>write SpamAssassin in such a way that these existing tools do the job Hardware solution would be transparent, mo special accommodation. I would think that a cluster would integrate similarly seamlessly, cant say from experience, just from what I have read. You just have to make your choice. The software is a lot more work to set up and maintain, the hardware costs more but should install far more simply and you can get support and hardware maintenance.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 6:50 AM To: SpamTalk Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Distribute the load SpamTalk said: > If the load is that large it would probably justify a hardware or > dedicated software load-balancing solution. Doesn't Red hat appears to > have an "active" load balancing solution: > http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/advserver/RHLAS-2.1-Manual/install- > guide/ > s1-lvs-scheduling.html > http://makeashorterlink.com/?B31852682 > > Hardware wise, you could probably pick up a couple Cisco local > redirector at auction. I assume this stuff is important and you need > redundancy and failover. > > This is certainly not an issue to dedicate SA gurus against. It's been > done, why re-invent the wheel? It's also important to note that our position is to write SpamAssassin in such a way that these existing tools do the job, so as to avoid wheel-reinvention! --j. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
