On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 09:47:52AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > So, why did I get SpamAssassin headers when I didn't have spamd running? > > The answer is that it's being scanned elsewhere. For instance, I > receive mails (currently ~4% of my mail per month) that already have a > X-Spam-Status header in them before I touch them at all. > > spamc doesn't know how to markup the mail, let alone run the rules, > so there's no chance that it did the rewrite.
This leads me to a question. Is there a way to tell SA to ignore (and possibly overwrite) all conflicting header lines like X-Spam-Status? That way a spammer can't claim a low score or that the message isn't spam and get through my SA unchecked? This sort of thing would be doable in procmail but I'm personally running SA from MIMEDefang. Although, now that I think about it. SA when run from MD can't alter the message, only report on it. That means MD would have to strip those lines from the message before passing them to SA or SA would have to be configured to ignore those lines. Hmm, boogling... Justin ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: viaVerio will pay you up to $1,000 for every account that you consolidate with us. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;4749864;7604308;v? http://www.viaverio.com/consolidator/osdn.cfm _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
