Re: Apache 2.0

Another update - I got mod_jk up and running, it can serve a simple servlet or a jsp page. There are few bugs for some pages, I'll work on it tommorow. Costin > > Ops, sorry about that. > > Now it compiles - but crashes with SIGSEGV in reinit_scoreboard. > I'll try with dexter, it seems

[PATCH] SECURITY FIX (Re: Tomcat 3.2.1 JSP Source Disclosure)

This patch fixes Tomcat 3.2.1 security problem that Yoshiyuki Karezaki (cf. BugRat Report #513) and Robert Ellis (cf. "Tomcat 3.2.1 JSP Source Disclosure") reported. At the same time, this patch fixes the bug Mark Brouwer reported (cf. "[BUG] getProtocol() method on ServletRequest includes CRLF

Re: Tomcat3.2 final doesn't support user defined MIME type

> Bug: > Tomcat3.2 doesn't support user defined MIME type in added > "TOMCAT_HOME\conf\web.xml". Instead, it returns text/plain. You should set the MIME types in the webapplication's web.xml. This has been a source of confusion in the past, and a big mistake - if you want portable web applicati

Re: Apache 2.0

Ops, sorry about that. Now it compiles - but crashes with SIGSEGV in reinit_scoreboard. I'll try with dexter, it seems it may work without a scoreboard , and I'll also try again to compile a file-based scoreboad. Damn, Linux was supposed to be a bit better... What's very strange is that all th

Tomcat3.2 final doesn't support user defined MIME type

Hi, Tomcat Developers: Excuse me if this bug has been already reported. I also reported this bug into Bugrat system. ID629. Bug: Tomcat3.2 doesn't support user defined MIME type in added "TOMCAT_HOME\conf\web.xml". Instead, it returns text/plain. Environment: Windows NT, Service Pack 5. Pan

BugRat Report #629 has been filed.

Bug report #629 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #629 Details. Project: Tomcat Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: high Severity: critical C

Re: BugRat Report #628 JVM 1.3 and NT service logout

This sounds to me like the infamous NT service logout bug in the 1.3 JVM and 1.x HotSpot JVMs. Can you check out this Bug report at Sun and see if it fits the bill?: http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/bugParade/bugs/4323062.html Scott Stirling Allaire On 19 Dec 2000 22:52:20 -0600, BugRa

Re: *beaten and battered*: JAASRealm works!

As promised, here's the code, plus docs, build.xml, etc.. http://www.amberarcher.com/apache/tomcat_contrib/tomcat_contrib-0.1.zip Feedback welcome. I probably won't be able to get up HTML docs to supplement the text docs in the package until after Xmas. I'll set up the "tomcat_contrib" project

BugRat Report #628 has been filed.

Bug report #628 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #628 Details. Project: Tomcat Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: high Severity: serious Co

TC 3.2 - Better logging messages when something bad happens?

While doing some development, I started getting this Exception: org.apache.jasper.JasperException: error in invoking method at org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspRuntimeLibrary.createTypedArray(JspRuntimeLibra ry.java:353) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.JspRuntimeLibrary.introspecthelper(

Re: VOTE: new commiter: Petr Jiricka

Ok, I fess up. I did it. I was reading some old postings to the list I had never read, came back later and thought I was reading current ones (forgot to check the date). Sorry for the confusion. So my commit +1's were only 6 months late! Glenn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi, > > Both Petr

Re: Tomcat 4.0 m4 filter impl.

(Thanks to Geoff for prodding me to respond to this :-) Danny Coward (specification lead for Servlet 2.3) is going to comment separately on the spec related aspects of the questions below. I'll stick mostly with the Tomcat 4.0 implementation stuff, and express a few options -- but they aren't au

RE: jsp - html speedup

Thank you for replying. I am trying to fully configure me linux so I can install the apache. I thing that I will give up and just start coding. The state machine is not dificult but not obvius. I will start with a limited version and then expand it. Bye, Gaston - Original Message - Fro

Re: An open letter to 3 developers

Ted Husted wrote: > It seems to me that the core issue is that > > * TC3.x will need more committers if it is going to remain viable once > TC4 is released. > > If you believe in Costin and TC3.x, then the thing to do is jump-in and > earn your committer's badge, so you will have a binding vote.

Re: Tomcat 3.2.1 JSP Source Disclosure

Robert This bug is already reported as BugRat Report #513 by Mr. Karezaki, too. From: Robert Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Tomcat 3.2.1 JSP Source Disclosure Date: Tue, 19 Dec 2000 13:15:18 +0100 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > This only seems to happen if you leave out the http version n

Re: Apache 2.0

> > > > I've got the _a9 sources, and I was able to compile - but apache crashed. > > There are known issues with _a9. I would suggest ignoring it completely. Ok, good to know. I'll stay with the CVS then. > > Now I'm trying to get apache2.0 using anonymous CVS, and I get: > > > > ap_bucket

Re: future questions

Hi again, Jon. > I downloaded the latest J2EE and it includes Tomcat. However, when I looked > on your website, it says that you have two versions of Tomcat. Which one > comes with J2EE? Which one should I be using? I'm sure J2EE will have a README telling you what version it includes. As for "

Re: future questions

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > 1+ > > The problem, of course, is that the critical functionality is evolving so > rapidly, that most "users" prefer the developer list, since that is where > the action is. This is the downside of a Open Source project such as Tomcat > (as opposed to the Apache Server

Re: Apache 2.0

H.. > I have all the good intentions in doing this, but I'm unable to get > Apache2.0 to work... > > I've got the _a9 sources, and I was able to compile - but apache crashed. There are known issues with _a9. I would suggest ignoring it completely. > Now I'm trying to get apache2.0 us

RE: future questions

> From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > on 12/19/2000 4:26 PM, "David Rees" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > How about forwarding them or pointing them to the tomcat-user list where > > these questions will be answered? > > Because not everyone wants to subscribe to a mailing list to ju

RE: future questions

1+ The problem, of course, is that the critical functionality is evolving so rapidly, that most "users" prefer the developer list, since that is where the action is. This is the downside of a Open Source project such as Tomcat (as opposed to the Apache Server project where CVS updates involve v

Re: future questions

on 12/19/2000 4:26 PM, "David Rees" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > How about forwarding them or pointing them to the tomcat-user list where > these questions will be answered? > > -Dave Because not everyone wants to subscribe to a mailing list to just get a simple question answered. -jon

RE: future questions

> From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > p.s. Costin, I had a great idea. I'm going to forward to you all of the > personal email based Tomcat support questions that I get. Have > fun answering > them. :-) How about forwarding them or pointing them to the tomcat-user list where these q

future questions

Lets see how many of these questions come up in the future by users: I downloaded the latest J2EE and it includes Tomcat. However, when I looked on your website, it says that you have two versions of Tomcat. Which one comes with J2EE? Which one should I be using? I found a bug in 3.3. When is t

Re: *beaten and battered*: JAASRealm works!

> Okay, after a full day's work, I have a working JAASRealm that lets you > use a JAAS LoginModule (or many LoginModules) for authenticating Web > clients. My company's KerberosLoginModule now happily authenticates a user > against our Kerberos 5 KDC from inside Catalina. Jazzy. Great ! > This

Re: Apache 2.0

Hi Ryan, I have all the good intentions in doing this, but I'm unable to get Apache2.0 to work... I've got the _a9 sources, and I was able to compile - but apache crashed. Now I'm trying to get apache2.0 using anonymous CVS, and I get: ap_buckets_file.c && touch ap_buckets_file.lo ap_buckets_f

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler IncludeGenerator.java

pierred 00/12/19 15:44:41 Modified:src/share/org/apache/jasper/compiler Tag: tomcat_32 IncludeGenerator.java Log: Bug fix for bug report #540. "If you have more than one set of tags with the same name, you get a compile error like this: Variable '_tmp

BugRat Report #540 was closed (apparently by: Pierre Delisle)

Report #540 was closed by Person #0 Synopsis: 2 or more sets of tags with the same names cause compile error (logged in as: Pierre Delisle)

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/native/mod_jk/apache2.0 mod_jk.c

costin 00/12/19 15:18:31 Modified:src/native/mod_jk/apache2.0 mod_jk.c Log: More function name updates. Revision ChangesPath 1.4 +21 -21jakarta-tomcat/src/native/mod_jk/apache2.0/mod_jk.c Index: mod_jk.c =

Tomcat 3.3

Hi, I would like to thank again Jon for his good intentions, and apologize if I offended him or anyone else - it's very easy to do so in email. Jon: I believe you had the best intentions, but you have to admit you may be worse than I am at diplomacy :-) ( and I'm very bad at that ) Going back t

Re: My Commiter Status

on 12/19/2000 2:28 PM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That would be me. I dont' get to set up accounts (that's farmed out to > someone else), but I do all the rest of the administrivia. > > I will check on where the account setup process is. Already done. I forwarded his em

Re: My Commiter Status

Dan Milstein wrote: > I'm wondering who I should bug about getting my committer login on locus. If I >understand the process correctly, I was voted in a few weeks ago, but I haven't heard >anything since. > That would be me. I dont' get to set up accounts (that's farmed out to someone else),

BugRat Report #576 was closed (apparently by: Pierre Delisle)

Report #576 was closed by Person #0 Synopsis: Can't have a tag inside a custom tag. (logged in as: Pierre Delisle)

*beaten and battered*: JAASRealm works!

Okay, after a full day's work, I have a working JAASRealm that lets you use a JAAS LoginModule (or many LoginModules) for authenticating Web clients. My company's KerberosLoginModule now happily authenticates a user against our Kerberos 5 KDC from inside Catalina. Jazzy. This is JDK 1.3-only cod

Re: OpenEJB

Alternatively you may wish to check out Enhydra Enterprise at http://www.enhydra.org/ which integrates Tomcat with the Jonas EJB container. Shawn Jon Stevens wrote: > on 12/18/2000 1:18 PM, "dferugson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Anybody know if tomcat is headed in the direction of being a

BugRat Report #626 has been filed.

Bug report #626 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #626 Details. Project: Tomcat Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: high Severity: serious Co

Re: Jasper Compiler -- when things go really wrong

This seems right. I'll put the fix in tomorrow unless someone objects. [no need to send a patch]. -- Pierre "Bucknam, Brian" wrote: > > It's a long story, but I'm working on a project where Jasper 3.x is embedded > inside a servlet, which can then be deployed to the container of our > custo

Fuck It.

To: Costin and the rest of you who commented. You obviously know what is best and have shown me that I simply have my head up my ass and I'm just a complete jerk and I should stop now and just let you do whatever you want. I give up. All of my previous -1 votes are now +1. Have fun. -jon

Re: An open letter to 3 developers

on 12/19/2000 1:31 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And given that you didn't like what he said, you felt an urge to verify if > he complies with the apache license ? No, that is how you decided to interpret it. But whatever. > It's not that often that I see apache people go

Re: An open letter to 3 developers

> > > I understand the need to credit Apache, but the license says nothing about > > having to credit them on your website. > > Sigh, I knew that after I sent that someone would pick that up and go to > town with it without understanding what I meant to really say. > > What I meant to say is th

cvs commit: jakarta-tomcat/src/native/mod_jk/apache2.0 Makefile.linux build-unix.sh mod_jk.c

costin 00/12/19 13:19:22 Modified:src/native/mod_jk/apache2.0 Makefile.linux build-unix.sh mod_jk.c Log: First round of changes to support the latest Apache2.0 It should compile ( with warnings - there are still functions that haven't been changed ).

Re: An open letter to 3 developers

on 12/19/2000 12:58 PM, "Timm, Sean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I understand the need to credit Apache, but the license says nothing about > having to credit them on your website. Sigh, I knew that after I sent that someone would pick that up and go to town with it without understanding what I

Re: ajp13 evolution or ajp14

> Hi, > > Way back to technic ;-) Great too see that. > When linking apache to tomcats in an untrusted networks, ajp12/ajp13 > streams are in clear. > > What about crypt stream between apache and tomcat ? Something like > DES with a known key between the two or something like a ticket ? > >

RE: An open letter to 3 developers

> From: Arun Katkere [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Jon: > Where does it say ASF has to be acknowledged on the Web site > describing the product? If the product contains ASF software and > it doesn't > acknowledge it in the documentation included with the software, then it is > another matte

RE: An open letter to 3 developers

Jon: Where does it say ASF has to be acknowledged on the Web site describing the product? If the product contains ASF software and it doesn't acknowledge it in the documentation included with the software, then it is another matter. I am not advocating this practice, but since you bring u

RE: An open letter to 3 developers

Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: > I'm sorry, but I missed the part on your website where you > Credit the ASF > for the use of the software according to the license on the > software that > you are using. Would you like to please point that out to me? > > I looked here: >

Re: FW: More Clarification

> Ok, I just got off the phone with Pier (who just broke both of his thumbs > skiing this weekend ouch) and he has clarified a bit of what Costin > expressed to him about what he really wants to do, so let me repeat it to > see if I got it right now: Thanks, Pier :-) > Costin wants to

Re: An open letter to 3 developers

This was an oversight on our marketing peoples part that produced this page on our web site. I will ensure that this is changed as fast as possible giving prominent credit as required. - Original Message - From: Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: <[EMAIL PROT

BugRat Report #624 has been filed.

Bug report #624 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #624 Details. Project: Tomcat Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: high Severity: critical C

Re: An open letter to 3 developers

on 12/19/2000 11:09 AM, "Bergquist, Brett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm using TC3.x as the backend for an network management system that we > ship/sell/give away with our equipment. I appreciate that you are using Tomcat, but... I'm sorry, but I missed the part on your website where you Cre

BugRat Report #623 has been filed.

Bug report #623 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #623 Details. Project: Tomcat Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: high Severity: critical C

Re: An open letter to 3 developers

I'm using TC3.x as the backend for an network management system that we ship/sell/give away with our equipment. I too, will be looking to TC4.x in the future, but at this time, I have a vested interest in TC3.x and would like to see it improved as far a stability and robustness and performance, a

FW: More Clarification

Seems that for some reason people (Larry, Nacho, others?) have missed this email. -jon -- From: Jon Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 17:39:35 -0800 To: tomcat-dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: More Clarification Ok, I just got off the phone w

Jasper Compiler -- when things go really wrong

It's a long story, but I'm working on a project where Jasper 3.x is embedded inside a servlet, which can then be deployed to the container of our customer's choice. The servlet uses JSP files as templates, which is where Jasper comes in. In this type of environment, sometimes thing can go really

RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

> Why not Tomcat 3.2.x+1? This is the problem finally? a question of version numbers? Whooa this is entertainment, this is fun (from and old Cabaret Voltaire Song) Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega

RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

Hi Craig, Reading you comment below, I do agree with you that it seems there are not enough committers. I would like to offer myself as a committer (for 3.x). I have sent 2 patches till now. Theses patches deals with redundancy/load-balancing and keeping sessions after tomcat restart. Right now

My Commiter Status

I'm wondering who I should bug about getting my committer login on locus. If I understand the process correctly, I was voted in a few weeks ago, but I haven't heard anything since. Thanks, -Dan -- Dan Milstein // [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

-Original Message- From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 2:01 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x > I'm not suggesting that we not release it. Thanks, I misunderstood. If it were released as 3.2.x+1, I would not be unhapp

Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

on 12/19/2000 10:48 AM, "Larry Isaacs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If Tomcat 3.3 can prove it is as stable as Tomcat 3.2.x and is > more spec compliant than 3.2.x, Why does it have to be called Tomcat 3.3? Why not Tomcat 3.2.x+1? > I think it would be a disservice to not release it as the fin

RE: Class reloading problems (TC 3.x)

Sorry, for Tomcat 3.x you're stuck restarting Tomcat after updating beans or servlets. Take a look at this post from Craig which may shed more light on the subject: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-user&m=97562988801936&w=2 I don't know if this is something Costin has any ideas about for

RE: VOTE: new commiter: Petr Jiricka

Hi, Both Petr and Vasile are commiters - since december, last year :-) Petr did a lot of pathces to JSP, Vasile ported mod_jk to AOLServer. It seems some mailers have a late Y2K problem on sorting the mail, and we are now responding to 1999 posts. To be honest, it would be very interesting to

Re: [VOTE] Committer Status for Marc Saegesser (was: Re: 3.x submitters[was RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x])

+1 Costin On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Craig R. McClanahan wrote: > Marc Saegesser wrote: > > > Craig, > > > > I'm willing to volunteer my time and effort to help out with maintenance of > > 3.x. We are embedding Tomcat 3.2.x into our product so I have a vested > > interest in making sure that the 3.

RE: [VOTE] Committer Status for Marc Saegesser (was: Re: 3.x submitters [was RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x])

+1 -Original Message- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 12:37 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VOTE] Committer Status for Marc Saegesser (was: Re: 3.x submitters [was RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x]) Marc Saegesser wrote: > Craig, > >

RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

Hi, My 2 cents. Our need at SAS Institute is for a Servlet 2.2/JSP1.1 that is as stable and as spec compliant as possible. That need isn't likely to change for at least 6 to 8 months. By the time many of our customers start using Servlet 2.3/JSP 1.2, Tomcat 4.0 may be in maintenance mode and m

Re: Committers

Quoting Pierre Delisle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > +1 for Vasile Gaburici > +1 for Petr Jiricka > +1 for Marc Saegesser Same. Remy

RE: VOTE: new commiter: Petr Jiricka

+1 for Petr Jiricka

RE: VOTE: new commiter

+1 for Vasile Gaburici

Re: [VOTE] Committer Status for Marc Saegesser (was: Re: 3.xsubmitters [was RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x])

on 12/19/2000 9:37 AM, "Craig R. McClanahan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As Marc points out, he has submitted patches, and has good ideas for what > needs > to be taken care of on 3.2.x. I hereby propose him as a Tomcat committer. > > Votes? +1 -jon -- Honk if you love peace and quiet.

Re: [VOTE] Committer Status for Marc Saegesser (was: Re: 3.x submitters [was RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x])

"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > > Marc Saegesser wrote: > > > Craig, > > > > I'm willing to volunteer my time and effort to help out with maintenance of > > 3.x. We are embedding Tomcat 3.2.x into our product so I have a vested > > interest in making sure that the 3.2.x product is stable and rob

RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, GOMEZ Henri wrote: > >Look at the bugs in BugRat. The ones coming in for 4.0 are getting > >linked, documented and closed faster than the ones coming in > >for 3.x. The > >bugs for 4.0 are fewer than the ones coming in for 3.x. Shit, I think > >we've even got some 3.0's in

Archive: 2 more things

Bill, Before you send me the folder, please answer a couple of questions or direct me to what I need to read to answer them. I assume that since you've mentioned a folder, I'll be getting a tarred directory. What (at a high level of description) will be the structure of the data? I want to be

Committers

+1 for Vasile Gaburici +1 for Petr Jiricka +1 for Marc Saegesser -- Pierre

RE: [VOTE] Committer Status for Marc Saegesser (was: Re: 3.x submitters [was RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x])

+1 Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega > -Mensaje original- > De: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Enviado el: martes 19 de diciembre de 2000 18:37 > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Asunto: [VOTE] Committer Status for Marc Saegesser (was: Re: 3.x > submitters [was RE: [MY_OPINION] Tom

RE: VOTE: new commiter: Petr Jiricka

+1 Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega > -Mensaje original- > De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En > nombre de Glenn Nielsen > Enviado el: martes 19 de diciembre de 2000 5:09 > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Asunto: Re: VOTE: new commiter: Petr Jiricka > > > +1 > > Costin Manolache

RE: VOTE: new commiter Vasile Gaburici

+1 Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega > -Mensaje original- > De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En > nombre de Glenn Nielsen > Enviado el: martes 19 de diciembre de 2000 5:09 > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Asunto: Re: VOTE: new commiter > > > +1 Thanks for you contributions > > [E

[VOTE] Committer Status for Marc Saegesser (was: Re: 3.x submitters [was RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x])

Marc Saegesser wrote: > Craig, > > I'm willing to volunteer my time and effort to help out with maintenance of > 3.x. We are embedding Tomcat 3.2.x into our product so I have a vested > interest in making sure that the 3.2.x product is stable and robust. > As Marc points out, he has submitted p

Re: An open letter to 3 developers

It seems to me that the core issue is that * TC3.x will need more committers if it is going to remain viable once TC4 is released. If you believe in Costin and TC3.x, then the thing to do is jump-in and earn your committer's badge, so you will have a binding vote. If you are willing to join Co

ajp13 evolution or ajp14

Hi, Way back to technic ;-) When linking apache to tomcats in an untrusted networks, ajp12/ajp13 streams are in clear. What about crypt stream between apache and tomcat ? Something like DES with a known key between the two or something like a ticket ? Actually in my site I could look at everyt

3.x submitters [was RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x]

Craig, I'm willing to volunteer my time and effort to help out with maintenance of 3.x. We are embedding Tomcat 3.2.x into our product so I have a vested interest in making sure that the 3.2.x product is stable and robust. I've submitted a few patches in the last month or so (and gotten a coupl

Re: VOTE: new commiter: Petr Jiricka

+1 for Petr Jiricka Glenn Nielsen wrote: > +1 > > Costin Manolache wrote: > > > > Hi again. > > > > Please vote for adding Petr Jiricka ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ) > > to the list of official commiters. He fixed a big number of bugs > > in JSP and contributed many ideas in this area - including debugg

Re: VOTE: new commiter

+1 for Vasile Gaburici Glenn Nielsen wrote: > +1 Thanks for you contributions > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Please send your +1s for Vasile Gaburici. > > He did a great work integrating tomcat with AOLServer, had many > > contributions in the hardest part of tomcat ( the C cod

[BUG] Date header is missing in response (Tomcat standalone)

Their is no date header in the Tomcat generated response, this is critical in case Tomcat is not running behind Apache e.g. According to the HTTP specs (RFC 2616) the Date header MUST be included by the origin server. This will result in caching problems with some browsers (IE 5.0) and is a rea

[BUG] getProtocol() method on ServletRequest includes CRLF causingproblems

In Tomcat 3.2.0 the getProtocol() method on a ServletRequest includes CRLF (0x0d 0x0a) in the return value. Logic relying on string comparison like getProtocol().equals("HTTP/1.0") won't work anymore. The problem is in the HttpAdapter.parseHeaderFiled() method, that makes use of the BuffTool cla

Tomcat 3.2.1 JSP Source Disclosure

I did the following while testing a JSP on tomcat 3.2.1 and received the source for JSP instead of the proper output : telnet xxx 8080 Trying xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx... Connected to xxx. Escape character is '^]'. GET /test.jsp HTTP/1.0 200 OK Content-Type: text/plain Content-Length: 40 Last-Modified: Tue

Archive: 2 things

I believe I have now found the problem with truncated messages, which several have reported since the archive was updated. Thanks for letting me know I'll need to regen the entire archive to fix this, not a big problem, but it takes a bit of time, and my local telnet gateway seems to be out of

An open letter to 3 developers

Preamble: First off, let me take this opportunity to thank each and every one of you who has contributed to making Tomcat the great product that it is. I know that gets said sometimes, but not nearly enough. I have been a longtime lurker and occasional poster to this list. As a Java developer wh

BugRat Report #622 has been filed.

Bug report #622 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #622 Details. Project: Tomcat Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: high Severity: critical C

Class reloading problems

I saw a message on here a while back about problems with class reloading for accessory classes within a context, but never saw a resolution for the problem.  I am having this problem currently when trying to save an object to the servlet context for use by multiple servlets.  When the class

RE: [PROPOSAL] building is easy (was: Re: [tomcat-4.0] building i s hard)

For the large ones, like GCC, the recommended way is to build in an obj directory outside of the source directory. -Original Message- From: Jon Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, December 15, 2000 1:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] building is easy (was: R

BugRat Report #621 has been filed.

Bug report #621 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #621 Details. Project: Tomcat Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: high Severity: critical C

BugRat Report #620 has been filed.

Bug report #620 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #620 Details. Project: Tomcat Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: medium Severity: non-crit

RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > I remember the hard discution about spinaker on xerces > mailing-list and IBM became more open after Sun position. > But in the Tomcat case we have Sun on one side and > individuals on the others. > Not really the same condition. Hello Sam ?-) Tomcat 3.0 was clearly a Sun p

RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

GOMEZ Henri wrote: > > Hey Sam (Rubys) what's the IBM position on this project ? I've been trying to stay out of this particular discussion. Personally, I agree with James Cook that Jon is doing an excellent job of alienating people. Once upon a time, Craig was the lone heretic. The fact that

RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

>It is run under Apache rules and I haven`t seen anywhere that >the votes of >the 3.X committers count less than the 4.0 committers, so it`s still >democratic. The point is that when future of Tomcat was decided (some month agos), many of the actual commiters (including me) where outside tomcat (

BugRat Report #619 has been filed.

Bug report #619 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #619 Details. Project: Tomcat Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: high Severity: non-critic

Explaining a Yogi-ism

Hola Nacho, Sorry about the lack of clarity. I was remarking about the (perhaps humorous) coincidence that about the same time you and I thought about looking at the archives. Yogi Berra was a well-known baseball player who had/has an unusual, often humorous, but very perceptive way of putti

RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

>TC 4.0 appears to be more a Sun Project (core developpers are all Sun) >than an Apache Project. It is run under Apache rules and I haven`t seen anywhere that the votes of the 3.X committers count less than the 4.0 committers, so it`s still democratic. >TC 3.3 is now the only tomcat opensource

RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

>Look at the bugs in BugRat. The ones coming in for 4.0 are getting >linked, documented and closed faster than the ones coming in >for 3.x. The >bugs for 4.0 are fewer than the ones coming in for 3.x. Shit, I think >we've even got some 3.0's in there that haven't been dealt with! I'm sorry to s

BugRat Report #618 has been filed.

Bug report #618 has just been filed. You can view the report at the following URL: REPORT #618 Details. Project: Tomcat Category: Bug Report SubCategory: New Bug Report Class: swbug State: received Priority: medium Severity: serious

RE: Apache 2.0

Did you commit the changes to mod_jk ? I'll start soon to build a Apache 2.0 RPM and having an adapted mod_jk will be great... "Pour la plupart des hommes, se corriger consiste à changer de défauts." -- Voltaire >-Original Message- >From: Costin Manolache [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Se

  1   2   >