Hi Ed:
It should do all that you've said as long as you have your mail delivery
thing set up correctly. I personally use procmail for local mail
delivery, and all it does is pipe all incoming messages to spamc. After
spamc is done with the emails, it spits it back out. If they're marked
as spa
On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 11:36:19PM -0800, Ed Kasky wrote:
> I just want to be sure that it passes the mail to the recipient even if it
> reaches the set threshold. Right now I have it set so this way so that
> each user on the system can be sure that nothing got tagged by mistake
> before dele
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 06, 2002 at 11:36:19PM -0800, Ed Kasky wrote:
> > I just want to be sure that it passes the mail to the recipient even if it
> > reaches the set threshold. Right now I have it set so this way so that
> > each user on the system can be su
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 08:17:15AM -0700, ed wrote:
> I have just started reporting the spam myself as well but guess I should
> start checking more carefully to see if it's been reported already before
> I do it manually.
There's no harm in reporting a mail more than once. Just make sure it's
s
I am trying to run SpamAssassin v2.20 using spamd via spamc
in /etc/procmailrc. I am running spamd as root so that spamd has access
to the .spamassassin directory in my users' home directories.
When the message is processed by spamd the following message appears in my
mail log:
spamd[21924]: S
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 06:52:15PM -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote:
>On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 05:33:44PM -0800, Sidney Markowitz wrote:
>> Christopher Faylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Can I point out that it is probably possible to use spamassassin on
>> > Windows, if you run it under Cygwin (www
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Craig,
My ISP had a massive outage and I never did see if the ls -ld helped you
Sean
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE
--- Begin Message ---
Mr Hughes,
> Hi there Paul. I'm currently maintaining the SpamAssassin
> project for Justin Mason while he's off on vacation. He's
> the guy, by the way, who jokingly put the "profit is dirty"
> message on his webpage.
I will adjust the page to reflect that. I'll also
On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 20:55, Paul Myers wrote:
> > 1. SpamAssassin does not block mail. There is no facility
> > for blocking or bouncing mail in SpamAssassin, and blocking
> > or bouncing is highly discouraged both in the documentation,
> > and on the SpamAssassin mailing list.
>
> I'll adjust
I don't remember if I replied or not -- I don't think I did though.
This looks very odd to me. It seems like it should not be having any
trouble reading the file. Try (temporarily) relaxing the ACL on the
directory/file to allow r for all on files, and rx for all on
directories (/etc, /etc/mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07 Apr 2002, Craig Hughes verbalised:
> I don't remember if I replied or not -- I don't think I did though.
> This looks very odd to me. It seems like it should not be having any
> trouble reading the file. Try (temporarily) relaxing the ACL on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07 Apr 2002, Craig Hughes spake thusly:
> I don't remember if I replied or not -- I don't think I did though.
> This looks very odd to me. It seems like it should not be having any
> trouble reading the file. Try (temporarily) relaxing the ACL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07 Apr 2002, Craig Hughes told this:
> I don't remember if I replied or not -- I don't think I did though.
> This looks very odd to me. It seems like it should not be having any
> trouble reading the file. Try (temporarily) relaxing the ACL on
Paul Myers has some reasonable complaints, he argues against ISP's
installing mail filtering without notifying their users or providing an
opt-in / opt-out. That's a very valid problem and probably opens that
ISP to liability.
He also seems to fail to grasp that many spamassassin users are
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 04:43:28PM -0500, Paul Rushing wrote:
> Paul Myers has some reasonable complaints, he argues against ISP's
> installing mail filtering without notifying their users or providing an
> opt-in / opt-out. That's a very valid problem and probably opens that
> ISP to liabili
spamc is started without any command line options and spamd is started
with the '-d -c -a -F0' options.
I am not using SQL.
The only configuration file changes that I made are to the
file /etc/mail/spamassassin/migrated.cf.
Below are the contents of my migrated.cf:
# SpamAssassin rules file,
Hi,
I have installed SA site wide on a RedHat 7.2 server running Sendmail
8.12.2 with procmail as the local mailer. I first installed SA then Razor
and it was working perfectly, then I installed mySQL and started using it
for per user settings which again worked perfectly but now it seems the
On Sun, 2002-04-07 at 18:11, Quinn Vallance wrote:
> Hi,
> I have installed SA site wide on a RedHat 7.2 server running Sendmail
> 8.12.2 with procmail as the local mailer. I first installed SA then Razor
> and it was working perfectly, then I installed mySQL and started using it
> for per user
Been away on vacation and just caught up with this ...
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Sundial Services International, Inc. wrote:
> In other words, this script is going to connect through POP3 to the other
> mail server, get the text of all the pending mail (up to 5MB of data),
> compare and run it through
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 10:20:12PM +0100, Sean Rima wrote:
| For whatever reason I cannot get spamd to bind to the port as any user
| except root.
Only root can bind to ports <1024. It looks like spamd uses 783, thus
it must be root while it binds the socket. It can drop privileges
(setuid())
Paul,
I would like to invite you to be one of the few people on earth to have
a PCsites.com email address at no cost to you. The reason I am making
this offer is this.
I am running Spamassassin 'out of the box' with no customization on my
email server. The only other software that touches and c
On Sun, Apr 07, 2002 at 01:29:35PM -0700, Craig Hughes wrote:
| -- Forwarded Message --
| From: "Paul Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Re: Hi, I am the SpamAssassin maintainer
| Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2002 23:55:51 -0500
| I will also strongly urge people to leave any I
Mr Hughes,
I respected your privacy when you sent your email to my
personal address, rather than the one I provided for public
comments on the issue.
You'll note that no part of your comments were quoted in the
revised version of my article, and your email address (and in
fact, your name) wa
Paul Myers wrote:
> If not, I'd ask that you do so, to correct any errors of
> interpretation your actions may have caused.
I'm pretty sure I just forward the whole message to the list. I've written a
separate letter to you already in response to the one you sent me on the subject
of publish
24 matches
Mail list logo
