2010/9/6 NopMap <ekkeh...@gmx.de>: > The definition has been unchanged since 2006. The tag has been used 372,969 > times (tagstat).
Are you seriously pretending that all those are mapped according to your interpretation of the wiki? My guess is that the ones you would think that fit into this definition are less then 1%. Only recently, people have started adding every single tree > along a road, in a park or even every single tree in a forest. "Only recently they have started"? Probably only recently you have noticed. > Usually, trees are not rendered or not rendered prominently. I develop a > hiking map in which landmark trees are rendered more prominently with a > small tree icon. I suggest to use landmark=yes on those for your maps > Where people have tagged the urban > trees properly with the additional tag "denotation=urban", they can just be > filtered away. > > Therefore it would be helpful to use the denotation tag more widely for > non-significant trees. It is fairly simple to mass select all tree nodes in > a city park and add the proper tag. I'd put it on the opposite: use denotation for special trees. It doesn't really sound logical to put denotation=nothing special;unimportant and it doesn't solve the question how to deal an urban tree that is significant. cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
