When I run: $ time spamassassin -t < sample-spam.txt
I get: <snip SA output> real 0m32.395s user 0m1.340s sys 0m0.070s When I use spamd/spamc I get the following in my log when I do: $ spamc < sample-spam.txt spamd[28922]: [info] setuid to kibab succeeded spamd[28922]: [Created user preferences file] /home/kibab/.spamassassin/user_prefs spamd[28922]: [processing message <N1msdrbJXNPfV4wg9> for kibab] 1000, expecting 4656 bytes. spamd[28922]: [identified spam (14.7/5.0) for kibab] 1000 in 30.7 seconds, 4656 bytes. So, spamd is indeed faster which is to be expected but both are taking _way_ to long. I'm currently using -a -c as a parameter. However, if I use -a -c -L as a parameter I get: spamd[29034]: [info] setuid to kibab succeeded spamd[29034]: [processing message <N1msdrbJXNPfV4wg9> for kibab] 1000, expecting 4656 bytes. spamd[29034]: [identified spam (14.7/5.0) for kibab] 1000 in 0.2 seconds, 4656 bytes. That's a *huge* difference. It shouldn't be my internet connection as it is pretty good. I have seen other posts mentioning really slow times. Any thoughts? --Kaleb ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future of Java(TM) technology. Join the Java Community Process(SM) (JCP(SM)) program now. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?sunm0004en _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
