Hi,
I need to learn, that for SAhelp I need to change the To:, Grrr.
- Forwarded message from Claudio Clemens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 11:33:03PM -0700, Michael Moncur wrote:
> > This is possible, but many (okay, I) consider it arrogant, obnoxious
> > and just general
SpamTalk said:
> If the load is that large it would probably justify a hardware or dedicated
> software load-balancing solution. Doesn't Red hat appears to have an
> "active" load balancing solution:
> http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/advserver/RHLAS-2.1-Manual/install-guide/
> s1-lvs-schedulin
Tony Hoyle wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Wiplinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 21 November 2002 13:50
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Is to identify yourself by return email necessary in
the future?
I just come accross the article at
http://slate.msn.com/?id=2074042
Bob Amen wrote:
Some mail clients (the version of Mozilla I'm running, among them)
don't allow one to filter on a user defined header. Only the standard
ones are in the pull down list.
WHAT version? Mine works great!
version 1.0.
You have to create a custom header first.
--
shale
Michael Moncur wrote:
I wouldn't object to using a TMDA-like system on suspected spam (say,
anything scoring 5 to 10). The trouble with that is that SpamAssassin works
so well, I've only had about 5 false positives in the last two months, and
all of them were automated emails that wouldn't have
Mike Leone wrote:
Steve Thomas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) had this to say on 11/20/02 at 13:18:
| X-Spam-Status is ok with Yes, hits required but how do i get rid
| of the tests= part?
procmail/formail, or hack the SA code.
| I do not want the report at all in the message body how do u get
| rid of
I was able to finally get this to work and thats a major victory over
here.
Now, I was also able to get the web interface to work but it never
updates the sql db and its missing /users/spamfilter/index.php. The
documentation on this interface is next to nil so I would love to know
what you did to
> "SpamArchive.org has just been launched. SpamArchive.org is a
> community resource that provides a database of known spam to be
> used for testing, developing, and benchmarking anti-spam tools.
> The goal of this project is to provide a large repository of spam
> that can be used by researc
Diffenderfer, Randy wrote:
"SpamArchive.org has just been launched. SpamArchive.org is a
community resource that provides a database of known spam to be
used for testing, developing, and benchmarking anti-spam tools.
The goal of this project is to provide a large repository of spam
that can b
Matt Kettler said:
> I expected the HTML parser might deal with the comment block attack. Will
> it also deal with the "white-on-white text" variant? (you didn't include
> both scenarios from my original email, so I'm adding the other back in below)
don't think it does now, from what I recall
I got it working, and it's fairly easy, just make all the forms in the
phpsa.php file point to itself. It will miraculously start to work.
The references to the other files are simply wrong (or outdated) whatever.
I'm by the way working on that file to make it a bit more useful. Like
- As a
>write SpamAssassin in such a way that these existing tools do the job
Hardware solution would be transparent, mo special accommodation. I would
think that a cluster would integrate similarly seamlessly, cant say from
experience, just from what I have read.
You just have to make your choice. The so
> And what about "password" Subjects? spamfilter has such a feature. If
> the user is wanting to send you something (and you have realy no idea
> who he is), he may find your address in the web, and the following
> comment: If you are sending your first e-mail to me, please write the
> following "p
Diffenderfer, Randy said:
> Consider this -- if this were a front for a bunch on enterprising spammers,
> it might be a wonderful source of __valid__ addresses of all the poor folks
> who send in their spam!
>
> It could happen... :-)
It could, but not in this case -- it seems to be IronPort, wh
> But can you afford to drop all spam?
> The ideal to reach is to /dev/null spam, not just copy it for
> sorting through later on...
I already effectively 'drop' everything with a score over 20, which accounts
for 90% of my spam, over 100 messages a day.
In practice, those messages go to a folde
This came in on the NANOG mailing list yesterday. Interesting, although I
think it's a bit conspiracy-theory-ish. Scroll to "Final food for thought".
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Barry Shein
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2002 11:38 AM
To
(I'm resending this without the full 'spam' attached - I have a feeling it
tripped everyones SA filters, and I didn't recieve the message myself.. ;)
I'm extremely surprised but a 'Extend your auto warranty SPAM only scored a
2.9. Two questions: How do I report false negatives using a Windoz box
Justin Mason said the following on 22/11/02 15:59:
Diffenderfer, Randy said:
Consider this -- if this were a front for a bunch on enterprising spammers,
it might be a wonderful source of __valid__ addresses of all the poor folks
who send in their spam!
It could happen... :-)
It could, but not
I installed SA (v 2.43, Linux, i386) but spamc is not playing nice with
spamd.
I can redirect a message to spamassassin and get a successful parse (with
all the usual SA diagnostics inserted.
[root@gromit bin]# spamassassin < /tmp/outfile
Number of lines: 9
Relative Line Numbers (in percent): 12.
On Fri, 22 Nov 2002 the voices made Justin Mason write:
> Still, it'd be nice to know *what* they plan to do with it, how they plan
> to make it available to other antispam filter devvers without giving it
> all away to spammers, and if they have any plans for QAing the submitted
> spam -- it's ve
I have two questions:
1) How can you see what words are generating the spam phrase
hits and how can you disable individual words?
2) shouldn't the below numbers be in order?
ie. why does 00_01 score higher that 01_02 and
why is 55_XX the second lowest?
50_scores.cf:score SPAM_P
The mailfilter below is setup for a catch all and if .JunkMail dir exists it puts the
spam there if it doesn't it goes to the users inbox.
qmail+vpopmail+sqwebmail+qmailadmin+maildrop+spamassassin..
Now the question if username has the catch all account. but if we send an email to an
account t
Hi everyone. I've been putting Spamassassin 2.31-16 through it's paces
using the never-ending source of spam that is Hotmail. I have been
using Gotmail to fetch my email and pipe it through SA. I have been
using the RedHat 8.0 defaults (spamassassin score > 5 = spam).
In four weeks I have re
I do something a little different. I have a script called whitelist
that adds the domain or email to the local.cf file for me. The script
is called /usr/local/sbin/whitelist. I created a soft link from there
to /usr/local/sbin/blacklist so I can maintain a single file.
Here's the script. If
Is there a way to set a limit on how many emails 1 person can send at once?
For example i want to set it to 25.
I want to send 50 emails
I can only send 25 people emails at once.
Then i would have to create another email to send another 25
I only want users to be able to send 25 emails at 1 time
> "MB" == Mathew Binkley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MB> Hi everyone. I've been putting Spamassassin 2.31-16 through it's paces
MB> using the never-ending source of spam that is Hotmail. I have been
[ ... ]
MB> I hope it's of use to the SA guys.
I think it is about as useful as reporting
Eudora mbx files can be converted to unix mbox format for processing with
spamassassin -r using eudora2unix.pl. Dump your offending email into it's
own mailbox, ftp the .mbx file to a unix system, covert it, and
spamassassin -r it.
I don't know of any better way, and forwarding it to a "report"
Whoops, forgot to include where to get eudora2unix:
http://www.xs4all.nl/~maryniak/eudora2unix/
(obtained via searching freshmeat.net. I use this tool to convert my eudora
mailboxes for use as a small corpus for rule development.)
---
This s
Agreed, using 2.31 isn't a particularly useful baseline. But the data may
be somewhat useful.
It's not hard to run a mass check against this with 2.43 and screen out the
ones that are still FN.
I'll try doing that when I have a chance, and try to post some statistics,
and maybe make the result
--On Friday, November 22, 2002 4:36 PM -0500 Vivek Khera
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it is about as useful as reporting virii missed by several
> months old antivirus software... SA has advanced significantly since
> 2.31, and spam has evolved since then too.
I ran his corpus through my
Good I got this to work finally and the problem was username
varchar(8) NOT NULL inside the file spamassassin.sql. Not many users
only have 8 or less chars in their usernames so I set it to 30 and all
works fine now (I think).
Thanks all.
--
spamc[2982]: spamd responded with bad string 'Number of lines: 16'
The number of lines has went to 8x before and its in my maillog. Does
it with passed or spam messages.
Thanks.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek
I'm new to spamassassin. Is there a web interface that might be
configurable per user? I'm currently running Postfix + amavisd-new +
spamassassin + uvscan. I would love to be able to find a web interface
so that users can customize their spam settings (changing the scoring)
and be able to check
At 02:00 PM 11/22/2002 -0600, Jon Gabrielson wrote:
I have two questions:
1) How can you see what words are generating the spam phrase
hits and how can you disable individual words?
If you have a particular email you want to check you should be able to get
the matches using spamassassin -tD
Well, I got SA to work somewhat. It reads (or rather acts like it
reads) the mysql database and this is in my maillog
identified spam (12.0/5.0) for blahblah:510 in 3.2 seconds, 7277 bytes.
so far so good but the preference for blahblah is to write ***SPAM*** in
the header and it doesn't do that
I noticed a few people on the net and 1 in this group and now me that
have to use spamd with the -D debug option on or our messages are never
parsed. Is there a reason for this as it makes the maillog quite large.
I tried everything I could think of over here to no avail. I tried
contacting seve
Hi,
I've setup another server to try out version 2.5.0. I already trained it to
identify spam but not yet non-spam messages. How do I know it's working?
---
francis a. vidal [bitstop network services] | http://www.bitstop.ph
streaming media + web hosting | http://www.keystone.ph
37 matches
Mail list logo
