No, not the latest virus. You can share your favorite virus.
-Robert-
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: j...@jfeldredge.com
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 5:20 PM
To: OpenStreetMap tagging mailing list
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - deaddrop
Sounds like a good way to
RTC is the abbriviation of Regional Transportation Commission. So the amout
of money you have to pay for e.g. a bus ride.
-Robert-
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Nathan Edgars II
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 5:59 PM
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: [Tagging
amp;layer=c&cbll=52.235696,5.701937&panoid=amiIS_Sdj-ssgyQipVgJ3Q&cbp=12,274.9,,1,4.23
This is a real cycleway track I think
Please post your ultimate cycleway=track !!!
-Robert-
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Richard Mann
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 3:56 PM
To: Tag dis
Are there other new examples out there?
Mine was the first.
Please give me more examples of cycleway=track, especially in other
countries then the Netherlands.
-Robert-
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Nathan Edgars II
Sent: Friday, January 07, 2011 10:09 PM
To: Tag discussion
mean that
the track is on both sides.
Question for everybody:
Supposein Richards example the grass lane between highway and cyclewaytrack
is about 2 meters and they have planted a few trees on that grass lane.
Can we still call this a cycleway track?
-Robert-
-Oorspronkelijk bericht
ld be
highway:surface=asphalt.
Brainstorming in that structure cycleway:right=track can have also
cycleway:surface=paving_stone in case surface of the cyclewaytrack is
different from the main street.
This extention would be totally logical and really good readable.
-R
I’m geografically forced to. In a lot of
situations cycleway=track is either a less bad option.
cycleway=track should be re-initiated where possble and not avoided.
-Robert-
From: Pieren
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2011 4:51 PM
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re
oblem.
-Robert-
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Georg Feddern
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2011 5:00 PM
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways
Robert Elsenaar schrieb:
Peter wrote:
If you tag it as cycleway:both=track, it's more clear.
Please define seperation?
-Robert-
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Nathan Edgars II
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2011 7:54 PM
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Robert Elsenaar
wrote:
Drawing
ratly a strip of grass.
Now my disunderstanding, and please help me out:
When do you tag a cyclestrip as cycleway=track?
-Robert-
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Nathan Edgars II
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2011 8:11 PM
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: [SPAM
next to it?
-Robert-
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: j...@jfeldredge.com
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 5:08 AM
To: OpenStreetMap tagging mailing list
Subject: [SPAM]: Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways
So, no standalone cycleway will ever be mapped with the cycleway=track tag
I think. .. You hope !
-Robert-
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Peter Wendorff
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 12:33 PM
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [SPAM]: Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways
other opponents, but collegues. Please,
act like one.
-Robert-
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Nathan Edgars II
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2011 7:29 PM
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: [SPAM]: Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 7:12 AM
Dear Nathan,
With that kind of reaction it is hard for me to take you seriously in the
future.
I'd hoped you understand my cry to have you put yourselve in a positive mode
again.
I keep hoping.
-robert-
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Nathan Edgars II
Sent: Monday, January 10,
historic:period can also be interprtated by historical periods in fine arts.
-Robert-
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 4:40 PM
To: j...@jfeldredge.com ; Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: [Tagging] RFC
There is always a border where usefull meets unusefull.
When mapmakers do not support object information on their maps, every extra
information is useless.
I think the period of a historic place is within the usefull information tags
to a object.
-Robert-
From: Pieren
Sent: Wednesday, January
Certainly not like that. I will start a new thread to discuss this idea
more in detail.
I think there's nothing wrong when we try to standardize tags and have a
moment of retagging when we have a 1:1 substitution.
-Robert-
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: JohanJönsson
Sent: Thu
.
- Telling something about night and day time access rules.
These are just two examples.
By introducing Advanced Tagging more different element of the object is
possible.
Please who likes to reflect on this rough idea?
-Robert-___
Tagging mailing list
t have
to create extra sub tags.
Also like this:
* scuba_diving:services=repair;cources
I hope you can use it.
-Robert-
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: eMerzh
Sent: Friday, January 14, 2011 8:37 PM
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Scuba divin
scuba_diving:service=repair
scuba_diving:service=course
Note: All words singular
Consider: operator=PADI => league=PADI. The operator should be the
entrepreneur running this divespot or diveshop. The league is only the
organisation of whom the shop is selling courses.
-Rob
Great idea to reactivate is again. New times, new ideas.
I think capitals should be tagged to be Metropolis to also when they do not
have enough inhibitans to be granted as one.
-Robert-
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 5:11 PM
To
Jo,
This correct. Also the terrasser plugin makes relations like that.
Robert
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Dominik Mahrer (Teddy)
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 4:19 PM
To: winfi...@gmail.com ; Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] associatedStreet
Hi Jo
ikely
for primary, secondary, or tertiary roads. Maybe ukprow:ref=* would be
better?
(To complicate things slightly, at least one county I know of seems to
have recently renumbered their paths using a county-wide scheme, so
the Parish no longer plays a part, and each number is unique within
the c
//wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions ?
If ohv=* is understood as an access tag (though it doesn't appear at
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:access ), then you could e.g.
do something like ohv = no + ohv:conditional = yes @ (width > 50") t
dges are designed to provide useful items for those in
need, versus just help reduce waste versus. The balance is probably
slightly different for each implementation.)
Robert.
--
Robert Whittaker
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
ct:* scheme if at
> all.
Those would be my thoughts too.
Robert
--
Robert Whittaker
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
n see how using allotments=plot makes it clear it's
> a sub-division of landuse=allotments, so I'd accept the plural form in
> the tag. But that's getting into Bikeshedding again.
I'd probably favour allotments=plot for the reasons given.
Robert.
--
Robert Whitta
cation towers (e.g. there are some famous ones for tv).
I'd often use man_made=mast for tall single pole or lattice framework
structures.
Robert.
--
Robert Whittaker
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
to handle this (i.e. what
value of bicycle:pushed should be assumed if bicycle=no and there's no
bicycle:pushed=* tag present).
Robert.
--
Robert Whittaker
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
would have to think
carefully about how to handle the case of people who have previously
tagged bicycle=no to indicate case (d).
Robert.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
would not be bad to have it
> on all ways as explicit tag (IMHO).
That rather depends on whether bicycle=no is interpreted to mean "no
cycling" or "no bicycles" -- which seems to be the key thing we need
to agree on first.
Robert.
--
Robert Whittaker
__
e, but you need to check for
details" which they can use to warn end-users if the router doesn't
want to work out the precise details themselves.)
Robert.
--
Robert Whittaker
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
Not only is more information captured with this
scheme, if the legal implications of DE:use_cycleway change at any
point, there's a convenient key to use for any automated changing /
checking of the access tags that is desired.
Robert.
--
Robert Whittaker
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
cycle=use_cycleway style tag inappropriately due to
misunderstandings, and should end up with better-defined tags and more
accurate data.
--
Robert Whittaker
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
itly
stated that they don't claim any rights in the written Definitive
Statement, so if you can get permission from the council to use it in
OSM, then we can do so. See
http://robert.mathmos.net/osm/prow/council-docs.html for further
details.
> I think many t
t at higher zooms, a shading probably won't work very well
over other landuse colours, so a repeating glyph is probably the best
approach. "NR" probably isn't the best thing to use for an
international audience, but I'm sure someone could come up with a
pictographic symb
be recorded, and for
that I've used name=*. I know that perhaps doesn't quite fit with the
usual use of name=*, as here it's the name being shown, rather than
the name of the sign, but I thought it was close enough. But if anyone
has any better suggestions there..
opic, if two paths have identical surface and width
characteristics (which we can already tag), what difference does it
make whether it's through a park or across more open countryside? Why
would it matter to data consumers or renderers?
Robert.
--
Robert Whittaker
__
yal
Mail buildings to show that they weren't an amenity=post_office.)
I chose post_depot as a more general term, that would be applicable to
things that might be called a "Delivery Office", a "Sorting Office" or
maybe even something like "Parcel Hub" or "Distribut
legal status, physical condition and access rights. But I'm not sure
about village_green, as there's a physical/utility aspect captured
there that I think should be maintained, and I'm not sure that there's
an alternative tagging available at the moment.
Robert.
mon term here.
Searching online, suggests that this term is also used by several
major UK chain stores in connection with their departments that sell
this sort of stuff.
Robert.
--
Robert Whittaker
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
101 - 141 of 141 matches
Mail list logo
