On 24 July 2014 00:10, Dave F. <dave...@madasafish.com> wrote: > Thanks for pointing that out to me. As I said, I personally had no problem > with 'NR' but I'd be OK with it's removal is there was some king of infill. > ATM there is none & it looks virtually invisible.
I'm not sure if this is in the right place, but I've previously added some comments to the commit that implemented the changes: https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/commit/3e5cbea1413ef2fea0d43bffee51c39d940a4c6d In short -- I think we need an area-based rendering to make these visible. But at higher zooms, a shading probably won't work very well over other landuse colours, so a repeating glyph is probably the best approach. "NR" probably isn't the best thing to use for an international audience, but I'm sure someone could come up with a pictographic symbol instead. Robert. > On 23/07/2014 23:52, Matthijs Melissen wrote: >> >> On 23 July 2014 23:16, Dan S <danstowell+...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Not really an issue for the "tagging" mailing list - I don't think the >>> people who maintain the style are on here. If you're talking about the >>> main osm.org style then it's "openstreetmap-carto", maintained here: >>> https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/ >> >> More precisely for this issue: >> https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/200 >> https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/491 >> >> -- Matthijs -- Robert Whittaker _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
