"Craig R. McClanahan" wrote: > > Marc Saegesser wrote: > > > Craig, > > > > I'm willing to volunteer my time and effort to help out with maintenance of > > 3.x. We are embedding Tomcat 3.2.x into our product so I have a vested > > interest in making sure that the 3.2.x product is stable and robust. > > > > As Marc points out, he has submitted patches, and has good ideas for what needs > to be taken care of on 3.2.x. I hereby propose him as a Tomcat committer. > > Votes? +1 Hans -- Hans Bergsten [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gefion Software http://www.gefionsoftware.com Author of JavaServer Pages (O'Reilly), http://TheJSPBook.com
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Greg Bailey
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Jon Stevens
- RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x David Rees
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Craig R. McClanahan
- RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x David Rees
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Craig R. McClanahan
- 3.x submitters [was RE: [MY_OPINION] ... Marc Saegesser
- [VOTE] Committer Status for Marc Saeg... Craig R. McClanahan
- Committers Pierre Delisle
- Re: Committers Remy Maucherat
- Re: [VOTE] Committer Status for Marc ... Hans Bergsten
- Re: [VOTE] Committer Status for Marc ... Jon Stevens
- Re: [VOTE] Committer Status for Marc ... cmanolache
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Jon Stevens
- RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x David Rees
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Jon Stevens
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x James Cook
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Jon Stevens
- RE: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x David Rees
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Nick Bauman
- Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x Craig R. McClanahan