Jo,
This correct. Also the terrasser plugin makes relations like that.
Robert
-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
From: Dominik Mahrer (Teddy)
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 4:19 PM
To: winfi...@gmail.com ; Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] associatedStreet
Hi Jo
I think this is correct and I use it identical. I do not use addr:street
at the buildings.
Teddy
On 18.03.2011 13:36, Jo wrote:
Hi,
I'm wondering if I used the associatedStreet relation correctly:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/1481807/history
I put all the common addr:-tags on the relation. Is that OK?
Do the buildings still need an addr:street tag?
I can't seem to find this information in the wiki.
Jo
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tekst ingevoegd door Panda GP 2011:
Als het hier gaat om een ongevraagde e-mail (SPAM), klik dan op de volgende
link om de e-mail te herclasseren:
http://localhost:6083/Panda?ID=pav_3579&SPAM=true&path=C:\Windows\system32\config\systemprofile\AppData\Local\Panda%20Security\Panda%20Global%20Protection%202011\AntiSpam
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
