--On Friday, November 22, 2002 4:36 PM -0500 Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it is about as useful as reporting virii missed by several > months old antivirus software... SA has advanced significantly since > 2.31, and spam has evolved since then too. I ran his corpus through my new 2.43 installation and got this: formail -s spamc < false* | grep X-Spam-Status X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.0 required=5.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.0 required=5.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=5.0 X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=9.0 required=5.0 X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.0 required=5.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0 X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=8.6 required=5.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=7.3 required=5.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.1 required=5.0 X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=5.3 required=5.0 X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=6.0 required=5.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.1 required=5.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.7 required=5.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.1 required=5.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.3 required=5.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.1 required=5.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.4 required=5.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.7 required=5.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.2 required=5.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.1 required=5.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.7 required=5.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.1 required=5.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.7 required=5.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.1 required=5.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.7 required=5.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.1 required=5.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.1 required=5.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.7 required=5.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.7 required=5.0 ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
