc board

2011-04-13 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
After relocation rework, the meesc and otc570 board support was broken. This patch will fix the meesc board. Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- This patch is based on u-boot-atmel/rework101229 branch (minus the last 5 patches) plus the 'at91: fixed at91sam9263 system file' patch

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot support for board(s) meesc, otc570

2011-01-24 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Hello Reinhard, ... >> >> Check that your AT91Bootstrap loads u-boot to a sane address not at the >> very end >> of DRAM, and that CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE is exactly the address where >> AT91Bootstrap >> loads u-boot. (I changed AT91Bootstrap to load u-boot to the very begin >> of DRAM >> for our boa

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] at91: fixed 'esd gmbh' meesc and otc570 boards

2011-01-21 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Reinhard Meyer wrote: > Dear Daniel Gorsulowski, >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski >> ... >> -gd->bd->bi_dram[0].start = PHYS_SDRAM; >> -gd->bd->bi_dram[0].size = get_ram_size((long *) PHYS_SDRAM, (1<< 27)); >> +gd->bd->

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot support for board(s) meesc, otc570

2011-01-21 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Hello Reinhard, ... >> >> Back to the problem... >> In my opinion, my USART configuration is correct. I still have no idea, >> why there is no output on DBGU. > > I am at a loss there, too. > > Which USART is the output coming from instead? Is it really console output > or maybe some other, indepe

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot support for board(s) meesc, otc570

2011-01-21 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Hello Reinhard, Reinhard Meyer wrote: > Dear Daniel Gorsulowski, >> Today I found out by GPIO debugging, that U-Boot seems to boot but prints >> its startup messages to wrong USART with proper baudrate. I'll try to >> find out, why there is no output on DBGU. > &g

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] at91: fixed at91sam9263 system file

2011-01-21 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91sam9263_devices.c | 55 +++-- 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91sam9263_devices.c b/arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91sam9263_devices.c index

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot support for board(s) meesc, otc570

2011-01-21 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Dear Reinhard, Reinhard Meyer wrote: > Dear Daniel Gorsulowski, >> Hello Reinhard, >> >> Reinhard Meyer wrote: >>> Dear Daniel Gorsulowski, > > ... > >>> The at91sam9260(9xe)ek board builds fine and works. >> >> I can confirm that. &g

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] at91: fixed 'esd gmbh' meesc and otc570 boards

2011-01-21 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- There is still a bug in USART config. This patch is for reviewing only! board/esd/meesc/config.mk |1 - board/esd/meesc/meesc.c| 39 +- board/esd/otc570/config.mk |1 - board/esd/otc570/otc570.c | 51 +++-- boards.cfg

Re: [U-Boot] U-Boot support for board(s) meesc, otc570

2011-01-19 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Hello Reinhard, Reinhard Meyer wrote: > Dear Daniel Gorsulowski, >> Hello Albert, >> >> Albert ARIBAUD wrote: >>> Le 18/01/2011 10:27, Daniel Gorsulowski a écrit : >>>> Hello again! >>> >>> Hi Daniel, >>> >>>>

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 3/3] at91: Enabeling USB host on meesc board

2010-08-09 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
There was an redesign, so USB is available now. Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- v2: Nothing changed but commit message v3: nothing changed, just resend to cohere patch series board/esd/meesc/meesc.c |6 +- include/configs/meesc.h | 13 - 2 files changed, 17

[U-Boot] [PATCH v5 2/3] at91: Update meesc board to new SoC access

2010-08-09 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
* convert meesc board to use c stucture SoC access * change gpio access to at91_gpio syntax * moved CONFIG_SYS_HZ below board and cpu defines (purely cosmetic) Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- v2: fixed copyright changing error according to Wolfgangs hint v3: removed some

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 1/3] at91: Defined main clock frequency on esd at91 boards

2010-08-09 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Autodetection is undesired now Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- v2: fixed copyright changing error according to Wolfgangs hint v3: nothing changed, just resend to cohere patch series include/configs/meesc.h |3 ++- include/configs/otc570.h |1 + 2 files changed, 3

[U-Boot] [PATCH-V4] at91: Update meesc board to new SoC access

2010-07-27 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
* convert meesc board to use c stucture SoC access * change gpio access to at91_gpio syntax * moved CONFIG_SYS_HZ below board and cpu defines (purely cosmetic) Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- v2: fixed copyright changing error according to Wolfgangs hint v3: removed some

[U-Boot] [PATCH-V3] at91: Update meesc board to new SoC access

2010-07-19 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
* convert meesc board to use c stucture SoC access * change gpio access to at91_gpio syntax * moved CONFIG_SYS_HZ below board and cpu defines (purely cosmetic) Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- v2: fixed copyright changing error according to Wolfgangs hint v3: removed some

[U-Boot] [PATCH-V2 2/3] at91: Update meesc board to new SoC access

2010-07-15 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
* convert meesc board to use c stucture SoC access * change gpio access to at91_gpio syntax * moved CONFIG_SYS_HZ below board and cpu defines (purely cosmetic) Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- v2: fixed copyright changing error according to Wolfgangs hint board/esd/meesc/meesc.c

[U-Boot] [PATCH-V2 1/3] at91: Defined main clock frequency on esd at91 boards

2010-07-15 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Autodetection is undesired now Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- v2: fixed copyright changing error according to Wolfgangs hint include/configs/meesc.h |3 ++- include/configs/otc570.h |1 + 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs

[U-Boot] [PATCH-V2 3/3] at91: Enabeling USB host on meesc board

2010-07-15 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
There was an redesign, so USB is available now. Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- v2: Nothing changed but commit message Note: This patch depends on 'at91: Update meesc board to new SoC access' patch! board/esd/meesc/meesc.c |6 +- include/configs/mees

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] at91: Update meesc board to new SoC access

2010-07-08 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
* convert meesc board to use c stucture SoC access * change gpio access to at91_gpio syntax * moved CONFIG_SYS_HZ below board and cpu defines (purely cosmetic) Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- board/esd/meesc/meesc.c | 118 --- include/configs

[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/3] at91: Enabeling USB host on meesc board

2010-07-08 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
There was an redesign, so USB is available now. Note: This patch depends on 'at91: Update meesc board to new SoC access' patch! Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- board/esd/meesc/meesc.c |6 +- include/configs/meesc.h | 13 - 2 files changed, 17

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/3] at91: Defined main clock frequency on esd at91 boards

2010-07-08 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Autodetection is undesired now Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- include/configs/meesc.h |9 + include/configs/otc570.h |1 + 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/configs/meesc.h b/include/configs/meesc.h index e085f4a..d3cc582 100644 --- a

Re: [U-Boot] Use of deprecated CONFIG_CMD_AUTOSCRIPT

2010-03-17 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Hello Wolfgang, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > > Hello, > > the following boards maintained by you stioll reference the deprecated > (and non-existing) CONFIG_CMD_AUTOSCRIPT. Please submit clean-up > patches to extinguish all references to AUTOSCR: > ... > meesc ... > otc570 ... I sent a

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] at91: boards cleanup for deprecated CONFIG_CMD_AUTOSCRIPT

2010-03-17 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
CONFIG_CMD_AUTOSCRIPT support is deprecated and non-existing This clean up patch removes the references for esd boards Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- include/configs/meesc.h |1 - include/configs/otc570.h |1 - 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] AT91: Update otc570 board to new SoC access

2010-03-05 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Tom wrote: > Daniel Gorsulowski wrote: >> Hello Tom >> >> Daniel Gorsulowski wrote: >>> * convert otc570 board to use c stucture SoC access >>> * change gpio access to at91_gpio syntax >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski >>>

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] AT91: Update otc570 board to new SoC access

2010-03-05 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Hello Tom Daniel Gorsulowski wrote: > * convert otc570 board to use c stucture SoC access > * change gpio access to at91_gpio syntax > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski > --- > This patch requires Jens Scharsigs new SoC access patchset. > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail

Re: [U-Boot] please unsubscribe me

2010-02-18 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Mike Norrix wrote: > This is way too much email, please unsubsubscribe me Thanks Visit http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot and unsubsubscribe yourself. ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH ARM] updates the at91 main_clock calculation

2010-02-17 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Am 16.02.2010 16:23, schrieb Tom: > Daniel Gorsulowski wrote: >> Jens Scharsig wrote: >>> * updates the conditional main_clock calculation (if AT91_MAIN_CLOCK >>> defined) to c structure SoC access >>> * add need register flags >>> >>&

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH ARM] updates the at91 main_clock calculation

2010-02-15 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
sm-arm/arch-at91/at91_pmc.h |3 +++ > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > ... Thank you, now the updated otc570 builds without errors. I didn't check, whether the board boots, but I guess it does. Regards, Daniel Gorsulowski

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/9 V4] add new CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY

2010-02-13 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Tom wrote: > Daniel Gorsulowski wrote: >> Tom wrote: >>> Daniel Gorsulowski wrote: >>>> Hello Tom, >>>> >>>> Tom wrote: >>>>> Jens Scharsig wrote: >>>>>> * add's the new temporary CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY to all

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/9 V4] add new CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY

2010-02-11 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Tom wrote: > Daniel Gorsulowski wrote: >> Hello Tom, >> >> Tom wrote: >>> Jens Scharsig wrote: >>>> * add's the new temporary CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY to all board configs >>>> This will need for backward compatiblity, while change the SoC acc

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] AT91: Update otc570 board to new SoC access

2010-02-11 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
* convert otc570 board to use c stucture SoC access * change gpio access to at91_gpio syntax Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- This patch requires Jens Scharsigs new SoC access patchset. http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-February/067424.html http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/9 V4] convert common files to new SoC access

2010-02-11 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Daniel Gorsulowski wrote: > - tmp = at91_sys_read(AT91_CKGR_MCFR); > - } while (!(tmp & AT91_PMC_MAINRDY)); > - main_clock = (tmp & AT91_PMC_MAINF) * (AT91_SLOW_CLOCK / 16); > + tmp = readl(&pmc->mcf

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/9 V4] convert common files to new SoC access

2010-02-10 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
I replaced AT91_PMC_MAINF with (0x << 0), because AT91_PMC_MAINF in not available anymore. Maybe you find a better solution... Best regards, Daniel Gorsulowski ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/9 V4] convert common files to new SoC access

2010-02-10 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Daniel Gorsulowski wrote: > Hello Jens, > > Jens Scharsig wrote: >> * add's a warning to all files, which need update to new SoC access >> * convert common files in cpu/../at91 and a lot of drivers to use >>c stucture SoC access >> >> >> Si

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/9 V4] add new CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY

2010-02-10 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
x27; undeclared (first use in this function) > clock.c:160: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > clock.c:160: error: for each function it appears in.) > > Tom This is caused by missing defines in include\configs\otc570.h: #define CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY and #define CO

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 5/9 V4] convert common files to new SoC access

2010-02-10 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
ase don't remove this include. It breaks build on AT91SAM9263 boards who have CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY enabled. (e.g. new otc570 board) > +#include > +#ifdef CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY > #include > -#include dito > +#endif > #endif > #ifdef CON

Re: [U-Boot] [STATUS] Patch status update

2010-01-26 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
-boot/74293 Still to be applied, waiting for response. Regards, Daniel Gorsulowski ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] at91: Add esd gmbh OTC570 board support

2010-01-25 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
This patch adds support for esd gmbh OTC570 board. The OTC570 is based on an Atmel AT91SAM9263 SoC. Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- v2: Applyed suggestions according to http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-January/066948.html - removed video commands they should go into

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: Add esd gmbh OTC570 board support

2010-01-25 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Hello Tom, thanks for reviewing... Tom wrote: > Daniel Gorsulowski wrote: >> This patch adds support for esd gmbh OTC570 board. >> The OTC570 is based on an Atmel AT91SAM9263 SoC. >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski > > For u-boot-video. > Maybe some

[U-Boot] [PATCH][RESEND] at91: Enable slow master clock on meesc board

2010-01-19 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Normally the processor clock has a divisor of 2. In some cases this this needs to be set to 4. Check the user has set environment mdiv to 4 to change the divisor. Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- v2: - changed and add additional comments - strengthened string comparision board/esd

Re: [U-Boot] Linux Kernel without Ethernet (missed MAC)

2010-01-19 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Hi Arno, Arno Steffen wrote: > Changing my OMAP EVM board to newest uboot 2009-11 I do have a problem > with ethernet. > Although the kernel could be loaded via tftp perfectly, the upcoming > kernel complains about invalid MAC. > > Kernel command line: mem=128M console=ttyS0,115200n8 > root=/dev/

[U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: Add esd gmbh OTC570 board support

2010-01-18 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
This patch adds support for esd gmbh OTC570 board. The OTC570 is based on an Atmel AT91SAM9263 SoC. Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- MAINTAINERS |1 + MAKEALL |1 + Makefile |3 + board/esd/otc570/Makefile| 55

[U-Boot] [PATCH resend] at91: Enable slow master clock on meesc board

2009-11-23 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
In some cases, we need low speed master clock. So depending on the "mdiv" variable, the processor clock is divided by 2 (default) or 4. Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- board/esd/meesc/meesc.c | 24 include/configs/meesc.h |1 + 2 files changed, 25

[U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: Enable slow master clock on meesc board

2009-11-03 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
In some cases, we need low speed master clock. So depending on the "mdiv" variable, the processor clock is divided by 2 (default) or 4. Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- PS: Tom, are you still temporary at91 custodian? board/esd/meesc/meesc.c | 24 +++

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4] at91: Update MEESC board support

2009-09-28 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Hello Tom, Tom wrote: > Daniel Gorsulowski wrote: >> This patch implements several updates: >> -disable CONFIG_ENV_OVERWRITE >> -add new hardware style variants and set the arch numbers appropriate >> -pass the serial# and hardware revision to the kernel >> -r

[U-Boot] [PATCH v5] at91: Update MEESC board support

2009-09-28 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
This patch implements several updates: -disable CONFIG_ENV_OVERWRITE -add new hardware style variants and set the arch numbers appropriate -pass the serial# and hardware revision to the kernel -removed unused macros from include/configs/meesc.h -fixed multiline comment style Signed-off-by: Daniel

[U-Boot] [PATCH v4] at91: Update MEESC board support

2009-09-28 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
This patch implements several updates: -disable CONFIG_ENV_OVERWRITE -add new hardware style variants and set the arch numbers appropriate -pass the serial# and hardware revision to the kernel -removed unused macros from include/configs/meesc.h -fixed multiline comment style Signed-off-by: Daniel

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3 RESEND] at91: Update MEESC board support

2009-09-21 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
This patch implements several updates: -disable CONFIG_ENV_OVERWRITE -add new hardware style variants and set the arch numbers appropriate (autodet.) -pass the serial# and hardware revision to the kernel -removed unused macros from include/configs/meesc.h Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- v2

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v3] at91: Update MEESC board support

2009-09-21 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Dear Wolfgang Denk and Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, Daniel Gorsulowski wrote: > This patch implements several updates: > -disable CONFIG_ENV_OVERWRITE > -add new hardware style variants and set the arch numbers appropriate > (autodet.) > -pass the serial# and hardware revisio

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] at91: Update MEESC board support

2009-09-11 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Dear Wolfgang Denk, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Daniel Gorsulowski, > > In message <4aa90821.1060...@esd.eu> you wrote: >>>> - /* arch number of MEESC-Board */ >>>> - gd->bd->bi_arch_number = MACH_TYPE_MEESC; >>>> + /* initialize ET1

[U-Boot] [PATCH v3] at91: Update MEESC board support

2009-09-10 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
This patch implements several updates: -disable CONFIG_ENV_OVERWRITE -add new hardware style variants and set the arch numbers appropriate (autodet.) -pass the serial# and hardware revision to the kernel -removed unused macros from include/configs/meesc.h Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- v2

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] at91: Update MEESC board support

2009-09-10 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Dear Wolfgang Denk, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Daniel Gorsulowski, > > In message <12524805241911-git-send-email-daniel.gorsulow...@esd.eu> you > wrote: >> This patch implements several updates: >> -Disable CONFIG_ENV_OVERWRITE >> -Add new hardware sty

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] at91: Update MEESC board support

2009-09-09 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Hello, Daniel Gorsulowski wrote: > Hello Wolfgang, Jean-Christophe, > > Wolfgang Denk wrote: >> Dear Daniel, >> >> In message <20090904211358.gr30...@game.jcrosoft.org> Jean-Christophe wrote: >>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_REVISION_TAG >>>> +u32

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] at91: Update MEESC board support

2009-09-09 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
This patch implements several updates: -Disable CONFIG_ENV_OVERWRITE -Add new hardware style variants and set the arch numbers appropriate (autodetect) -Pass the serial# and hardware revision to the kernel Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- board/esd/meesc/meesc.c | 74

Re: [U-Boot] How to burn new U-Boot over network

2009-09-07 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
alex889 wrote: > Hi, > I'm working on the DM365evm, > and i was wondering if there is a way to burn new U-Boot version over > network, instead of Code Composer and a JTAG? > > Thanks, > Alex Hi Alex, of course it's possible! But it depends on the location of your U-Boot. I.e. your U-Boot is loca

Re: [U-Boot] ARM mach-types.h sync request

2009-09-07 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Wolfgang Denk schrieb: > Dear Daniel Gorsulowski, > > In message <4aa0f7b2.2010...@esd.eu> you wrote: >> Hi, >> >> according to http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2008-September/040553.html >> I request an update. >> >> It is needed for MA

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] at91: Update MEESC board support

2009-09-07 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
> > Jean-Christophe means: The Etherent interface must not be always > initialized, but only when it is needed and used within U-Boot itself, > i. e. if U-boot is performing anetwork command. See also item 2 at > http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/DesignPrinciples and >

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] at91: Update MEESC board support

2009-09-04 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
This patch implements several updates: -Write the ethernet address to the EMAC module -Disable CONFIG_ENV_OVERWRITE -Add new hardware style variants and set the arch numbers appropriate (autodetect) -Pass the serial# and hardware revision to the kernel Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski

[U-Boot] ARM mach-types.h sync request

2009-09-04 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/machines/ Best regards Daniel Gorsulowski ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/2] arm nomadik: gpio and i2c

2009-07-28 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Hello Heiko, Heiko Schocher wrote: > Hello Alessandro, > > Alessandro Rubini wrote: >> This adds gpio and i2c support for the Nomadik evaluation kit. They >> are needed to turn on the LCD backlight in order to later add LCD >> support. >> >> I have one doubt and some questions on gpio: >> >> To u

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Make linking against libgcc configurable

2009-07-23 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Heiko Schocher wrote: > Hello Daniel, > Hello Heiko, First, I would like to apologize for top posting in my last 3 mails. I am anxious to avoid that in the feature. > Daniel Gorsulowski wrote: >> Sorry, it was my misstake. >> >> By c&p and applying yout patch

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Make linking against libgcc configurable

2009-07-23 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Sorry, it was my misstake. By c&p and applying yout patch I missed the changes in lib_arm/Makefile. But as i wrote, _lshrdi3.a does not compile. Daniel Daniel Gorsulowski wrote: > So i added 'GLSOBJS += _lshrdi3.S' to lib_arm/Makefile (this line is missing > in your

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Make linking against libgcc configurable

2009-07-23 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
e no explanation for that, do you have? bye, Daniel Heiko Schocher wrote: > Hello Daniel, > > Daniel Gorsulowski wrote: >> buid on meesc board (arm) is still broken. >> It's roughly the same problem, as Heiko Schocher reported in >> 4a6854b1.5000...@denx.de. But his pat

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] Make linking against libgcc configurable

2009-07-23 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Hi Wolfgang, buid on meesc board (arm) is still broken. It's roughly the same problem, as Heiko Schocher reported in 4a6854b1.5000...@denx.de. But his patch doesn't fix the problem either. dani...@debby:~/git/u-boot$ make USE_PRIVATE_LIBGCC=yes ... drivers/mtd/nand/libnand.a(nand_base.o): In func

[U-Boot] [PATCH 2/2] at91: Add esd gmbh MEESC board support

2009-06-29 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
This patch adds support for esd gmbh MEESC board. The MEESC is based on an Atmel AT91SAM9263 SoC. Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- MAINTAINERS |4 + MAKEALL |1 + Makefile|3 + board/esd/meesc/Makefile| 55

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] at91: Add CAN init function

2009-06-29 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
To enable CAN init, CONFIG_CAN has to be defined in the board config file and at91_can_hw_init() has to be called in the board specific code. CAN is available on AT91SAM9263 and AT91CAP9 SoC. Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91cap9_devices.c| 15

[U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: Add esd gmbh MEESC board support

2009-06-29 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
This patch adds support for esd gmbh MEESC board. The MEESC is based on an Atmel AT91SAM9263 SoC. Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- MAINTAINERS |4 + MAKEALL |1 + Makefile|3 + board/esd/meesc/Makefile| 55

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: Add esd gmbh MEESC board support

2009-06-29 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Daniel Gorsulowski wrote: > Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: >> >>> + >>> +int checkboard(void) >>> +{ >>> + char str[32]; >>> + char buf[32]; >>> + >>> + puts("Board: esd CAN-EtherCAT Gateway"); >&

[U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: Add CAN init function

2009-06-29 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
To enable CAN init, CONFIG_CAN has to be defined in the board config file and at91_can_hw_init() has to be called in the board specific code. CAN is available on AT91SAM9263 and AT91CAP9 SoC. Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91cap9_devices.c| 11 +++ cpu

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: Add esd gmbh MEESC board support

2009-06-28 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 12:21 Tue 23 Jun , Daniel Gorsulowski wrote: >> This patch adds support for esd gmbh MEESC board. >> The MEESC is based on an Atmel AT91SAM9263 SoC. >> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski >> --- >> >>

[U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: Add esd gmbh MEESC board support

2009-06-23 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
This patch adds support for esd gmbh MEESC board. The MEESC is based on an Atmel AT91SAM9263 SoC. Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- Jean-Christophe: This patch requires an up-to-date mach-types.h, please sync it. MAINTAINERS |4 + MAKEALL |1

Re: [U-Boot] ARM mach-types.h sync request

2009-06-22 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Daniel Gorsulowski wrote on monday, 2009-06-08, 08:25am: > Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, > > please sync include/asm-arm/mach-types.h with mach-types.h > from latest kernel source to enable support for boards > MEESC (number 2165) and OTC570 (number 2166). > > Than

[U-Boot] ARM mach-types.h sync request

2009-06-07 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Dear Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD, please sync include/asm-arm/mach-types.h with mach-types.h from latest kernel source to enable support for boards MEESC (number 2165) and OTC570 (number 2166). Thanks! Best regards, Daniel Gorsulowski ___ U-Boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: Extended soft_i2c driver for AT91SAM9263 SoC

2009-05-24 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Dear Jean-Christophe, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD schrieb: > On 13:20 Mon 18 May , Daniel Gorsulowski wrote: >> While hard_i2c support is not available >> (see http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-March/049751.html), >> this patch enables soft_i2c on AT91SAM9

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: Add support for MEESC board of esd gmbh

2009-05-24 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
ource yet. So, imho a sync request makes no sense. Unless you sync against http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/machines/download.php Is this sufficient for a sync request, or should i send a request in a separate mail? >> + /* arch number of MEESC-Board */ >> +gd->bd->bi_ar

[U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: Extended soft_i2c driver for AT91SAM9263 SoC

2009-05-18 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
While hard_i2c support is not available (see http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-March/049751.html), this patch enables soft_i2c on AT91SAM9263 SoC. Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- drivers/i2c/soft_i2c.c |5 + 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a

[U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: Add support for MEESC board of esd gmbh

2009-05-18 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
This patch is a rebase against branch arm/next and adds support for MEESC board of esd gmbh. The MEESC is based on an Atmel AT91SAM9263 SoC. Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- MAINTAINERS |4 + MAKEALL |1 + Makefile |3 + board

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] at91: Add command to control up to 3 GPIO LEDs from the console

2009-05-14 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
The folowing patch tries to fix all defects of the previous patch. The new led command is _not_ limited to 3 LEDs any more, but it is still restricted to at91 architectures. Best regards, Daniel Gorsulowski ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de

[U-Boot] [PATCH] at91: Add command to control GPIO LEDs from the console

2009-05-14 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
information. Usage: led [LED_number] [on|off] Signed-off-by: Daniel Gorsulowski --- cpu/arm926ejs/at91/Makefile |1 + cpu/arm926ejs/at91/cmd_led.c| 60 +++ cpu/arm926ejs/at91/led.c| 29 +++ doc/README.LED

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 12/13] at91: add hardware i2c drivers

2009-05-13 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
t; cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91sam9rl_i2c.c > (52%) > create mode 100644 drivers/i2c/atmel_i2c.c > create mode 100644 include/asm-arm/arch-at91/at91_twi.h > ... Do you aim to commit a new clean patch for this issue? Hard I2C support would be a really nice feature! Best regards, Daniel

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] at91: Add command to control up to 3 GPIO LEDs from the console

2009-05-07 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Wolfgang Denk schrieb: > Dear Daniel Gorsulowski, > > In message <4a02792b.8060...@esd.eu> you wrote: >>> Ummm... common is for, well, for >>common<< stuff. If this code is >>> specific to AT91 only, it should not go into common. >>> >&

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] at91: Add command to control up to 3 GPIO LEDs from the console

2009-05-07 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Hi Stefan, Stefan Roese wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > On Wednesday 06 May 2009, Daniel Gorsulowski wrote: >> This patch allows any at91 board, implementing the GPIO LED API, >> to control the LEDs from the console. >> >> led [ 1 | 2 | 3 | all ] [ on | off ] > >

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] at91: Add command to control up to 3 GPIO LEDs from the console

2009-05-06 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
Dear Wolfgang Denk, Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Daniel Gorsulowski, > > In message <1241619669338-git-send-email-daniel.gorsulow...@esd.eu> you wrote: >> This patch allows any at91 board, implementing the GPIO LED API, >> to control the LEDs from the console. >>

[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] at91: Add command to control up to 3 GPIO LEDs from the console

2009-05-06 Thread Daniel Gorsulowski
b/common/cmd_led.c new file mode 100644 index 000..f914d2d --- /dev/null +++ b/common/cmd_led.c @@ -0,0 +1,86 @@ +/* + * (C) Copyright 2008 + * Ulf Samuelsson + * + * (C) Copyright 2009 + * Daniel Gorsulowski + * esd electronic system design gmbh + * + * See file CREDITS for list of people

  1   2   >