I would do the same.
Met vriendelijke groeten
Robert Elsenaar
"Dave F." schreef:
Hi
I have a country lane where on one side has a dashed white line about
1.5m from the road edge & a walking person symbol painted on the
surface. It has no adjacent raised kerb footpath. Wha
Jo,
This correct. Also the terrasser plugin makes relations like that.
Robert
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Dominik Mahrer (Teddy)
Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 4:19 PM
To: winfi...@gmail.com ; Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] associatedStreet
Hi Jo
Great idea to reactivate is again. New times, new ideas.
I think capitals should be tagged to be Metropolis to also when they do not
have enough inhibitans to be granted as one.
-Robert-
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 5:11 PM
To: T
ert-
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: John Smith
Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 4:25 AM
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Scuba diving (Shop or spot)
On 18 January 2011 04:46, Robert Elsenaar wrote:
* scuba_diving:filling=air;nitro
I have corrected some typo's last week
I was pleased you used namespaces. That good.
I want to make a suggestion to configure this a little different.
* scuba_diving:filling=air;nitrox32;nitrox36;trimix;oxygen
In that way to are prepared to future developments and also you don't have
to cre
Since I updated the Dutch Feature Page I analyzed the tagging system and found
out a typically evolution in the way OSM is tagging map objects.
1) =: Simple tagging system. Every new Tag has to be created. Every
Tag and every value has to be documented. You vcan not be creative in making
new co
Certainly not like that. I will start a new thread to discuss this idea
more in detail.
I think there's nothing wrong when we try to standardize tags and have a
moment of retagging when we have a 1:1 substitution.
-Robert-
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: JohanJönsson
Sent: Thursday,
There is always a border where usefull meets unusefull.
When mapmakers do not support object information on their maps, every extra
information is useless.
I think the period of a historic place is within the usefull information tags
to a object.
-Robert-
From: Pieren
Sent: Wednesday, January
historic:period can also be interprtated by historical periods in fine arts.
-Robert-
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 4:40 PM
To: j...@jfeldredge.com ; Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: [Tagging] RFC: historic:civil
2011 10:16 PM
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: [SPAM]: Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Robert Elsenaar
wrote:
Dear Nathan,
This replay seems to be a little off-topic, but I want to put it here
anyway.
Sinds I started this top
Dear Nathan,
This replay seems to be a little off-topic, but I want to put it here
anyway.
Sinds I started this topic it became clear that several people understands
that there is a general problem with seperated cycleways not being part
anymore of the main road. They mainly try to find a solu
al\Panda%20Security\Panda%20Global%20Protection%202011\AntiSpam
---
Am 09.01.2011 11:37, schrieb Robert Elsenaar:
Ok, great. If that is the ultimate solution for all cycletracks.
Can you help me with the r
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Robert Elsenaar
wrote:
-Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: Nathan Edgars II
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2011 7:54 PM
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways
Huh? If there's separation between the cycleway
]: Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Robert Elsenaar
wrote:
-Oorspronkelijk bericht- From: Nathan Edgars II
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2011 7:54 PM
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways
Hu
Please define seperation?
-Robert-
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Nathan Edgars II
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2011 7:54 PM
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways
On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 1:47 PM, Robert Elsenaar
wrote:
Drawing
oblem.
-Robert-
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Georg Feddern
Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2011 5:00 PM
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways
Robert Elsenaar schrieb:
Peter wrote:
If you tag it as cycleway:both=track, it's more clear.
Drawing seperated ways is a workaround for a “Not yet solvable” problem. By
drawing a second way, what’s not there, is implicitely wrong. There is NO
SECOND WAY so try not to draw it then.
And yes I admit, I do use often the “second way solution” to solve complex
situations or situations were I
Peter wrote:
If you tag it as cycleway:both=track, it's more clear.
Yes you are right. But implicite we have accepted several default in our
tags.
E.g. we tag highway=residential and more precice would be
highway:type=residential
And we tag surface=asphalt and more precise would be
highway:su
ority for the
cycle tracks at side roads, which is a distinct novelty for the UK!)
Richard
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 8:57 PM, Robert Elsenaar
wrote:
Ladies and gentlemen,
All great thoughts. Peter i take your critisism on the right way.
Still you didn't answer my call for help.
Let go ba
, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Robert Elsenaar
wrote:
Ladies and gentlemen,
All great thoughts. Peter i take your critisism on the right way.
Still you didn't answer my call for help.
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:33 PM, N
Ladies and gentlemen,
All great thoughts. Peter i take your critisism on the right way.
Still you didn't answer my call for help.
Let go back to the base of my question:
cycleway=track
=
Who can give me examples on Google street view of what we have to
concider to be cycleway-tracks?
RTC is the abbriviation of Regional Transportation Commission. So the amout
of money you have to pay for e.g. a bus ride.
-Robert-
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Nathan Edgars II
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 5:59 PM
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: [Tagging]
No, not the latest virus. You can share your favorite virus.
-Robert-
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: j...@jfeldredge.com
Sent: Thursday, January 06, 2011 5:20 PM
To: OpenStreetMap tagging mailing list
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - deaddrop
Sounds like a good way to c
day, January 06, 2011 11:03 AM
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways
Am 06.01.2011 01:05, schrieb Steve Bennett:
On 6/01/2011 8:56 AM, Robert Elsenaar wrote:
Solution:
highway=secundary
name=Duinweg
surface=asphalt
maxspeed=50
cycleway=track
cycleway:su
Koppenhoefer
Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 8:02 PM
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Differences in cycleways
2011/1/5 Robert Elsenaar :
Looking on tags for cycleways I find 3 different types:
highway=cycleway: obvious these are free ways like here
cycleway=track
Looking on tags for cycleways I find 3 different types:
highway=cycleway: obvious these are free ways like here
(http://maps.google.nl/maps?hl=nl&ie=UTF8&ll=51.810446,5.173895&spn=0.00589,0.021136&z=16&layer=c&cbll=51.810477,5.173954&panoid=AELkS3h8zmUs821tPi1K-w&cbp=12,36.33,,0,6.46)
cycleway=la
After how many votes your proposal is approved?
-Robert-
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Kenny Moens
Sent: Monday, January 03, 2011 5:13 PM
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Plant Nursery
Hello,
Hereby I want to invite everyo
used
in the given cercomstances."
-Robert-
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Colin Smale
Sent: Sunday, January 02, 2011 7:52 PM
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Ultimate list of approved keys
On 02/01/2011 19:24, Ralf Kleineisel wrote:
On 01/02/2011 05:42
: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Ultimate list of approved keys
On Sat, Jan 1, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Robert Elsenaar
wrote:
Hi,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features lists a certain portion of
approved tags.
- Why only a part of all approved tags are
"hazard:bicycle" is the other way round. If there is a key/value e.g.
"hazard=narrow" then you can easily use "cycleway:hazard=narrow" to tag the
fact that the hazard tag is specificly warns for a narrow cycle-lane.
highway=*
cycleway:right=lane
cycleway:width=0.5
cycleway:hazard=narrow
I thin
Hi,
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features lists a certain portion of
approved tags.
- Why only a part of all approved tags are mentioned here?
- Where should I go to find the ultimate list of approved tags?
-Robert- ___
Tagging mailing list
tate rather than is_in:state? (response to
2010-12-26 05:29:46)
On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 7:57 AM, Robert Elsenaar
wrote:
Totally agree. More over, every time you use the symbol ":" in your tag,
you
mean that the subtag is telling something more specific about the maintag
thats in
Totally agree. More over, every time you use the symbol ":" in your tag, you
mean that the subtag is telling something more specific about the maintag
thats in front of it.
This methode should be introduced more widely all over OSM to avoid annoying
new and unnesseccerry tags or values.
Robert
http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de/
Robert
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Alan Mintz
Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2010 6:46 AM
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Operator in leisure=stadium?
At 2010-12-18 12:47, Diego Woitasen wrote:
I haven't found an o
Sounds well. No complains from my side.
Robert Elsenaar
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Diego Woitasen
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 4:11 PM
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [Tagging] Operator in leisure=stadium?
Hi,
What about using operator in leisure=stadium?. For example
untry. If there's not? There
is a nice job for you to do. And I can say that it's THE way to learn most
of the tags. ;)
Robert Elsenaar
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
From: Diego Woitasen try to
Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 3:14 PM
To: Tag discussion, strategy and related to
Hi,
We all know there lot of our maps are rendered with Mapnik.
Does somebody knows if there is development going on on this software. Dows
thsi software package evolve in supporting more complex situation in GeoData?
Robert___
Tagging mailing list
Ta
p.org/wiki/Mapnik.
Under the header "stylesheet" there are details about rendering features
described
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mapnik#Stylesheet
Willi
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Robert Elsenaar
wrote:
My name is ZMWandelaar (GB: SundayAfternoonHiker) and living in the
Nethe
Hi,
My name is ZMWandelaar (GB: SundayAfternoonHiker) and living in the
Netherlands. I’m starting May of this year. Quit active and wondering if there
is some documentation about tags rendered on particular maps? Starting on the
OSM Base Map what tags are displayed?
Thanks
ZMWandelaar ___
39 matches
Mail list logo
