Dear Reinhard, Reinhard Meyer wrote: > Dear Daniel Gorsulowski, >> Hello Reinhard, >> >> Reinhard Meyer wrote: >>> Dear Daniel Gorsulowski, > > ... > >>> The at91sam9260(9xe)ek board builds fine and works. >> >> I can confirm that. >> >>> Use that as a template or reference what to do. >>> You should *only* need to adapt board/*/files and your configs/<board>.h >>> files. And of course updated entries in boards.cfg. >> >> Not quiet. I had to fix arch/arm/cpu/arm926ejs/at91/at91sam9263_devices.c >> additionally. > Yes, of course... I had only "reworked" the 9260 variant yet. You should > need > to change it similarly to at91sam9260_devices.c... >> >> With my adoptions, my boards builds fine. But they do not boot. >> Can you really confirm that the at91sam9260ek board boots? I have no >> chance to debug my problems, so I have no idea, why my boards does not >> boot. > Yes it does. > > What exactly does "does not boot" mean? No message at all?
Yes, sorry for indefinite description... There is no message at all, except for bootrom 'RomBOOT' promt. > > Check that your AT91Bootstrap loads u-boot to a sane address not at the > very end > of DRAM, and that CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE is exactly the address where > AT91Bootstrap > loads u-boot. (I changed AT91Bootstrap to load u-boot to the very begin > of DRAM > for our boards.) > I neither change the AT91Bootstrap nor the CONFIG_SYS_TEXT_BASE address, so the problem must be located elsewhere. Today I found out by GPIO debugging, that U-Boot seems to boot but prints its startup messages to wrong USART with proper baudrate. I'll try to find out, why there is no output on DBGU. >> >> Nevertheless, should I send my patches for reviewing? >> > > Of course. We might see something that helps you. Ok, I'll do so. > > Best Regards, > Reinhard > > > Best regards, Daniel Gorsulowski _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
