[SAtalk] spamd and system wide whitelist

g list accounts. There is no standard /home catalog for the list addresses Blue Skies, /David ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Re: [SAtalk] spamd and system wide whitelist

> I did notice that spamd needed to be restarted before it would > notice changes to /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf. Thank you! It works perfect now:) Blue Skies, /David ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[SAtalk] Error Starting Spamassassin

Anybody have a quick cure for this? /etc/rc.d/init.d/spamassassin start Starting spamd: Cannot create tmp lockfile /root/.spamassassin/auto- whitelist.lock : No such file or directory [FAILED] --

[SAtalk] one more question

Is this right? spamd[11778]: identified spam (8.6/5.0) for root:99 in 1 seconds. May 13 08:17:51 spamd[10289]: connection from localhost.localdomain [ 127.0.0.1 ] at port 34374 May 13 08:17:51 spamd[11923]: Still running as root: user not specified, not found, or set to root. Fall back t

[SAtalk] OT: Spam hell

RCPT from host048021.arnet.net.ar[200.45.48.21]: 550 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: User unknown in virtual alias table; from=<> proto=ESMTP helo= Any idea how to stop this. The server is behind a firewall, so I guess it´s possible to block this bastard, but I don'

[SAtalk] Using spamc/spamd for aliases

local account for some of the aliases, can I use a .forward file to forward the mail after SA has scanned it. TIA, /David --- This sf.net emial is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM

[SAtalk] Spamassassin with qmai land dotqmails sending blank messages

I'm using Michael Devogelaere's qmail-sql qmail server for several domains. Prior to implementing spamassassin, dotqmails was working fine. Now that spamassassin is running via the qmail /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue shell script: #!/bin/sh spamc | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue.orig any message th

[SAtalk] Spamassassin with qmail and dotqmails sending blank messages

I'm using Michael Devogelaere's qmail-sql qmail server for several domains. Prior to implementing spamassassin, dotqmails was working fine. Now that spamassassin is running via the qmail /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue shell script: #!/bin/sh spamc | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-queue.orig any mess

RE: [SAtalk] rewriting subject lines.

By default spamassassin doesn't add to the subject line.  It just adds it's information to the mail headers.  You have to tell it to rewrite the subject line in your local.cf file -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of marc jacksonS

RE: [SAtalk] rewriting subject lines.

27;t it? Just for kicks, I toggled it b/n 0 & 1.  Neither worked. Any more thoughts? Regards, Marc >From: "David Groce" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: RE: [SAtalk] rewriting subject lines. >Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 11:59:56

[SAtalk] RBL Check and logfile question

Hi, We have just implemented SA in a site wide configuration. In debug mode, I am not seeing any RBL checks in the list of tests, but when I run spamc on the same message they show up just fine. The final scores also do not match. Here are parts of the log files. debug: running raw-body-tex

[SAtalk] Custom Subject rules not being picked up

I am having some trouble with Subject header rules to my local.cf file - they don't seem to be getting read by spamassassin. Example: header SUBJECT_VICODIN Subject =~ /\bvicodin\b/ describe SUBJECT_VICODIN Mentions vicodin score SUBJECT_VICODIN 4.0 (I took this example from Chris' site http:

[SAtalk] Header Test (RBL) Question

Hi, My header checks (RBL) only seem to be firing off when there is a forged HELO with the message, otherwise the checks come back as "success for 1 of 1queries". This is a new installation of ver 2.61. We are running a site wide config with no individual user prefs. Debug looks like: .

[SAtalk] 2.62: Multiple "bayes_toks.expire$$" files

_toks.expire$$" files a known problem? If not, how might we begin to help you to track it down? (Under MailScanner, SA is used as a subroutine library, not a daemon). -- : David LeeI.T. Service : : Systems Programmer Computer Cent

RE: [SAtalk] Custom Subject rules not being picked up

Thanks guys.. Made the change and also I run spamassassin with mimedefang and I reread the mimedefang file - now seems to work !! Cheers. -Original Message- From: Jennifer Wheeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 January 2004 14:32 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Custom Subj

Re: [SAtalk] Header Test (RBL) Question

Matt Kettler wrote: At 09:13 AM 1/20/04 -0500, David Roback wrote: debug: DNS MX records found: 0 Shouldn't I be seeing more than 1 query for all messages? Hmm.. looks like your DNS is flaking out.. I'm pretty sure you should always have at least one MX success from the DNS

[SAtalk] 99_FVGT_Tripwire creates large headers?

a problem for me as such, but I thought that it was worth mentioning. _ David Watson, Network Manager, Team17 Software Ltd. Phone: +44-1924-267776 Fax: +44-1

RE: [SAtalk] trouble sending mail to this list

What were you trying to send? This list is filtered for spam, so if you were trying to post a sample of a spam message it might be getting filtered. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Spyros Tsiolis Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 1:42 AM To: [

[SAtalk] DCC, pyzor, razor

Hi, We are currently using SA without DCC, pyzor or razor and have a detection rate of about 75-90% (but getting slightly better as we feed bayes). What improvement could we expect by implementing one (or all) of the above? What kind of processing delays are there for each? If we were to implem

Re: [SAtalk] Bayes Problems

more controlled, occasional and explicit expire. But it does suggest an underlying problem in SA's expiry code. I suspect that the process is being signalled, and probably dies, whereas it should probably try to tidy up the half-complete expire (e.g. some sort of fast abandonme

[SAtalk] Anti Bayes Spam?

its ability to find and identify spam? I have been holding off adding these types of spam e-mail that has got through the filters into my SPAM mailbox (which I use sa-learn) on in case this may be the case. Interesting see if anyone has any insight. -- Kind Regards, David A. Flanigan [EMAIL

[SAtalk] BAYES_99

spam? I realise this will have a lot to do with training etc, however I've found it to be generally a very strong spamsign, and I was wanting to know other peoples experiences. Regards, David Hooton Pain free sp

Re: [SAtalk] Re: A better alternative to test ROUND_THE_WORLD

bmitting them semi-automagically would be good, like the -r option for reporting spam to Razor? Once I know where to report 'em I'd be delighted to submit an appropriate patch. -- Grand Inquisitor Reverend David Cantrell | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david May your blessings always outw

Re: [SAtalk] ORBZ shutdown

norant.com's database. The fools also list .uk, so you're in good company. Note that .uk is listed for allegedy violating the *spirit* of some RFC, not the letter of it, so rfc-ignorant.com isn't even consistently applying its own rules. -- Grand Inquisitor Reverend David Cantrell |

[SAtalk] How to specify custom rules?

rules or something. :) David _ David Coppit - Ph.D. Candidate [EMAIL PROTECTED] The University of Virginia http://coppit.org/ Whenever anyone says, "theoretically", they really m

[SAtalk] Where do scores come from?

? Regards, David _ David Coppit - Ph.D. Candidate [EMAIL PROTECTED] The University of Virginia http://coppit.org/ Whenever anyone says, "theoretically", they rea

Re: [SAtalk] Where do scores come from?

On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote: > David Coppit wrote: > > Can someone tell me how the values get assigned to the various > > "detectors" in SpamAssassin? Has anyone explored automated > > techniques for assigning these scores based on genetic algorithms

Re: [SAtalk] How to specify custom rules?

DER, but that rule doesn't seem to fire either. (Although that might be a configuration issue on my end.) > There's already a test for the subject ending in a unique identifier; > it's SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID. Is this rule enabled in the default config? Or

Re: [SAtalk] best platform?

On Thursday 11 April 2002 14:29, CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson wrote: > > Qmail + qmailqueue patch + tls patch > > qmail-scanner + sophie/sophos > > spamd/spamc > > I ditto this. This system is very similar to mine and it just plain works! > Very little day to day maintenence. Mine too - I'm runn

[SAtalk] Non-spam tagged as spam

ng to have in a procmail spam check is to check that there's one and exactly one Message-Id. Two, zero, etc indicate probable spam. David. -- David Luyer Phone: +61 3 9674 7525 Network Development ManagerP A C I F I CFax: +61 3 9699 8693 Pacific Int

RE: [SAtalk] mbx format?

:0 * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes * !^Subject:.*Returned mail | dmail +in/spam David. -- David Luyer Phone: +61 3 9674 7525 Network Development ManagerP A C I F I CFax: +61 3 9699 8693 Pacific Internet (Australia) I N T E R N E T Mobile: +61 4 BY

RE: [SAtalk] spamc not working?

actly clear, I know... but at least that's how I believe it works, and it's never behaved in a way to convince me to double check) David. -- David Luyer Phone: +61 3 9674 7525 Network Development ManagerP A C I F I CFax: +61 3 9699 8693 Pac

RE: [SAtalk] reporting, filtering options

a custom rule can be defined in a user prefs turning this into a potential remote access hole[1]). David. [1] Try this rule and observe: full BLAH eval:File::Copy::copy("print","error") describe BLAH blah score BLAH -1 ..it doesn't work, but it calls code in

[SAtalk] Manually add individual addresses to whitelist?

Anyone know of an easy way to manually add an single (or multiple) addresse(s) to the whiltelist? Thanks! david ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

[SAtalk] File mail with really high scores?

Folks: Anyone know if it's possible to cause SA to treat spam with a really high spam score differently? I'd like to be able to configure a maximum spam score, which would cause SA to flag the message specially or just file it in a different mailbox. Than

[SAtalk] Report entire mbox file?

thing similar. Thanks! david ___ Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Spamassassin

Re: [SAtalk] Report entire mbox file?

Theo Van Dinter said: > On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 08:41:06AM -0500, David Gibbs wrote: >> Is there any way to submit the entire mailbox, full of collected spam, >> through the reporting feature (spamassassin -r)? >> razor-report has the -M parameter that allows this, it would

[SAtalk] BUG: messages which score exactly on the threshold not marked as spam

I just spotted something odd in my mailbox: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=5.0 required=5.0 This is with version 2.01, but I don't recall seeing anything on the lists about this, so perhaps it is still affecting the current version. -- Grand Inquisitor Reverend David Cantrell |

[SAtalk] user prefs file

Hello All, I'm new to spamassassin. I'm using spamassassin and sendmail installed from redhat 9. I also have Mailscanner installed. It looks like spamassassin doesn't look at the users user_prefs file. Is there a way to configure spamassassin to look at the user_prefs file?

Re: Re: [SAtalk] Bayes Spam Filtering

required parameters? > > On Wed, 2003-08-06 at 11:24, David Meier wrote: >> Hello, >> >> please excuse me to ask the same question again however, since I >> did not receive any reply on my last mail which was quite long I >> ask you any shorter: >> I am runni

Re: [SAtalk] Make trouble on RH9

s old (...why I deleted and deleted and > finally killed the .cpan directory entirely). I prefer to install > .60 rather than .55. > Thanks, > > Robert Shelton > > David Meier LOGNET AG Studbachstrasse 13c CH-8340 Hinwil Phone: +41-1-938-8032 Fax: +41-1-938-8039 -

Re: [SAtalk] osirusoft RBL's are TOAST......

/local/share/spamassassin) Should I add these other rules as well? -- David Olbersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Aquarium Site...: http://reefs.slickness.org --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek W

Re: [SAtalk] filter identifying vaild word as masked

r purposes this breaks down to: /\bpIz/i Which matches pizza or pizzaz, piz.* if that helps any. Make sense? -- David Olbersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Aquarium Site...: http://reefs.slickness.org --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:Th

[SAtalk] DNS Timeout Issues

would be helpful to note if Razor, DCC, or others timed out in the same painful way. Cheers, David. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.c

Re: [SAtalk] DNS Timeout Issues

e scheme may work out well I'll take my rbl_timeout line > out when I upgrade and let it be the default value. That sounds good, but will the debug switch show you which test is timing out so you CAN disable it quickly? I found it pretty hard to figure out which test

[SAtalk] Tests against envelope sender?

Do the header tests include the envelope sender? If so, what is it called? Thanks, David --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf

[SAtalk] AWL much slower in 2.60?

ial scans or other nasties are happening? Perhaps when the AWL is updated, as opposed to merely referenced? Any pointers/debugging to do, please let me know! Thanks, David. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek h

[SAtalk] AWL much slower in 2.60?

disks out. Any pointers/debugging to do, please let me know! Thanks, David. --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Spamassassin-t

[SAtalk] debugging spamd

spamd[14396]: debug: auto-learn? no: inside auto-learn thresholds or safety zone around required_hits ... Any suggestions welcomed! Thanks, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://t

[SAtalk] Re: debugging spamd

Okay, figured it out. It's the ORBS RBL. It wasn't responding. Once I removed it, things went very quick again. The debug documentation could be a little clearer. Thanks, David --- David Parr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > Sometime late last week or e

[SAtalk] sa-learn bayesian filtering and virtual users system

. David Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.asguard.org.uk http://www.site-control.org Get my public GPG key from http://www.asguard.org.uk/~david/david.asc Fingerprint: 432E 4EAD E1E5 26BB 29EB 47FA CBDE AB17 0D23 C76B --- This sf.net email is

[SAtalk] Setting sa-learn bayes db path

h i cant set it a user_prefs file. I do definately want a separate bayes db per user and eventually id like t have learning done by a cron job. If there is a good reason not to cron job this please tell me. Many thanks - -- David Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.asguard.org.uk http://www.s

[SAtalk] Wierdness

David Rodgers --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php

Re: [SAtalk] Is there a way to reject a message before it arrives?

it's not the nice way to do it but if you are trying to get rid of spam from a particular source you can set a firewall rule with ipf/iptables etc to reject smtp connections from the ip address and it will never make it to the mail daemon let alone the mail queue for processing. David Ro

[SAtalk] System crashing with spamd

Also, all of the memory related issues I've seen in the archives say that memory is affected slowly over time. In my case it crashes the system consistently within a minute from a single e-mail. Can anyone offer any guidance here? Thanks, David ---

RE: [SAtalk] System crashing with spamd

he culprit though because I still see it sitting at the top of 'top' with 90%+ memory usage right before the machine locks up / freezes. I really want to use SA here! Anyone else have any ideas as to why its killing my box? Thanks, David > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL

Re: [SAtalk] Any Idea When RH RPMs are coming out?

These RPMs worked on my RH9 system http://spamassassin.rediris.es/released/RPMs/ David Rodgers On Mon, 2003-10-13 at 21:06, Bill Polhemus wrote: > I really would prefer to implement something as complex as SA through the > RPMs on my Red Hat 9 system. So far, they are only up to SA 2.55

Re: [SAtalk] Any Idea When RH RPMs are coming out?

Spamassassin developers also include a spec file in the tarball so you can also build rpms on your redhat system from the spamassassin tarball by doing this rpmbuild -tb Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60.tar.gz it will build rpms and put them in /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/i386/ David Rodgers On Mon, 2003-10

RE: [SAtalk] System crashing with spamd

o make any difference yesterday. I was still crashing within an hour, bayes commented or not. Well anyway, the updated DB_File seems to have taken care of it. Thanks for your help on this. David > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Beh

Re: [SAtalk] SA-LEARN (SA 2.60) "Segmentation Fault"

t;craps out" claiming "segmentation fault." > > > Anyone have any ideas? > > > > > > > William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E. > > Polhemus Engineering Company > > Katy, Texas USA - -- David Leggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.asguard.org.uk http://www.s

RE: [SAtalk] Spamassassin updates

kage? 3.Will I gain a significant performance gain by compiling this myself. If your answers are Yes, No and No (which is often the case) than factored with the ease of update when vendor supplied binary packages are available you would be an idiot not to use them. just my 2 pennies David Rodg

[SAtalk] Off Topic BUT packages vs source

kage? 3.Will I gain a significant performance gain by compiling this myself. If your answers are Yes, No and No (which is often the case) than factored with the ease of update when vendor supplied binary packages are available you would be an idiot not to use them. just my 2 pennies David Rodg

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin updates

but just uses the ftp mirrors David Rodgers On Thu, 2003-10-16 at 13:17, Roger Merchberger wrote: > At 12:45 10/16/2003 -0400, Terry Milnes wrote: > >Hold it a sec, not all rpms contain the source, in fact unless things have > >changed I thought that most contained precompiled bin

Re: [SAtalk] Perl & MySQL - Spamassassin doesn't use mysql based user prefs

happier than they have ever been at what we can do especially with the sql support in the exellent interface webuserprefs David Rodgers - Original Message - From: "Arlo Gilbert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 6:11 PM

[SAtalk] Many headers

-stamp: XSJOPQPKDANBPKOWGRR X-transfer-number: 6959198967956415 _ David Watson, Network Manager, Team17 Software Ltd. Phone: +44-1924-267776 Fax: +44-1924-

Re: [SAtalk] Problems installing SpamAssassin 2.6

t is doing for the Open > Source Community? Make a contribution, and help us add new > features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ > ___ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourcef

[SAtalk] Rule for looking at envelope sender?

of [EMAIL PROTECTED].com I tried "blacklist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]" but that didn't work. Thanks, David --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does

RE: [SAtalk] Rule for looking at envelope sender?

From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > At 03:40 PM 10/29/2003, David Hubbard wrote: > >How can one look at the envelope sender of a message > >in a rule? Is there a variable available to SA for > >that? > > That's fundamentally impossible in Spam

[SAtalk] Bayesian question

I apologize if this is a dumb question, or a FAQ, but I just install 2.5 on my main server, and after teaching the bayes stuff, I got this report on a ham email I ran through: -15.30 points, 5 required; * -3.1 -- User-Agent header indicates a non-spam MUA (Outlook Express) * -3.2 -- Has a In-Rep

Re: [SAtalk] Reply to list (was Re: SA & Postfix - Part II)

LuKreme wrote: On Monday, Feb 17, 2003, at 18:01 Canada/Mountain, David Dellanave wrote: Would someone please fix the Reply-To: header for the SA list so you can just click Reply and it replies to the list, not the sender. Sure: Put this in your procmailrc :0 * ^List-Id:.*spamassassin-talk

Re: [SAtalk] Just discovered something very unfortunate .. hee hee

On Fri, Feb 21, 2003 at 10:24:20PM +0100, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote: > On Fri, 21 Feb 2003 the voices made Matt Kettler write: > > MK> Of course, said auto-delete procmail recipe is actually strongly advised > MK> AGAINST by the actual developers of SA. SA's false-pos rate is not > MK> sufficiently

Re: [SAtalk] Virtual Users for SQL Prefs

Dave Weiner wrote: David Dellanave wrote: On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 06:56:23PM -0500, Rick Macdougall wrote: Hi, How are your calling spamc or spamassassin ? spamd with -q -u filter -x -d spamc with -f Try calling spamc like this: spamc -f -u [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dave That only works if you only

[SAtalk] Exim 4.1x configuration

hine...any ideas?   Thanks, David         Transport   # Spam Assassinspamcheck:    driver = pipe    command = /usr/sbin/exim -oMr spam-scanned -bS    use_bsmtp = false    transport_filter = /usr/bin/spamc    home_directory = "/tmp"    current_directory = "/tmp"    # mus

Re: [SAtalk] Why did this one get learned?

On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 10:06:58AM -0800, Christopher Eykamp wrote: > I am wondering why the following message was autolearned. The message > scored heavily negative, yet it was learned as spam (which, in fact, it > was, but an error in my whitelist let it slip through). I would not expect > a

[SAtalk] Is forwarding spam to be processed bad?

I'd like to setup some rules in my procmailrc so that I can just forward false negatives (or positives) to david+spam/ham and have a rule that runs it through sa-learn or razor-report. Is forwarding the message going to mess it up in terms of how it is processed? If it is, what's a

Re: [SAtalk] I hate SpamAssassin

Because the economics of spam dictate a solution on the network level. If the mail makes it through to your PC, then the damage is done, it has already consumed bandwidth, space, and time. You may feel marginally inconvenienced, but the fact of the matter is, spam can cost an ISP or a buisnesses te

[SAtalk] SA Help!!! Don't Know Where to Begin

Ack! I'm trying to get SA working on my linux box running sendmail. I have installed SA to the best of my knowledge, but now I have a couple of dilemnas. First, how do I know the installation will work; are there any test scripts I can try? Secondly, how do I send my mail coming into the MTA thro

[SAtalk] Web Interface MySQL For Sitewide Config

Interface to manage it. I've read something about sitewide configs and MySQL in 2.60, Is this true? Also is there a Web Interface out there somewhere for sitewide preferences? Thanks, David --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, make

Re: [SAtalk] Really OT: Microsoft buys out RAV

Based on what? From what I have heard SCO has no valid complaint as Novell was the true license holder (and still is). - Original Message - From: "Peter P. Benac" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Chris Barnes'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "'SpamAssassin'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003

[SAtalk] How can create spamcheck.user ?

Hi there, I am just finish install all packages (Spamassassin +MIMEDefang +Sendmail +Qpopper +procmail) on Sun Solaris 9. everything doing well, but now I need to create /etc/mail/spamcheck.users, what is this file look like ? Thanks David

[SAtalk] spamd

version 2.55) ..... Thanks David --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here: http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 ___ Spamassassin-

[SAtalk] spamassassin delete spam mail automatically

Hi there, My spamassassin +MIMEDefang working fine, but I have a problem, it is the probably-spam mail was deleted automatically, It is any way I can configure it do not automatic delete when the message tagged spam, because I want check it before omit it. Thanks David

RE: [SAtalk] Whitelist using LDAP server

hitelist your ldap users without > altering any SA code. SA-Exim would do that with inclusion in the > exception rule, Postfix with a custom transport. It's always possible, the question is whether it's worth the complexity when you could just do it in SA. After all, SA has a whit

Re: [SAtalk] Whitelist using LDAP server

ail and Smail left - > those people would have to do the same. Just because you *can* do it in the MTA doesn't mean it *belongs* in the MTA. David. -- David Luyer Phone: +61 3 9674 7525 Network Development ManagerP A C I F I CFax: +61

Re: [SAtalk] OK, this Nigerian takes the cake, hands down!

That was probably added after they started receiving complaints from recipients of this scam. - Original Message - From: Chris Santerre To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail) Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 11:36 AM Subject: [SAtalk] OK, this Nigerian takes the cake, hands d

RE: [SAtalk] Learning from forwarded mail

can be done. Open the message in its own window, rather then viewing in the preview window. Actions, Resend This Message, answer Yes to the Popup, and then send it to your learning account. David -- David C Prall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dcp.dcptech.com --

[SAtalk] sa-learn options

sa-learn has the following options... --hamLearn message as ham (non-spam) --spam Learn message as spam I realize this is being picky, but neither one of those is kosher :-) Could we maybe have a --beef or --pastrami option for those of us who avoid pork? David C

Re: [SAtalk] Ideas on dealing with Joe Job?

Technically speaking you could go after the spammer/spamvertized site for identity theft and defamation of character. In fact I wouldn't hesitate, you have nothing to loose. - Original Message - From: "Abigail Marshall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 23, 20

Re: [SAtalk] I'm fed up with Viagra spam ...

Spammers stick to what they know generally...screwing people, not protecting them. - Original Message - From: "Tony Earnshaw" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2003 8:06 AM Subject: [SAtalk] I'm fed up with Viagra spam ... > ... time for new spam type

Re: [SAtalk] Ideas on dealing with Joe Job?

ttp://www.panix.com/e-spam.html#headers http://combat.uxn.com/tracing.html http://home.att.net/~marjie1/headers.htm You can also copy-and-paste the headers into the online service at http://spamcop.net/ . It does a pretty good job decoding them, pointing out which headers are prob

[SAtalk] Procmail+Spamassassin Recipe

Hi, OS: Redhat Linux 9.0 KERNEL: 2.4.20-smp MTA:Exim 3.36 SPAM: SpamAssassin 2.55 PROCMAIL: Procmail 3.22 HOW OUR MAIL WORKS -- USERS: 4000 DOMAINS:160 Each users mail resides in /var/spool/mail/$LOGNAME I have se

[SAtalk] Attachment headers in body, rawbody, or header?

Hello, I'm trying to write a rule based on the Content-Type: or Content-Disposition: header. Often, though, the headers I want are not in the top of the email, but in the attached part of the email, after the text, under the message boundary. Does SpamAssassin check these headers using the head

RE: [SAtalk] Bug 1927 - spamd looping - v2.54

it was doing fine for the longest time and then all of the sudden started hanging hard. Looking at processes I will see a number of spamd processes running, but no spamc or procmail running to associate with the spamd processes. I moved from 2.54 to 2.55 to se

[SAtalk] Procmail+Spamassassin on global domain basis

Hi, OS: Redhat Linux 9.0 KERNEL: 2.4.20-smp MTA:Exim 3.36 SPAM: SpamAssassin 2.55 PROCMAIL: Procmail 3.22 HOW OUR MAIL WORKS -- USERS: 4000 DOMAINS:160 Each users mail resides in /var/spool/mail/$LOGNAME I have se

[SAtalk] Spamassassin + Procmail per domain basis help

fhw | sed -e '1s/^/F/' } # Accept all the rest to default mailbox :0 $DEFAULT Kind regards, David Jacobson System Architect Imperial Online - The Imperial Connection (+27) 11 723-8181 Helpdesk (+27) 11 454 1236

[SAtalk] Missed Spam samples

My site has been receiving some odd spam with little to no content, increasing amounts over the last fortnight (2 shown below). Is this something other people are seeing? Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivery-date: Wed, 09 Jul 2003 15:15:09 +0100 Received: from machiavelli.team17.com ([192

[SAtalk] [RD] rule discussion

continue to use SAtalk? I think we should. Maybe just put [RD] in the subject for rule discussion? I did the wiki thing, That is kinda cool ;) Chris Santerre ... http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/sa_rules.htm I didn't know there was a wiki until you pointed it out. Cool. Thanks for setting up

[SAtalk] HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE

I just received the spam below. Shouldnt a white font trigger HTML_FONT_INVISIBLE if there is no bgcolor set? humidistat millenarian tax bart talus menopause cot hunches bounteously cotton hotrod atwater admonished coverage berwick accountable admirations crags horsely savager populati

RE: [SAtalk] FBI fraud reporting site

formation Center http://www.fraud.org/ ? -- David Cary --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBO

RE: [SAtalk] user prefs file {Scanned}

Thank you, I was able to edit Mailscanner and add to the list. Thanks, David On Tue, 2003-08-05 at 13:51, Ian Douglas wrote: > > I'm new to spamassassin. I'm using spamassassin and sendmail installed > > from redhat 9. I also have Mailscanner installed. It looks like &g

  1   2   3   4   5   >