This ended up being a local firewall issue that I have resolved. Thanks
for looking.
At 10:21 AM 1/28/2004, James Ervin wrote:
I have two mail servers running spamassassin. One has spamd running and uses:
# send mail through spamassassin
:0fw
| /usr/bin/spamc
This works and I get a nice log in
I have two mail servers running spamassassin. One has spamd running and uses:
# send mail through spamassassin
:0fw
| /usr/bin/spamc
This works and I get a nice log in /var/log/maillog that I can produce
reports on.
The other server has never been setup for spamc, so I changed it to the
above
Robin Lynn Frank wrote:
> I rummaged around the web site looking for material on invoking spamc with
> maildrop, but didn't find anything.
>
> Can someone point me to any documentation on this, or just give me a clue as
> to what must be done in .mailfilter to invoke spamc?
>
This is what I us
> I rummaged around the web site looking for material on invoking spamc with
> maildrop, but didn't find anything.
> Can someone point me to any documentation on this, or just give me a clue as
> to what must be done in .mailfilter to invoke spamc?
xfilter "spamc"
same thing you'd use for invok
(I'm not subscribed to the list. I thought this could be possibly
useful to others.)
SpamAssassin has, for the most part, worked wonderfully in keeping spam
out of the users' mailboxes for three mail domains that I use it on. I
collect all spam into one "spam" mailbox, and someone reviews tha
On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, Robert Menschel wrote:
> Check
> http://www.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#privileged%20settings
> specifically the allow_user_rules setting. If you don't allow user_prefs
> rules, then no spamd/spamc execution will use them.
>
> DE> I thought perhaps spamc/s
Hello Daniel,
Tuesday, December 30, 2003, 1:28:29 PM, you wrote:
DE> I recently added some personal rules to my user_prefs and tested them
DE> by running a few mail messages through spamassassin. They seem to
DE> work fine, but I'm still getting the spam and the rules aren't getting
DE> trigger
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 04:28:29PM -0500, Daniel Ellard wrote:
> I thought perhaps spamc/spamd wasn't looking at my user_prefs, but
> this doesn't seem to the problem -- my whitelist and blacklist entries
> still are working as always. The only flags to spamd are -d and -L,
> so I don't see a prob
I recently added some personal rules to my user_prefs and tested them
by running a few mail messages through spamassassin. They seem to
work fine, but I'm still getting the spam and the rules aren't getting
triggered. I've tracked this down to an apparent difference between
spamc and spamassassi
Hi all,
I'm using SA 1.61 & postfix 2.0.16 on a Debian woody box. I want to
test it on
a site with about 150 mails per minute. I tested it for a few
minutes, but
from 410 mails only 385 are scanned from spamd. None are skipped due
to the size.
I used the config from Security Sage.
spamd is
spamassassin -t < spam.mail shows the bayes score, high scores as
spam
spamc -y -u qscand < spam.mail does not show the bayes score, does not
score high as spam
I'm using qmail, qmail-scanner 1.20
running spamd as user qscand
After reading the spamd readme, I set local.cf to:
bayes_path /var/qsc
You could use procmail to call spamc, eg. .qmail-user files look like this:
| preline procmail -t -p ./the_users_name_here/Maildir/procmailrc
and the user's procmailrc:
LOGFILE=/var/log/procmail
VERBOSE=ON
### Spam Assassin
:0fw
* < 256000
| /usr/bin/spamc -u the_users_name_here -f
:0
*
./th
Hi.
I've tried to run Spamassassin (spamc/spamd) with vpopmail on a per-user
basis by adding the following line to the .qmail- file:
| spamc | /var/vmail/bin/vdelivermail '' bounce-no-mailbox
but unfortunately qmail refused to deliver any messages complaining in the
log:
qmail: 1071234685
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Raquel Rice wrote:
> I've tried several times to run spamc from a site-wide procmailrc.
> It just hangs. This is what I have in the /etc/procmailrc:
>
> :0fw
> * < 256000
> | spamc
>
> and I've made certain to have started spamd.
You don't say how
Hello, I have this as my filter.sh file under postfix and it works just find. The log
file /tmp/currentspamlist.txt holds each transaction that we have. What I would like
to do is to also capture weather or not the email was a spam. I was thinking that I
could make a second call to spamc with
At 02:26 PM 12/1/2003, Douglas Kirkland wrote:
I am confused about how the -d setting works in spamc. Can I set two
different domains for the domain setting in spamc without using DNS for the
two spamd servers?
I was think I could have the setting like:
spamc -d primary.spamd.com, secondary.spamd
At 04:12 PM 12/1/2003, Douglas Kirkland wrote:
If i understand this now. By using DNS then one server will be used for the
most of the time because it will want to use the IP address that it got from
the first lookup of the DNS address?
adding -H will cause it to randomize the order of the result
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Monday 01 December 2003 12:54, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 02:26 PM 12/1/2003, Douglas Kirkland wrote:
> >I am confused about how the -d setting works in spamc. Can I set two
> >different domains for the domain setting in spamc without using DNS for t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am confused about how the -d setting works in spamc. Can I set two
different domains for the domain setting in spamc without using DNS for the
two spamd servers?
I was think I could have the setting like:
spamc -d primary.spamd.com, secondary.sp
Hello,
sorry to say that this is not the first post of mine to show a bug in spamc
with mysql support.
Spamc with mysql support have to duplicate the same set of filtering
rules/setting on .cf file from mysql before getting the user-based rules
works.
I have to conditionally restart spamassassinc
Hi,
I am very new to Spamassassin. I just installed Spamassassin on a Solaris 7 box. I
use Qmail and I'm using Qmail scanner. My problem is that I cannot seem to get SPAMC
to run for my mail. If I run the test that was supplied with qmail-scanner, it works
(this uses qmail-inject). When I
Hello,
I am trying to integrate the cyrus-imapd virtual user and their own
user-defined filter.
spamc can now specify the rule by a specified user with "-u"
ie. spamc -u [EMAIL PROTECTED]
eg. /etc/postfix/master.cf
spamc -f -u $(recipient} -e ...
The spamd is started with -x -q option to connecti
Hello,
I am trying to integrate the cyrus-imapd virtual user and their own
user-defined filter.
spamc can now specify the rule by a specified user with "-u"
ie. spamc -u [EMAIL PROTECTED]
eg. /etc/postfix/master.cf
spamc -f -u $(recipient} -e ...
The spamd is started with -x -q option to
I'm confused by the documentation on spamc and the results of different
spamc options. I'm using SA 2.60 and qmail-scanner 1.20rc3
When I use qmail-scanner calling spamc with the -c option, only
qmail-scanner tags the email, and all site-wide settings in local.cf seem to
be ignored by spamd. For
Hi,
I have been running some performance tests on spamc/spamd and I wanted to make sure my
results were consistent with expected performance. All tests were run on:
Dual 2.8 Ghz Xeon (4 logical CPUs) box w/2GB RAM
Redhat 8.0, Spam Assassin 2.60
I've been using the spamc/spamd combination.
Hi,
I have been running some performance tests on spamc/spamd and I wanted to make sure my
results were consistent with expected performance. All tests were run on:
Dual 2.8 Ghz Xeon (4 logical CPUs) box w/2GB RAM
Redhat 8.0, Spam Assassin 2.60
I've been using the spamc/spamd combination.
Please remember not to post in HTML.
"Fred I-IS.COM" wrote:
> ---cut---
> When spamd receives a connection, it spawns a child to handle the
> request. The child will expect to read an email message from the
> network socket, which should then be closed for writing on the other
I need help from the dev team!
In the docs for spamD, it has the following:
---cut---
When spamd receives a connection, it spawns a child to handle
the request. The child will expect to read an email message from the
network socket, which should then be closed for writing on the other end (so
to run as qmailq.
-Jeremy
-Original Message-
From: AltGrendel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 25, 2003 8:19 AM
To: SA-Talk
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spamc/spamd question on a qmail gateway
On Sat, 2003-08-23 at 04:44, Joe Cave wrote:
> Dear list,
> I'm having some p
On Sat, 2003-08-23 at 04:44, Joe Cave wrote:
> Dear list,
> I'm having some problems getting spamc/spamd working on a qmail gateway. I'm
> wondering what is the most lightweight way to get mail scanned and then re-injected
> back into the qmail-queue? I have qmail patched to work with the QMAILQU
Dear list,
I'm having some problems getting spamc/spamd working on a qmail gateway. I'm wondering
what is the most lightweight way to get mail scanned and then re-injected back into
the qmail-queue? I have qmail patched to work with the QMAILQUEUE variable. If I point
my QMAILQUEUE to spamc noth
Hiya
I’ve configured spamc to
use a host that resolves to 2 addresses, and I’m seeing something odd
when the spamd server at the first address isn’t
running.
I twiddled with libspamc.c and
defined DO_CONNECT_DEBUG_SYSLOGS, and have recorded the following:
Aug 20 18:24:16 horus2
Hi,
I reported the same problem some day ago ("Difference between Spamc and
spamassassin on Win32") but did not get a reply. I think it's a small
change to spamc only.
Klaus
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites inc
Hi,
I reported the same problem some day ago ("Difference between Spamc and
spamassassin on Win32") but did not get a reply. I think it's a small
change only.
Klaus
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Da
Greetings,
Anyone know the magic to get spamc to operate as
spamassassin re: spamassassin --exit-code ?
just replacing spamassassin with spamc doesn't
do it in my mail delivery script. I need to
use a different script path if spam, and although
spamc < msg > newmsg
if spamc -c
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Sill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 10:17 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spamc/spamd not checking all messages
>
> I use:
>
> #!/bin/sh
>
> exec /usr/local/bin/softli
"Dallas L. Engelken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Dave Sill wrote:
>>
>> What's happening is that some spam (~5-10/day out of 60-70)
>> is not being checked correctly by spamd. For example, an
>> obvious spam contains the header field:
>>
>> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 required=0
>
> why not ru
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Sill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 8:03 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] spamc/spamd not checking all messages
>
>
> I'm using 2.55 under Red Hat 8 and qmail with qmail-scanner-1
On Wed, 2003-07-30 at 09:02, Dave Sill wrote:
> I'm using 2.55 under Red Hat 8 and qmail with qmail-scanner-1.16. I
> *think* this problem started when I upgraded to 2.55 from 2.50, but
> I'm not sure. I'm using nearly the same configuration at home and not
> seeing this problem.
>
> What's happen
I'm using 2.55 under Red Hat 8 and qmail with qmail-scanner-1.16. I
*think* this problem started when I upgraded to 2.55 from 2.50, but
I'm not sure. I'm using nearly the same configuration at home and not
seeing this problem.
What's happening is that some spam (~5-10/day out of 60-70) is not
bein
Jul 14 00:00:42 lonestar spamc[73960]: connect() to spamd at 207.135.64.67
failed, retrying (1/3): Connection refused
Jul 14 00:00:43 lonestar spamc[73960]: connect() to spamd at 207.135.127.67
failed, retrying (2/3): Invalid argument
Jul 14 00:00:44 lonestar spamc[73960]: connect() to spamd at 2
14, 2003 4:30
AM
To: Tony Bunce;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Spamc on
remote host
Never thought about
that... only tested when the host was up. However, I only get a 10-12 second
timeout now when testing against a downed IP. I'm then running the spamc
service in a po
fferent version since you get 4 lines on
one spamc session, while my setup only logs two lines.
Thomas
-Original Message-From: Tony Bunce
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 5:34
PMTo: Thomas Nilsen;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Spamc
on remote host
?
513.934.2800
1.888.ON.GO.YET
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Nilsen
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July
11, 2003 11:26 AM
To: Tony Bunce
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Spamc on
remote host
Use the timeout switch
when calling spamc. Mail will then be delivered as normal, but
Is anyone here using spamc on a remote host system wide?
If so what are you doing to ensure that if the spamd system
fails that mail will still be delivered?
Thanks,
Tony B, CCNA, Network+
Systems Administration
GO Concepts, Inc. / www.go-concepts.com
Are you on the GO yet?
W
Hello,
We
have been using spamassassin sitewide for sometime now on our 3 mail servers
and have been very pleased with it. The only issue that we have had is that
when our primary mail server gets flooded with spam it would run up the cpu
slowing the server down to unusable
Hi,
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 10:26:28 +0200 Buscema Guido
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to set up spamc/spamd with postfix by piping a shell script
> inside master.cf file of postfix.
> I created a user "filter" and a directory /var/spool/filter.
> I also created a directory ( /opt/
Hi,
I'm trying to set up spamc/spamd with postfix by piping a shell script
inside master.cf file of postfix.
I created a user "filter" and a directory /var/spool/filter.
I also created a directory ( /opt/spamfilter ) with the following shell
script (filter.sh)
SENDMAIL="/usr/lib/sendmail -i"
SPAM
- Original Message -
From: "Dr. Ongo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Spam Assassin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 11:08 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] spamc/spamd per user config files
> Hello
>
> I'm using the spamc/spamd combo wi
Hello
I'm using the spamc/spamd combo with postfix as an inbound relay.
Postfix runs spamc as user 'filter' and messages that spamd is changing to
that user can be seen in the log
My reading of "man spamd" that .. "spamd will check per-user config files
for every message"
has lead me to make ent
Stuart Gall wrote:
Where did you get that idea ?
spamc respects the user_prefs and local.cf files.
The only issue might be if you want user based configuration and you are running spamc
as mail or something
but this should be configureable on the MTA.
Oh. The docs (which I don't have in front of
I'm currently using spamc/spamd here to filter the mail. This is a
small place (only about 80 customers), so I was able to run the
mailserver on a P2 450 without problems. When i started running
spamassassin (on a per user basis), the machine started really bogging
down - if only for 5-10 sec
Now with spamc -c, only 2 int are returned. What about
returning the whole details, like:
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=14.4 required=5.0
tests=CLICK_BELOW,DATE_IN_FUTURE_06_12,EXCUSE_3,EXCUSE_FUTURE,
FROM_AND_TO_SAME_5,HTTP_USERNAME_USED,
INVALID_DATE_TZ_ABSUR
Hello,
I'd like to use spamc with mail users administred by vmailmgr:
only one unix user for a whole domain. Problem: I need separate
white/blacklists for each mail account: how could this
be solved ? Maybe using an sql backend and more parameters ?
Thanks for any hint :)
Olivier
--
I don't know if anyone every saw my post, but
please if anyone has any ideas, suggestions, please help.
I'm getting the following error in my QMail
logs:
deferral:
spamc_returned_temporary_failure
Sincerely,
Abel Jeffcoat
Rick Macdougall wrote on Tue, 7 Jan 2003 11:57:12 -0500:
> spamc has no such restriction. All that needs to be done is increase the
> size of the field in the MySQL database. We use it here with great success.
>
Thanks for both answers. So, this means, 1. MailCorral is the culprit handing
over
> FYI, works just fine. We've deployed it here using the full email as
> the key. We just made the field longer.
hmm, maybe I'll have to look into this. shouldn't be too hard to add
courier auth tool support to spamd so I wouldn't have to set up a
separate mysql database for this kind of thing.
Original Message-
> From: Rick Macdougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 10:57 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spamc and homedir
>
>
> Hi,
>
> spamc has no such restriction. All that needs to be done is
> increase
sday, January 07, 2003 10:32 AM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spamc and homedir
Justin Mason wrote on Mon, 06 Jan 2003 21:49:50 +:
> there are some patches now in the CVS version which do a lot of stuff with
> virtual users; might be worth taking a look.
>
I'm not too eager checking ou
Justin Mason wrote on Mon, 06 Jan 2003 21:49:50 +:
> there are some patches now in the CVS version which do a lot of stuff with
> virtual users; might be worth taking a look.
>
I'm not too eager checking out the CVS version :-)
I think I have a similar problem with SA as Chris encountered. SA
Chris,
there are some patches now in the CVS version which do a lot of stuff with
virtual users; might be worth taking a look.
--j.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
__
I've asked about this before, but could never get a straight answer, so
I figured I'd try again...
my problem:
I use courier and maildrop, and have virtual users. The virtual users
are all owned by the same user/group, which obviously has a different
homedir than the virtual users. I also have
On 2002-12-31 10:50:57 -0500, Dan Schwartz wrote:
> :0fw
:0fw: spamc.lock
> * < 10
> | spamc
Otherwise each mail will spawn a new instance of procmail and
spamc immediately. That means 100 instances if 100 mails arrive
at a time. Makes for a nice DOS. :-)
Best regards
Martin
--
Hi -
I setup SA 2.43 with sendmail 8.12.5/procmail 3.22 on redhat linux. I'm
fairly happy with the way things are working out, but occasionally see the
following error message in the procmail log file -
procmail: Program failure (74) of "spamc"
procmail: Rescue of unfiltered data succeed
> Now that works pretty fine, but if one of the users has exceeded his disk
> quota, then the SPAMc process and procmail hang indefinitely, pulling
> ressources like mad.
Correction / Update: The SPAMc & Procmail processes hang for 5 minutes and
then they die. However, the SPAMd process which als
Hi all,
I'm running SpamAssassin-2.41 on a couple of RedHat servers with Sendmail and
this is the basic setup:
SPAMd runs with this options:
/usr/bin/spamd -d -a -c -m 5
/etc/procmailrc has the following in it:
:0fw
/usr/bin/spamc -s 5 -u $1
Now that works pretty fine, but if one of the
Hello,
I have Spamassassin 2.43 running
on a FreeBSD 4.7-pl2
I had spamc/spamd working
flawlessly on the machine. However, I recently upgraded
to SA 2.43 and since then, spamassassin reports a
spam score of 0.0/$user-setting (where $usersetting is retrieved from an SQL databas
Based on the output I assume you must be running 2.50-cvs, since 2.43 would
not support multiple hosts in this manner.
And since this is new code in a CVS, not too surprising that it might have
a bug However, taking a casual look at the libspamc.c from the latest
CVS snapshot on
http://spa
At least, not as advertised
I have set up 2 spamd servers, and I have spamc being used from my
.procmailrc like so:
spamc -d spamd.alink.net -f
However... when I shut down the spamd on one, there are failures
connecting to both.. is this a known bug, or have I overlooked something
somewhere i
At least, not as advertised
I have set up 2 spamd servers, and I have spamc being used from my
.procmailrc like so:
spamc -d spamd.alink.net -f
However... when I shut down the spamd on one, there are failures
connecting to both.. is this a known bug, or have I overlooked something
somewhere i
Hi.
I use the spamassassin that folows SuSE 8.1, and have problems getting SA to
work.
I I manually enter the command spamc < spam.msg, it is working fine.
I use the Kmail.
erik@eurit:~/Documents> spamc < spam.msg
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 23 04:40:31 2002
Received: from mail.servermarket
> That's a *huge* difference. It shouldn't be my internet connection as it
> is pretty good.
>
> I have seen other posts mentioning really slow times. Any thoughts?
I have the same problem here. I updated from SA 2.31 to 2.43 recently and
installed Razor2 v2.20 in addition (2.31 was working wi
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 01:23:23PM -0800, Kaleb Pederson wrote:
> I have seen other posts mentioning really slow times. Any thoughts?
>
Network timeouts, ie your internet connection is flaky in some way.
---
Lars Hansson
---
This sf.net emai
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 30 Oct 2002, Kaleb Pederson wrote:
> However, if I use -a -c -L as a parameter I get:
>
> spamd[29034]: [info] setuid to kibab succeeded
> spamd[29034]: [processing message for kibab] 1000,
> expecting 4656 bytes.
> spamd[29034]: [identified
When I run:
$ time spamassassin -t < sample-spam.txt
I get:
real0m32.395s
user0m1.340s
sys 0m0.070s
When I use spamd/spamc I get the following in my log when I do:
$ spamc < sample-spam.txt
spamd[28922]: [info] setuid to kibab succeeded
spamd[28922]: [Created user preferences fil
Am wanting to create a procmail filter where spamassassin is allowed to
markup and deliver spam as it is wont to do by default, but additionally
would like to drop a totally unaltered copy in another mailbox.
Ever since I let spamassassin run away and consume all my swap space
when fetchmail was d
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 11:23:10AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This leads me to a question. Is there a way to tell SA to ignore (and
> possibly overwrite) all conflicting header lines like X-Spam-Status? That
It does already. SA removed the X-Spam-* headers before scanning.
This actually
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 09:47:52AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > So, why did I get SpamAssassin headers when I didn't have spamd running?
>
> The answer is that it's being scanned elsewhere. For instance, I
> receive mails (currently ~4% of my
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 09:47:52AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So, why did I get SpamAssassin headers when I didn't have spamd running?
The answer is that it's being scanned elsewhere. For instance, I
receive mails (currently ~4% of my mail per month) that already have a
X-Spam-Status head
So, why did I get SpamAssassin headers when I didn't have spamd running?
Patrick
Original Message
From: Theo Van Dinter
Date: Wed 10/16/02 9:38
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: [SAtalk] spamc && !
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 08:57:32AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> It's version 2.42 of SA. When I went back and checked, spamd was not running. So if
> it's spawning a spamd, it's not leaving it hanging around.
spamc does not spawn spamd. spamc tries to connect to the port, if
there's nothing
TECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] spamc && !spamd
What version are you running. I have had somthing like this cripple my
server as EVERY message caused a new spamd to startup (under 1.41) I have
not yet upgraded to 1.42 or even 1.43 i have just seen so i have not seen if
this goes away.
Robin
Hello,
I just installed SpamAssassin. I've told procmail to pipe messages through spamc, but
I was surprised when, before I had a chance to run spamd, messages appeared in my box
with SpamAssassin headers. Does spamc instantiate a spamd process if the daemon isn't
running?
Thanks,
Patrick
--
hi list,
spamassassin is very nice, but i wanna pass the required_hits value as
command line parameter to spamc, but didn't find anything about this in the
manual.
any solution? thx, soenke.
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
We
hrauder
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Spamc/spamd setup with Postfix
>
>
> I guess I forgot to say that it's on a mail-relay, which is
> supposed to scan the mail, and not deliver locally.
>
> So what I basically need, is the way to apply a contentfilte
er works on a mail-gateway.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Mike Schrauder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 7. oktober 2002 22:20
> To: Nicolai Strøm Gylling
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Spamc/spamd setup with Postfix
>
>
> I have it work
virus-scanner works on a mail-gateway.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Schrauder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 7. oktober 2002 22:20
To: Nicolai Strøm Gylling
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Spamc/spamd setup with Postfix
I have it working here, but I am not a linux person and ca
.mydomain.com[192.168.0.7], delay=5, status=sent (250 Message received:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@sw.mydomain.com)
Mike Schrauder
> -Original Message-
> From: Nicolai Strøm Gylling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 11:21 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Su
Hi
I want to setup a Postfix-server with Spamassassin, but so far I havn't had much luck,
by reading the docs, this mailinglist(including archives) and searching the net.
Could anyone provide a working example configuration of postfix and spamassassin
(using spamc/spamd), or link to a howto on
On Wed, Sep 18, 2002 at 12:44:14PM +0100, Ray Gardener wrote:
> I upgraded to 2.40 (now 2.41) last week and the messages which are definitely in the
>DCC database aren't being marked as such by spamassassin when connected to via spamc.
>Interestingly it is detected when running spamassassin -t <
Hi -
I upgraded to 2.40 (now 2.41) last week and
the messages which are definitely in the DCC database aren't being marked
as such by spamassassin when connected to via spamc. Interestingly it is
detected when running spamassassin -t < sample-spam.txt (using the same
userid incidentally).
On Tue, Jul 16, 2002 at 03:39:40PM -0700, Kevin Gagel wrote:
> corrupted. What I mean is that there is somehow an extra line feed being
> attached. How do I tell spamc to use spamassassin's -F 0 option?
"-F 0" won't remove a line feed, but the answer to your question is--
you don't. You tell spa
Never mind. I was trying to get spamc to accept the paramater when spamd needed
it instead. All is working well now.
Kevin Gagel wrote:
>
> I've got another problem here. (no surprise eh!)
> Now that I am relaying from my anti-virus scanner to the SpamAssassin scanner to
> my mail server, and it
I've got another problem here. (no surprise eh!)
Now that I am relaying from my anti-virus scanner to the SpamAssassin scanner to
my mail server, and it's working... I am getting a prolem with the headers being
corrupted. What I mean is that there is somehow an extra line feed being
attached. How
I am still trying to figure out why spam-assassin is not working the way
I expect it to on my system.
I am using sendmail with virtual hosting, procmail for local delivery,
and spamd/spamc. I run freeBSD. I have users with active shell accounts
and users with nonexistent shells and nonexistent
At 07/02/2002 21:24, Kenneth Porter wrote:
>In /etc/procmailrc I have:
>
>:0fw
>| /usr/bin/spamc -u spamd
>
>Before adding the -u to spamc, no processing appeared to happen, and log
>
>What's the right way to get per-user configs in this setup?
I believe you can fix this by addding
DROPPR
I'm running spamc/spamd on Red Hat 7.2 from the 2.20 RPM. (Just finished
building 2.31 and will update shortly.)
The spamd command line, taken from the initscript, looks like this:
spamd -d -c -a
In /etc/procmailrc I have:
:0fw
| /usr/bin/spamc -u spamd
Before adding the -u to spamc, no proce
Michael Leone ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> On Sat, 2002-06-29 at 19:24, Dan Allen wrote:
> > I can't figure this one out, but I have to soon or it is going to be
> > my rear in the hole. I switched over from junkfilter to
> > spamassassin and thought all was working, until I send myself a
> > me
On Sat, 2002-06-29 at 19:24, Dan Allen wrote:
> I can't figure this one out, but I have to soon or it is going to be
> my rear in the hole. I switched over from junkfilter to
> spamassassin and thought all was working, until I send myself a
> message from an external yahoo account I had. All loc
I can't figure this one out, but I have to soon or it is going to be
my rear in the hole. I switched over from junkfilter to
spamassassin and thought all was working, until I send myself a
message from an external yahoo account I had. All local messages
are getting tagged by spamc but anything t
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
