2010/9/10 NopMap <ekkeh...@gmx.de>: > John F. Eldredge wrote: >> Perhaps i've miss something but i haven't see a discussion about a bot > Yes, you missed something. Check the posts from Sept. 7th: > Tagging ML: > Anthony-6: "Can't that analysis be expanded to the world, and the trees > retagged?" > M∡rtin Koppenhoefer: "can't you do this analysis and add tags to the > landmark trees?" > German ML: > Wolfgang-4: "Aber aus deinen Daten sollte es doch eigentlich möglich sein, > die einmal so erkannten und damit "geretteten" Bäume per bot mit einem > entsprechenden Tag zu versehen," > > I did what was asked for.
no, you did clearly the opposite, and didn't announce this before, which I think is not the right approach, given that this topic seems highly controversal. > You can't mark landmarks automatically, but can > add a hint to those that are likely unremarkable. > So please keep complaining, I am removing myself from the discussion. that's quite absurd and can IMHO not be tolerated: we couldn't come to a solution on the German ML, then this topic was put to tagging-ML, nobody agreed with you, voting was suggested, then you used a bot to make pointless edits, and now you say: "keep complaining, but I'm removing myself"? cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
