Dear Nathan,
With that kind of reaction it is hard for me to take you seriously in the
future.
I'd hoped you understand my cry to have you put yourselve in a positive mode
again.
I keep hoping.
-robert-
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
From: Nathan Edgars II
Sent: Monday, January 10, 2011 10:16 PM
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: [SPAM]: Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Robert Elsenaar <rob...@elsenaar.info>
wrote:
Dear Nathan,
This replay seems to be a little off-topic, but I want to put it here
anyway.
Sinds I started this topic it became clear that several people understands
that there is a general problem with seperated cycleways not being part
anymore of the main road. They mainly try to find a solution for it by
pointing out their effort.
You are only breaking down their states by generating situations in which
the solution is not working. I suggest you start continuing your
participation by appoching their effort more possitively and coming up
with
your own solutions. We are not each other opponents, but collegues.
Please,
act like one.
What the hell...?
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Panda GP 2011 heeft dit bericht geclassificeerd als SPAM.
Als dit niet het geval is; klik dan op de volgende link om het te
herclassificeren:
http://localhost:6083/Panda?ID=pav_1789&SPAM=false&path=C:\Windows\system32\config\systemprofile\AppData\Local\Panda ecurity\Panda 8.63597E-277lobalProtection\AntiSpam
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
