Re: [MY_OPINION] Tomcat 3.x

[Jon Stevens]

on 12/19/2000 10:48 AM, "Larry Isaacs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> If Tomcat 3.3 can prove it is as stable as Tomcat 3.2.x and is
> more spec compliant than 3.2.x,

Why does it have to be called Tomcat 3.3?

Why not Tomcat 3.2.x+1?

> I think it would be a disservice to not release it as the final RI for Servlet
> 2.2/JSP 1.1.

I'm not suggesting that we not release it.

-jon