2010/8/31 Nathan Edgars II :
> Adding a oneway tag explicitly says that it flows that way.
no, according to the oneway-definition in the wiki it says that
traffic is only allowed in this direction: it is a legal restriction
> It also makes it possible to see errors - how are
> you going to get e
2010/8/31 Nathan Edgars II :
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:11 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>> 2010/8/31 Nathan Edgars II :
>>> Adding a oneway tag explicitly says that it flows that way.
>> no, according to the oneway-definition in the wiki it says that
>>
2010/9/1 Peter Wendorff :
> Living streets are - at least in Germany, so I'm not sure if this question
> is specific for Germany or not -
IMHO it is. You should ask this on the german ML.
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.or
2010/9/1 Anthony :
> Couldn't incline=up/incline=down work for waterways too?
>
> Then incline=down could be default, and incline=unknown could be added
> where the incline is unknown.
This is not always true, think about culverts:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:D%C3%BCker.jpg
http://www.ikt.
2010/9/1 Anthony :
> honestly, I can't figure out what that is or how it applies.
I don't know how you call this in English (but probably it is called
culvert), this is a closed tube for water which goes down on one side
of the obstacle (e.g. road), the horizontally under it and up on the
other s
2010/9/1 Elena of Valhalla :
> On 9/1/10, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>> No, I know what you're grouping. It's the why that I'm unsure about.
>> Where's the benefit in this relation?
>
> it would be useful to manage common data (e.g. the name) in the
> relation instead of having to update it in every
2010/9/1 David Paleino :
> On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 05:26:26 -0400, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>> But why does this "logical unit" need to be grouped in a relation? I
>> don't see any benefit to it.
>
> The benefit is intrinsic in data organization.
+1, e.g. it allows you to download and select the comple
2010/9/1 Anthony :
>> http://dict.leo.org/?lp=ende&search=d%C3%BCker
>>
>> OK, got it (but the article is not mainly fitting):
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_siphon
>
> Ah, I see. But that wouldn't be tagged as a waterway, would it?
Why shouldn't it? Probably depends on the situation,
2010/9/1 Anthony :
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 3:03 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>>> Ah, I see. But that wouldn't be tagged as a waterway, would it?
>>
>> Why shouldn't it?
>
> Because it's not navigable, therefore it's not a waterway. A
2010/9/1 Anthony :
> examples of waterways on that wiki page are open. A culvert is more
> like man_made=pipeline, type=drain.
yes, but if it is part of a waterway, it would for consistencies sake
IMHO be better to keep it there. Above there was an example given
about a river that goes through a
2010/9/2 Steve Bennett :
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 1:46 AM, Phil! Gold wrote:
>> There is a proposal for a tracks= tag:
>>
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Multiple_Tracks
>
> Ok, two points:
> 1) That's a mechanism for only having a single way, and coding
> information abou
2010/9/3 Alan Mintz :
> old_name is documented for other objects. old_operator makes sense instead
> of operator, too.
I don't like old_name or old_operator very much, because what do you
do with 2, 3 or more old names/operators?
For old names it could be name:[1835-1918]=blabla but for operator
2010/9/3 Pieren :
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 9:19 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>
>>
>> I don't like old_name or old_operator very much, because what do you
>> do with 2, 3 or more old names/operators?
>>
>> For old names it could be name:[1835-1918]=
2010/9/3 Anthony :
> On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>> Split a way and save the change without updating the relation that
>> contains the way. Voila, broken relation. This happens more often than
>> one might think; for example downloading relation members in JOSM
>> does
2010/9/3 Nathan Edgars II :
> Not if you right click on a relation and download its members.
this might indeed be a bug.
> Not if
> you manually download a way without checking "download referrers" Not
> if you download a XAPI query of only ways.
this is user failure. If you download an object
2010/9/3 Christian H. Bruhn :
> Hi!
>
> If we look at the OSM-map (you can take each), there will be missing
> the name of most of all geographic objects. You will not find the
> Atlantic Ocean, the Alpes or anything else.
I second this. I liked the idea expressed by Martin Simon on Talk-DE,
who
2010/9/4 Sam Vekemans :
> the building tag is used when no other key would be appropriate for it.
no, the building-tag is to describe the building. You can have
building=cathedral, building=barn, building=detached_house,
building=highrise, but building=fast_food or police_station is not
appropria
2010/9/4 Sam Vekemans :
> a key 'social' does work for homeless_shelter, are there any other
> values (that are in other keys) that would fit with this social key?
> bingo_hall
I don't know these well, but I thought they would more belong to "leisure"?
> ... community_center (with a taggin
2010/9/4 Peter Wendorff :
> And AFAIK it's not a good idea to translate every value like you do it here.
> The translations/languages should only apply to names, not on "classes".
> If your Application wants to use different languages than English, it should
> use a dictionary for that at client si
2010/9/5 Willi :
>> So that would be something like:
>> landuse=residential
>> residential.en=[ apartmentbuildings | villas | small houses | vacation
>> houses | farmbuildings]
>> residential.sv=[ flerbostadshus | villområde | småhus | fritidshus |
>> radhus | miljonprogram] etc.
this is one poss
Many people are tagging single trees, and usually use natural=tree for
this. Now there are some voices on the German ML that say,
natural=tree is reserved for "special" trees, and can therefore not be
used for "ordinary" trees.
I changed the wiki according to what I perceive actual usage, by
chang
2010/9/6 Serge Wroclawski :
>> In practice, it seems unlikely that any one will try to tag every tree in a
>> forest
> It's entirely possible to map every tree in a city.
I agree to both of you. For subtagging I think that there is already
some documentation in the wiki (not all are already on th
2010/9/6 NopMap :
> The definition has been unchanged since 2006. The tag has been used 372,969
> times (tagstat).
Are you seriously pretending that all those are mapped according to
your interpretation of the wiki? My guess is that the ones you would
think that fit into this definition are less
2010/9/6 NopMap :
>> Are you seriously pretending that all those are mapped according to
>> your interpretation of the wiki? My guess is that the ones you would
>> think that fit into this definition are less then 1%.
> No. I say that we don't know how many of them have been used that way - but
> I
2010/9/6 NopMap :
> - fix the new generic trees in the cities to use denotation=urban
> - keep the default meaning for trees without denotation as landmarks,
> compatible with existing definition
as you seem to insist I propose to go voting for this. I just don't
see the point in adding additiona
2010/9/6 Dmitry Granovsky :
> Hello,
>
> Here is the proposal originating from Russia:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Surface:all_weather.
>
> Basically, it involves splitting surface=unpaved into two more
> specific categories (more details on the proposal page). Your comme
2010/9/6 André Riedel :
> Fission power plants could use 'clean' uranium 238 or (with a special
> license) a plutonium uranium mixture (MOX) or Thorium MOX.
does this on the other hand suggest I don't need a special license to
run my fission reactor in the attic with ordinary Uranium 238?
:D
che
2010/9/6 André Riedel :
> BTW it is easy to find stones with a low density of uranium 238 so you
> only need a uranium enrichement machine in your backyard to start this
> trial :o)
Yes, I know, but let's discuss this further in private ;-)
cheers,
Martin
_
I'm following a plead by Federico Cozzi and announce that there is
voting going on for the tag amenity=ice_cream.
Personally I already opposed this tag in the currently proposed form.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Ice_cream#Voting
cheers,
Martin
___
2010/9/6 NopMap :
> I have done a statistical analysis of the distribution of tree nodes in
> Germany. The result indicates that 4585 trees are actually single trees.
> (They don't have another tree within 50m). That makes about 15.8 %. Assuming
> the same rate globally, you'd throw away the inform
2010/9/7 NopMap :
> I dont't think so. Considering that 75% of the trees are from only 3 users,
> they could be quickly fixed.
IMHO tagging ordinary trees as "non-significant _or_ not lone" (which
is the wiki definition) is an absurdity. If we cannot agree on tagging
special trees in a special wa
2010/9/7 Nathan Edgars II :
> So obviously this is a tower:
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Electric_transmission_lines.jpg
+1
> and this is a pole (no matter what voltage it carries):
> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Pyl%C3%B4ne_haute_tension.JPG
-1, poles are solid, the one y
2010/9/7 Anthony :
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 11:27 AM, NopMap wrote:
>>
>>
>> Anthony-6 wrote:
>>>
>>> Where does the 58,000 number come from again?
>>>
>>
>> If you scale up the result of the German analysis to the global numbers,
>> you'd get about 59000 individial trees that are intended as land
I already voted yes, but actually agricultural_engines doesn't
correspond to Landmaschinen, it might be agricultural_machinery, see
here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agricultural_machinery
(but this article actually looks like it was created by a German,
maybe someone else can help us).
The point
craft=fashion should be fashion_designer to correpond to the
translation, but still this is not a craft. I would put it in office.
jeweler is AE ,use jeweller (BE)
craft=photo is too generic, there is not explanation given (just
questionmarks), and it isn't a craft IMHO.
instead of staging I'd u
2010/9/7 Nathan Edgars II :
>>> Or this, where a single pole is made of metal with diagonals:
>>> http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Stork_nest_on_power_mast.jpg
>>
>> nice pictures, but I can't see any pole in it.
>
> The thing in the middle is a pole. Again, it's only not a "pure" pole
> bec
2010/9/7 Alan Mintz :
...
elaborated tagging, I'd like to see this in the wiki.
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
2010/9/7 John Smith :
>
> craft=mechanic
> mechanic=[agriculture|marine|automotive]
+1, I also thought about this.
Cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
2010/9/7 Nathan Edgars II :
> As an example, I drove past two nearby poles today that carry two
> lines, one 69 kV (the step between intercity lines and lines on every
> street) and one below at a lower voltage. One was solid reinforced
> concrete; the other was (presumably) hollow metal. Otherwise
2010/9/7 Peter Körner :
> Am 07.09.2010 18:01, schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
>>
>> craft=fashion should be fashion_designer to correpond to the
>> translation, but still this is not a craft. I would put it in office.
>
> I don't think so, but I'd be happy to d
2010/9/7 Peter Körner :
> Am 07.09.2010 18:27, schrieb John Smith:
>>
>> I'd also consider things like hairdresser to be in shop, even though
>> it might be seen as a craft,
>
> I'd too regard craft=hairdresser as an uncommon combination. Any votes
> against removing craft=hairdresser from the list
2010/9/7 John Smith :
> How many lock smiths actually make something? The ones here sell and
> install alarm/security systems, cut keys etc... They don't make their
> own locks...
probably that would be better shop=alarm_systems? or burglar_alarm?
>
> I think you'll find most stuff is made els
2010/9/7 :
>
>>
>> no, this is definitely not a pole. Poles have to be solid cylinders,
>> but you might be right that they can be hollow, not sure about the
>> latter.
>>
>
> A power pole made of concrete (as used in new south wales, australia, is
> hollow.
> It's a material used and construction
2010/9/8 Sean Horgan :
> something similarly named). How can I get hold of the user kerosin?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/kerosin
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
2010/9/7 :
> This discussion is because 'craft' is not the best English word.
there is a WIkipedia-article that is translated in German into "Handwerk":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trade_%28occupation%29
but you can already see by the content and length of the article that
it is probably a st
2010/9/8 Alan Mintz :
> At 2010-09-04 09:12, Erik Johansson wrote:
> I've taken a slightly different approach. I use landuse=residential to
> outline the entire related area. I then add that way to a relation with
> role=boundary. I add the various buildings, roads leading to and within,
> swimmin
2010/9/8 Eric Jarvies :
> I've never seen a locksmith shoe repair store either :-)
there is a big franchise in Germany who offers exactly this:
http://www.misterminit.de/
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.o
2010/9/8 Alan Mintz :
> At 2010-09-07 20:28, John F. Eldredge wrote:
>>
>> Other arrangements are common as well, such as duplexes (buildings holding
>> two households); the same property owner owns both halves of the building,
>> and the land underneath both; he or she may live in one half and ren
2010/9/8 Erik Johansson :
> But wikipedia is very vague on this subject so I think it's pretty
> hard to be able to get good terminology.
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_building_types#Residential_Buildings
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Housing_tenure
have a look here:
http://en.wikipe
2010/9/8 Richard Mann :
> Please: someone write a bot to add landmark=probably to every tree in
> Germany,
-1, please just for the Nürnberg area.
and stop this debate. If it's a landmark, then it's worth
> adding a tag to say so.
+1
cheers,
Martin
___
2010/9/8 Alan Mintz :
> above. Seems like these should be drawn as residential buildings and then
> add POIs for the shops.
Of course that's a way to tag them (and it is already done widely in
Europe), but when talking about typology they could merit their own
type-tag.
cheers,
Martin
_
2010/9/8 John F. Eldredge :
> One point of clarification: "mobile home", in US usage, refers to a
> prefabricated structure that, while it can be towed by a large truck, is too
> large to be towed by an ordinary car or most (perhaps all) pickup trucks.
> Many of them are mobile only during the
2010/9/8 Nathan Edgars II :
> Another complication: all examples but one on
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:power%3Dpole are metal with
> trusses.
It's a pity. What do the English natives say, is mast a good word?
Actually I think that pole isn't because it is (language) implying a
form
2010/9/8 Nathan Edgars II :
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>> When I get a chance I'm going to compile a table of all the different
>> types I can find.
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:NE2/power
> Does anyone have a type that is not similar to any of these?
2010/9/8 Nathan Edgars II :
> Perhaps we can just specify that these should be tagged power=pole
> pole=narrow_base_lattice?
+1
I'd say that's a good compromise for those who want to be precise
(even though it is semantically wrong). It is similar to the tunnel=xy
solution, where xy is technicall
2010/9/9 NopMap :
> And what use could that possibly be in a restricted area like that?
> Or did you forget the smileys?
yes, sorry, that was not completely serious.
> From the topology analysis, I have marked every tree without further
> information that has another tree within 50m with "denota
2010/9/10 Tobias Knerr :
> For the record, I think that the denotation=cluster tag is a bad idea.
> It's vague, overlaps with the other values of denotation and doesn't add
> any information that wasn't there before.
as I already expressed here: I completely agree.
cheers,
Martin
_
2010/9/10 NopMap :
> John F. Eldredge wrote:
>> Perhaps i've miss something but i haven't see a discussion about a bot
> Yes, you missed something. Check the posts from Sept. 7th:
> Tagging ML:
> Anthony-6: "Can't that analysis be expanded to the worl
2010/9/11 David Groom :
> What's the preferred way of tagging a mast like this
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Rowridge_from_entrance_gate_200704270010.jpg
>
> From memory I had thought it was man_made=mast, but I cant find any mention
> of that on the wiki.
>
> I see on the wiki there is a"
2010/9/11 Nathan Edgars II :
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 5:27 AM, David Groom wrote:
>> What's the preferred way of tagging a mast like this
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Rowridge_from_entrance_gate_200704270010.jpg
>>
>> From memory I had thought it was man_made=mast, but I cant find any
2010/9/11 Nathan Edgars II :
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:39 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>> 2010/9/11 Nathan Edgars II :
>>> It's a guyed tower.
>>
>> a tower is "self-supporting", which might be read as contradictory to
>> guys (unles
2010/9/11 John Smith :
> On 12 September 2010 01:39, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>> I would like to be able to tag something like this:
>> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/de/b/b5/Stundturm_Schaessburg.JPG
>> or this with parametrical values that all
2010/9/11 David Groom :
> Personally I'd like to see a different top level tag to differentiate
> between more solid structural towers such as towers
> http://www.visitingdc.com/images/eiffel-tower-picture.jpg
> http://www.canadaphotoseries.com/files/canada/images/Toronto-CN-Tower.jpg
> http://medi
2010/9/13 Pieren :
> No, that's exactly the same as 'oneway=no' on two-ways roads. When the tag
> is not present, we assume that the road is two ways. That's it. If it's
> wrong, then fix it by adding the oneway tag.
> It is the same for waterways and the direction of the way. If it's wrong,
> the
yes, it should be both (or could be also building=tower instead of yes).
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
2010/9/15 Katie Filbert :
>> these are the obvious ones, although there are also
>> garages devoted to commercial vehicle fleets.
>>
>> anyone have any thoughts on this?
>
> I would tag them as amenity=parking + access=private + operator=New York
> State Department of Transortation (or whatever ap
2010/9/15 John Smith :
> On 15 September 2010 08:48, Richard Welty wrote:
>> so depot really sounds ok.
>
> So...
>
> highway=depot
> depot=bus|communication|road_works|
yes for the subtags, but why "highway"?
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging mailing l
2010/9/15 John F. Eldredge :
> A garage is highway-related, but it isn't a way. As far as I know, all of
> the other usages of the highway tag are a road, path, track, motorway, or
> some other type of way.
I agree (the only exception I am aware of is highway=bus_stop on nodes
(actually lookin
Recently I stumbled upon a tag sneaked into the wiki without (AFAIK)
any discussion or announcement on this list.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dgive_way
Actually we do have a proposal process and if the creator would have
used it, there probably wouldn't be such a bad descripti
2010/9/15 Pieren :
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 3:59 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>>
>> There are
>> no indications on how to use this (on a node part of the highway or
>> beside it). Why is this a highway-tag?
>>
>
> Consistent with the very similar
Am 15. September 2010 19:53 schrieb Matthias Meißer :
> Hi Martin,
>
> you spot exactly the point. There are a few tags in different tagging pages
> that have one of this: no discussion, not wellknown, unvoted
the problem is, that until they fit into our common logics they are
quite welcome to me
2010/9/15 Elizabeth Dodd :
> I would have put 'craft' under industrial, and then used 'trade' but
> craft is too far processed to consider a complete alternative.
this might be a cultural difference, but IMHO craft is the mere
opposite of industrial
cheers,
Martin
_
2010/9/15 Nathan Edgars II :
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 9:59 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>> Recently I stumbled upon a tag sneaked into the wiki without (AFAIK)
>> any discussion or announcement on this list.
>>
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highw
2010/9/15 John Smith :
> On 16 September 2010 06:52, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>> this might be a cultural difference, but IMHO craft is the mere
>> opposite of industrial
>
> It's somewhere between hobby and industrial...
It is not industrial, because it operate
2010/9/16 Dave F. :
> On 15/09/2010 21:53, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>>
>> of course stop is also bad. traffic signals is bad as well.
>
> Err... Why?
because it doesn't work well. It is a simplistic approximation to
indicate that a crossing is controlled by traffic l
another example for sneaking in tags is IMHO
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:fuel:electricity
with electricity not being "fuel" and actually IMHO not being helpful
to be used in conjunction with petrol stations (amenity=fuel). Why
don't we use charging station or something else for these? T
2010/9/16 Jonas Stein :
> You can rent a lot of things. Today (2010-08-16) there is a different
> approach for each thing you can rent.
>
> * car
> * bicycle
> * boat
>
> All have common keys like operator and so on. They only differ in the item
> you can rent.
>
> This proposal will be
2010/9/16 John Smith :
> You made this point exactly, you claim it should be charging station
> based on the assumption these locations only sell electricity, but do
> you know that for a fact?
yes, I know that for a fact as of now and for the locations I know of.
This might change in the future
2010/9/16 John Smith :
> On 17 September 2010 00:47, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>> because it doesn't work well. It is a simplistic approximation to
>> indicate that a crossing is controlled by traffic lights but when it
>
> You are also tagging a fact, at this
2010/9/16 John Smith :
> 2010/9/17 Matthias Meißer :
>> If we 'allow' it to one user, we have to allow it everybody. How should this
>> anarchy work fine? How should it guide newbies to point out what are the
>> important and approved tags (for now)?
>
> At present I can see 3 potential ways:
>
> 1
2010/9/16 John Smith :
> Regardless of descriptions, do you agree that there is disputes over
> the key/value pairs?
yes, and this would be the same with numbers, shifted to the
descriptions, and there would be the same disputes for the
descriptions, especially if they are changing dynamically.
>
2010/9/16 André Riedel :
> Selling cars and sometimes letting of cars:
> shop=car
> rental=yes
selling cars and renting motorbikes.
shop=car
rental=yes?
Better use the syntax of the proposal: selling cars and letting of cars:
shop=car
rental=car
> selling only few ski equipments and rental
Am 17. September 2010 09:21 schrieb Matthias Meißer :
> Ok but it's hard to crosscomunicate. The only possibility I see are projects
> like:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Community_Updates
> http://blog.openstreetmap.de (german week review)
these are nice to get a summary on what has happe
2010/9/17 Ulf Lamping :
>> I won't use shop or rental with yes/no because it is against the
>> convention.
>
> I don't know which convention you are talking about, as there is none today
> in that regard.
there is the convention for shop:
shop=
yes/no are no shop-categories. I assumed that renta
I also found recently information attached to a bridge (in a more
technical and less representative way), actually a really small
pedestrian bridge:
http://www.23hq.com/dieterdreist/photo/5953091
http://www.23hq.com/dieterdreist/photo/5953084
Sorry that they are hard to read due to reallife taggin
2010/9/17 André Riedel :
> I found this combination very often:
>
> amenity=fuel
> shop=yes
What does it mean? The wiki only has documentation for shop=kiosk in
conjunction with amenity=fuel
What category is "yes" in?
cheers,
Martin
___
Tagging maili
2010/9/17 John F. Eldredge :
> At a guess, the combination of amenity=fuel and shop=yes means that there is
> a retail shop in addition to fuel sales. This most likely is what Americans
> call a convenience store. Typically, most of the inventory will be beer,
> candy, soft drinks, and cigaret
2010/9/17 John Smith :
> On 17 September 2010 23:30, Daniel Herding wrote:
>> Dear mappers,
>>
>> I have started a proposal on how to map mazes (labyrinths):
>> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/maze
>>
>> I'd be happy to receive comments on the talk page:
>> http://wiki.openstr
2010/9/17 John Smith :
> On 18 September 2010 03:31, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>> No, absolutely no, a maze (actually a labyrinth) was the first piece
>
> Thanks for the history lesson, but that hardly applies to most modern
> mazes which tend to be made from hedges et
2010/9/17 John F. Eldredge :
> Well, amusement parks sometimes contain mazes, but I wouldn't classify mazes
> as a type of amusement park. They are also sometimes a feature of formal
> gardens; some hedge mazes have been in existence for centuries.
+1
That was my intention to express when I ci
2010/9/17 John Smith :
> There is an amusement park near here, it's main attraction is it's
> maze, there are some other side attractions, but these aren't the main
> focus for visitors.
I know of an amusement park, it's main attraction is it's castle.
http://disneyworld.disney.go.com/parks/magic
2010/9/18 John Smith :
> On 18 September 2010 10:27, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>> I know of an amusement park, it's main attraction is it's castle.
>
> You really need to work on your analogies, maybe you should have
> suggested it's main attraction is a
2010/9/18 John Smith :
> attraction", however you just jogged my memory, there is a castle
> attraction near to here:>
> http://www.sunshinecastle.com/>
> As for the maze place, it has maze in the name "Bellingham Maze">
> http://www.bellmaze.com/
you might have gotten me wrong: I am not really i
2010/9/19 Richard Fairhurst :
> barrier=gate states that there's a gate. The thing about gates, as opposed
> to (say) walls, is that you can open them to get through.
> Here are some pictures if I haven't explained it clearly enough:
> http://www.artlondon.com/photogallery/images/wellmann/Open-gate
Hi,
I'm asking for comments to the "new" barrier types listed here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/New_barrier_types
If you miss something, please report here so that we can extend the
proposal. I somehow forgot about it, but want to close the process now
in some weeks time
2010/9/20 Tobias Knerr :
> M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> * Couldn't we just use barrier=rope/chain on ways, too? Introducing
> barrier=post_and_rope/post_and_chain for this seems unnecessary.
yes, I agree, actually someone else put this value there
> * Isn't a guardrai
2010/9/20 John Smith :
> What about water filled plastic barriers?
>
> http://www.made-in-china.com/showroom/resourcesint/product-detailzqMJlfFDaQGv/China-Water-Filled-Plastic-Barrier.html
>
> They may not be permanent, but some stay in place for long periods of time.
Yes, which tag would you sug
2010/9/20 Dave F. :
> On 20/09/2010 19:27, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Spike/Teeth Barriers
>
> http://www.entryparkingposts.com/
> These don't allow travel unless retracted.
yes, this is nice, I have never seen them, which value do you suggest?
> There's also th
2010/9/21 John Smith :
> On 21 September 2010 09:57, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
> wrote:
>> Yes, which tag would you suggest? They are similar to guard rails IMHO
>
> Guard rails usually run parallel with the road, these barriers can be
> used to block the road to force traff
2010/9/20 John Smith :
> That might cover mazes, but how about the rest of the amusement/theme
> park options?
>
> I'm think someone suggested attraction=maze the other day... In which
> case attraction=castle|dodgem_cars|ferris_wheel|water_slide|wave_pool|
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/T
401 - 500 of 969 matches
Mail list logo
