SpamTalk said: > If the load is that large it would probably justify a hardware or dedicated > software load-balancing solution. Doesn't Red hat appears to have an > "active" load balancing solution: > http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/advserver/RHLAS-2.1-Manual/install-guide/ > s1-lvs-scheduling.html > http://makeashorterlink.com/?B31852682 > > Hardware wise, you could probably pick up a couple Cisco local redirector at > auction. I assume this stuff is important and you need redundancy and > failover. > > This is certainly not an issue to dedicate SA gurus against. It's been done, > why re-invent the wheel?
It's also important to note that our position is to write SpamAssassin in such a way that these existing tools do the job, so as to avoid wheel-reinvention! --j. ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
