Tom wrote: > Daniel Gorsulowski wrote: >> Tom wrote: >>> Daniel Gorsulowski wrote: >>>> Hello Tom, >>>> >>>> Tom wrote: >>>>> Jens Scharsig wrote: >>>>>> * add's the new temporary CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY to all board configs >>>>>> This will need for backward compatiblity, while change the SoC access >>>>>> to c structures. If CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY is defined, the deprecated >>>>>> SoC is used. ... >> You probably recognized that I did not sent a patch with CONFIG_AT91_LEGACY >> support but I updated the otc570 board to new SoC access. >> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-February/067691.html >> I guess, this is the best solution. >> > > Daniel, > I still see an error wrt otc570. > > Jens, > I have pushed your patchset of around 2/4 to arm/master. > > There will be an error in the otc570 build. > Tom >
If you are talking about errors in clock.c, I know about them. Please take a look at the comments in my otc570 patch. Regarding to Jens patchset I wrote: > Apart from a tiny change, I give them an ACK. See > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-February/067674.html > and > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2010-February/067680.html Best regards Daniel Gorsulowski _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
