Hi,
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 11:40:22 -0800 "Gary Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Greg Webster
> Sent: Tue 12/30/2003 11:31 AM
>
> Not 100% a spamassassin issue, but I've got a ton of spammers trying any
>
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003 11:31:29 -0800 Greg Webster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> Not 100% a spamassassin issue, but I've got a ton of spammers trying any
> address they possibly can on my domain. Postfix responds to each one
> with a 'reject: unknown user', but of course spammers don't
Not 100% a spamassassin issue, but I've got a ton of spammers trying
any
address they possibly can on my domain. Postfix responds to each one
with a 'reject: unknown user', but of course spammers don't use their
own address and my mail queue gets insanely full (not quite to the
point
of a denial-
Greg Webster
Sent: Tue 12/30/2003 11:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: [SAtalk] Postfix unknown user (peripherally related)
Hey folks,
Not 100% a spamassassin issue, but I've got a ton of spammers trying any
Hi Brian,
On the SpamAssassin.org site in the Documentation section is a HOWTO I
wrote to do this a couple different ways.
Greg
Good Morning, All,
I'm just getting my feet wet (still wet behind the ears, though) with
SpamAssassin and I am looking for specific info for setting it up to run
with
Hey folks,
Not 100% a spamassassin issue, but I've got a ton of spammers trying any
address they possibly can on my domain. Postfix responds to each one
with a 'reject: unknown user', but of course spammers don't use their
own address and my mail queue gets insanely full (not quite to the point
of
I've also found the following reference to be quite helpful. I didn't want to
parse outgoing mail, and this one is explicitely telling you how:
http://jessen.ch/articles/spamassassin-and-postfix/
On Tuesday December 30 2003 10:08, Atkins, Brian wrote:
> Good Morning, All,
>
> I'm just getting my
If you want to use postfix/amavisd-new/SA, I can recommend these docs:
http://www.geocities.com/scottlhenderson/spamfilter.html
and
http://lawmonkey.org/anti-spam.html
Casper.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
MZ to handle all mail in and out from our Exchange system.. works a charm.
regards,
Paul
> -Original Message-
> From: Atkins, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 30 December 2003 15:08
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: [SAtalk] Postfix and Spamassasin
>
sorry, forgot the url
http://advosys.ca/papers/postfix-filtering.html
> -Original Message-
> From: Atkins, Brian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2003 10:08 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: [SAtalk] Postfix and Spamassasin
>
>
8 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: [SAtalk] Postfix and Spamassasin
>
>
> Good Morning, All,
>
> I'm just getting my feet wet (still wet behind the ears, though) with
> SpamAssassin and I am looking for specific info for setting
> it
Good Morning, All,
I'm just getting my feet wet (still wet behind the ears, though) with
SpamAssassin and I am looking for specific info for setting it up to run
with Postfix. I have looked at
http://wiki.spamassassin.org/w/IntegratedInMta but I can't seem to locate
the amavisd.conf that it refer
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 02:11:39PM -0500, gentian wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I am thinking to use Postfix together with SpamAssassin and Amavisd. I guess
> maybe that is not the right list to ask this question but probably any of you
> has encountered this issue before.
>
> With postconf -e "mynetwo
* gentian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> With
> postconf -e "mynetworks=."
> i can setup which machines are allowed to relay mail to my server,
> but as I am opened to internet, I do not want to allow relaying based
> on the IP address of the sender but based on my domain name. So every
> email tha
Hi list,
I am thinking to use Postfix together with
SpamAssassin and Amavisd. I guess maybe that is not the right list to ask this
question but probably any of you has encountered this issue before.
With
postconf -e "mynetworks=."
i can setup which machines are allowed to relay
mai
Daniel Kaliel wrote:
Hey
At least once a week our server hangs. I can't figure this out. It seems
to be hanging when spamassassin is working on large emails. Here is how I
have it setup and where I am confused.
My confusion lies in this. If I use the mailbox_command field in postfix do
I need
Nevermind all, sorry for the post, I got it working.
Thanks,
Daniel
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything f
Hey
At least once a week our server hangs. I can't figure this out. It seems
to be hanging when spamassassin is working on large emails. Here is how I
have it setup and where I am confused.
My confusion lies in this. If I use the mailbox_command field in postfix do
I need all of below, or wil
Hi all,
I am using postfix-2.x + mysql + smtp-auth via pam_maysql + maildrop as
LDA and for extended quota support. All is working fine and all
configurations are virtuals (no shell acounts, only sql users), multiple
virtual domains, etc.
Can anyone suggest me a good howto about how to add to
- Original Message -
From: "Patrick T. Tsang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jason McCormick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: Postfix & Spamassassin - problem in mailling list?
> Dear Jason,
>
> Thanks for your help.
>
> In fact, I am doing exactly w
Mark Hepler wrote:
[...]
does anyone know of a website that has an example of setting up a
spamtrap like this with postfix ?
I don't know about postfix, but since you mention courier I'd suggest a
slightly different approach. If your users use IMAP it might be easier
to have them copy their mail
I have a mail server setup running: postfix, maildrop, courier anomy
sanitizer, spamassassin 2.6 (spamc/spamd)and I want to setup a spamtrap
account that users can forward spam that was not identified as such by
SA to for learning.
the spamassassin docs mention the use of an alias to pipe the
Hi
please forget my request. I solved it with whitelist_from.
thanks anyway.
Philipp
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag von
> mailinglists
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 2. Oktober 2003 14:42
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
I run a SpamAssassin 2.43 with Postfix 2.0.16. As it looks like spamd seems to check
its whitelist against the helo name of the remote server . Thus it happens that if the
helo name is not equal to the mail from:<> domain, SA marks the mail as spam. I had
to turn off Postfix' helo restricti
I have Spamassassin working with postfix. I have a few aliases setup and
notice that their mail is not checked by spamd. Does anyone know if this
can be done?
--
Thank You,
Jerry Carter
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welco
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex van den Bogaerdt
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 12:42:15AM -0400, Larry Gilson wrote:
> > Hi Alex,
>
> > > in master.cf:
> > >
> > > spamc unix- n n - -
> pipe
> > > flags=Fq
> > > user=spamcheck
On Thu, Sep 18, 2003 at 12:42:15AM -0400, Larry Gilson wrote:
> Hi Alex,
> > in master.cf:
> >
> > spamc unix- n n - - pipe
> > flags=Fq
> > user=spamcheck
> > argv=/usr/bin/spamc -x -e /usr/sbin/sendmail -i -f
> > $sender $reci
Hi Alex,
> -Original Message-
> From: Alex van den Bogaerdt
> I once tried to find out what the big need was to do it either way.
>
> May I present a third (or is it: a second?) alternative:
>
> in master.cf:
>
> spamc unix- n n - - pipe
>
Thanks to all who answered! Your perspectives are greatly appreciated!
Regards,
Larry
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 04:02:11PM -0400, Larry Gilson wrote:
> I have been trying to understand the advantages and disadvantages of using
> the shell script method (like that employed by SecuritySage) and the
> Procmail method as a content_filter for Postfix. Can someone lend an expert
> opinion
On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 04:02:11PM -0400, Larry Gilson wrote:
> I have been trying to understand the advantages and disadvantages of using
> the shell script method (like that employed by SecuritySage) and the
> Procmail method as a content_filter for Postfix. Can someone lend an expert
> opinion?
On Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:02:11 -0400
Larry Gilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have been trying to understand the advantages and disadvantages of
> using the shell script method (like that employed by SecuritySage) and
> the Procmail method as a content_filter for Postfix. Can someone lend
> a
I use a homemade filter chain based on the Perl Mail::Audit package.
The advantage is, if you know Perl, it's much easier to set up and maintain
than Procmail.
The disadvantage is, if you don't know Perl you probably can't use it. Oh
yeah, and running it means you have to deal with whatever overh
Hi All,
I have been trying to understand the advantages and disadvantages of using
the shell script method (like that employed by SecuritySage) and the
Procmail method as a content_filter for Postfix. Can someone lend an expert
opinion? Does anyone feel that one method is more flexible than anot
Nevermind. I found the answers at
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/#faq-spam
Thanks anyway.
On Tue, 26 Aug 2003 19:27:02 -0500, Mike Vanecek wrote
> I have got amavis debug running. I have postfix setup to only filter
> incoming
> (using a FILTER command in access_recipients). I have F-Prot
>
I have got amavis debug running. I have postfix setup to only filter incoming
(using a FILTER command in access_recipients). I have F-Prot installed.
Outgoing messages skip any scans.
Incoming messages only do virus scans, but no SA scans.
I am not sure that this is the problem, but when I star
> > Looks like your version of postfix is somehow or another failing to
> > understand classless reverse DNS. However, I can't see why it would
> > fail to do so since it should all by the OS's resolver library just
> > like "host" does.
It is not up to Postfix to understand reverse DNS. It is
On Fri, 22 Aug 2003 13:28:22 -0400, Matt Kettler wrote
> At 09:20 AM 8/22/2003 -0500, Mike Vanecek wrote:
> >have some rejects in my maillog. Was sourceforge having problems or ???
> >
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] admin]$ host 66.35.250.206
> >206.250.35.66.in-addr.arpa is an alias for 206.0/24.250.35.66.i
At 09:20 AM 8/22/2003 -0500, Mike Vanecek wrote:
have some rejects in my maillog. Was sourceforge having problems or ???
[EMAIL PROTECTED] admin]$ host 66.35.250.206
206.250.35.66.in-addr.arpa is an alias for 206.0/24.250.35.66.in-addr.arpa.
206.0/24.250.35.66.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer list
I have some rejects in my maillog. Was sourceforge having problems or ???
[EMAIL PROTECTED] admin]$ host 66.35.250.206
206.250.35.66.in-addr.arpa is an alias for 206.0/24.250.35.66.in-addr.arpa.
206.0/24.250.35.66.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer lists.sourceforge.net.
grep -i Aug 21 /var/log/ma
I don't do postfix or procmail, so I can't really help there, but you
definitely should *not* use SpamAssassin 2.44. It's outdated, and
you're sure to be disappointed with the results.
SpamAssassin is like a virus scanner: it needs to be kept updated to be
effective.
Mark Brosius wrote:
I ha
Here is my goal:
Internet -> SpamAssassin -> Exchange
I am trying to have spamassassin filter all email traffic and then pass
them, which will include something denoting that it is spam (perhaps put
SPAM in the subject), to the exchange server.
I have done the following and have had no luck:
Run
Hi Mark,
>-Original Message-
>From: Mark Brosius
>Here is my goal:
>
>Internet -> SpamAssassin -> Exchange
I use a similar setup.
>created /usr/bin/postfixfilter (owned by spamfilter
>permissions 755) which contains: ACCORDING TO GREG
>WEBSTER'S HOW TO
> #!/bin/bash
> /usr/b
Thank you for the quick response Larry.
I changed my /etc/procmail file to contain only what you suggested. I
then tried to send email to my local user and the email did not have the
spam header information. I'm guessing that the email is still not being
evaluated by spamc/spamd before it is bei
I recently installed Postfix 2 RBL checks. I have been watching my mail log
looking for a reject. I know the tests are working since spamcop was down for
a while and I got a warning message in my log.
I think I understand what is happening, but would appreciate a confirmation.
Postfix checks the c
Tony Earnshaw wrote:
The new TLS patch for Postfix 2.0.13 doesn't work properly yet, smtpd
and smtp have to talk to Amavisd unencrypted and encryption can't be
turned off at the moment to talk to Amavisd (bug), so the smtpd servers
should not advertise STARTTLS on an EHLO.
The above has now bee
Lucas Albers wrote:
So now their are three mail combinations that can block spam at the smtp
5xx rejection stage.
SA-Mimedefang-Sendmail
Postfix-2.xxx-CVS+AMavis
SA-Exim
Don't forget Tom Kistner's Exiscan for Exim 4, either. That can do virus
scanning too, like Amavisd-new (needs extra virus scan
> What's new about it, is that Postfix/amavisd-new - with this snapshot -
> can now do realtime smtp 5xx rejection of spam/virus (or save them to a
> quarantine directory, as before.) That lifts Postfix into SA-Exim 4's
> class as far as I'm concerned and I'm happy to be able to support it :-)
>
>
At 7/8/2003 06:23 PM +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
>The snapshot doesn't depend on Amavis for this. Any similar product with Amavis'
>properties could be used as proxy. But the normal Postfix/SA filter routine wouldn't
>have the same possibilities as Amavis. I can't comment on spampd (that's spamp
For anyone who cares, I spent a day testing the above Postfix snapshot
with amavisd-new and the Mail::SpamAssassin 2.60-CVS libraries. This is
an advanced Postfix setup, with full (MD5, GSSAPI, OTP etc)
SASL/LDAP-based SMTP AUTH and full TLS support.
What's new about it, is that Postfix/amavisd
> He has his own Consulting house, and occasionally send his lesser
> minions - Maurice, Xena and Yoda - to help, if he's busy.
Consulting? To the dark side it leads. Easy! Tempting!
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (Im Auftrag des Referat V a) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite Campus Mitte
Tony Earnshaw wrote:
Oleg Aronov wrote:
I have a problem ...
I have discussed this with Billy, my most intelligent cat and my IT
consultant (compare him to a mixture of Garfield and Catbert)
I have one of those - his name is Scudder. Not only is he a great
consultant, but he frequently grabs t
Tony Earnshaw wrote:
I have a problem and hope that somebody could help me.
We are running Postfix everything is fine except that some clients of
ours
cannot sent emails to us.
I have discussed this with Billy, my most intelligent cat and my IT
consultant (compare him to a mixture of Garfield
Oleg Aronov wrote:
I have a problem and hope that somebody could help me.
We are running Postfix everything is fine except that some clients of ours
cannot sent emails to us.
I have discussed this with Billy, my most intelligent cat and my IT
consultant (compare him to a mixture of Garfield and
Hi all,
I have a problem and hope that somebody could help me.
We are running Postfix everything is fine except that some clients of ours
cannot sent emails to us.
This is the information from var/log/maillog:
Jun 27 09:34:19 nico postfix/smtpd[12873]: reject: RCPT from
unknown[208.63.55.118]:
I'm using spamd with a mysql user preferences system
with postfix. Per user preferences are keyed by username,
so mail to username@ works fine (ie: spamd looks up the prefs for
said username). However we also give users email addresses
of the form firstname.lastname@ and even though the postfix al
Does anybody have a copy of the Postfix+SA howto that is mentioned on the
SA website and if so, can they email it to me? The link to Advosys.ca
doesn't work. It just times out.
If nobody has a copy of it, can anybody give me a little help getting SA to
work via the content_filter setting if p
This is actually a common question about Postfix. The answer is no, you
can't do anything within Postfix itself to make an inbound/outbound
distinction.
The best answer is apparently to run a separate postfix server on the
same box. The document on www.spamassassin.org about making Postfix work
On Fri, 2003-01-31 at 13:12, Ray Dzek wrote:
> I want to take the functionallity of the 3 boxes I have now (Inbound Postfix
> +SA, Sendmail Outbound Relay, and Postfix + POP3) and cut that all down to
> one box. The transport mappings and aliases required to get the Mac users
> onto the POP3 box
Christoph Bieselt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) had this to say on 11/18/02 at 05:47:
> Hi together,
>
> I am using Postfix with Procmail to call SA. As usual the procmail is
> called with the user defined in /etc/postfix/master.cf where the
> procmail transport is specified. SA is called by the user cyrus
Hi together,
I am using Postfix with Procmail to call SA. As usual the procmail is
called with the user defined in /etc/postfix/master.cf where the
procmail transport is specified. SA is called by the user cyrus which
delivers the mail to imap-boxes. Even SA is called/used, no X-Spam-Flag
oder any
For those running spamd on postfix, you might be interested in this perl
script that parses log files to generate stats and extract top spam
recipients :
http://www.gryzor.com/tools/
(Tested on postfix 1.1.11 and spamd 2.43)
Vincent
---
This sf
> "AS" == Apolinaras Sinkevicius writes:
AS> I am trying to figure out what would be the least time consuming and
AS> easiest way to integrate SA into postfix. Any ideas?
The most robust method IMHO, is to use amavisd-new:
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/
Full instructions are provided
On Mon, 11 Nov 2002, Apolinaras 'Apollo' Sinkevicius (Carmel Music & Entertainment,
LLC) wrote:
> I am trying to figure out what would be the least time consuming and
> easiest way to integrate SA into postfix. Any ideas?
Follow the instructions to run spamd and to call spamc via the
/etc/prom
--Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Apolinaras 'Apollo' Sinkevicius (Carmel Music & Entertainment, LLC)
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2002 2:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Postfix. How do I do quick set-up for SA? (NEWB
I am trying to figure out what would be the least time consuming and
easiest way to integrate SA into postfix. Any ideas?
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> "FA" == Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
FA> Do you happen to have any hints on stripping down functionality on
FA> amavisd to use _only_ SpamAssassin and no antivir stuff? I'm searching
FA> strictly for a method to interface Postfix and SpamAssassin that works
FA> well under high
* Florin Andrei ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote this on 09 26, 02 at 23:43:
> On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 06:42, Vivek Khera wrote:
> > > "FA" == Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > FA> (i'll describe my situation first, the questions are at the end)
> > FA> I managed to make SpamAssassin
On Thu, 2002-09-26 at 06:42, Vivek Khera wrote:
> > "FA" == Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> FA> (i'll describe my situation first, the questions are at the end)
> FA> I managed to make SpamAssassin talk to my Postfix MTA. Brief description
> FA> of the method:
> FA> 1. Get & ins
> "FA" == Florin Andrei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
FA> (i'll describe my situation first, the questions are at the end)
FA> I managed to make SpamAssassin talk to my Postfix MTA. Brief description
FA> of the method:
FA> 1. Get & install SpamAssassin (obvious)
FA> 2. Get spampd
[ ... ]
FA
Florin Andrei said:
> Has anyone compared spampd and spamproxyd in terms of speed and
> reliability under high load?
From what I hear, spampd is much better.
> What is the best solution for interfacing Postfix and SpamAssassin for
> servers under high load? (seems to me like spampd/spamproxyd
(i'll describe my situation first, the questions are at the end)
I managed to make SpamAssassin talk to my Postfix MTA. Brief description
of the method:
1. Get & install SpamAssassin (obvious)
2. Get spampd
http://www.worlddesign.com/index.cfm/rd/mta/spampd.htm
Install various Perl modules req
>Now my question. I am interested in having spamassassin use a "plus
> address" for things that it flags as spam. Can anyone tell me how I
> could have spamassassin change the "to" address say from
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for messages marked as
> spam?
I think you could d
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Halligan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 23 September 2002 21:02
> To: Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
> Subject: [SAtalk] Postfix as an MTA with SA -- forwarding spam
>
>
> I am running Postfix as a gateway MTA (no local deli
Hello,
First, I want to thank everyone involved for spamassassin. So far I
have been impressed.
I have a postfix setup that works with cyrus, lmtp, virus filtering with
AVP, and the sql settings with spamassassin. If anyone needs help with
this, I will be glad to give any info I can.
I am running Postfix as a gateway MTA (no local delivery) and am using SA to
mark spam as it passes through.
I am familar with postfixes ability to reject mail based on header content,
so I know I could look for "X-SPAM: Yes" and reject. But I don't want to
outright reject it. I would rather for
Hi, all.
Just thought I would interject something about my work as published as
part of the SA sources, being a fellow Postfix user (or should that be
"junkie"? *pats a vein in his forearm* :) ).
I would imagine that a lot of the "pipe" methods that are used with
various other MTAs, such as Exi
Fresh DailyT
- Original Message -
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "David B. Bitton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2002 11:34 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Postfix + Procmail + Spam Assassin + Cyrus
>
> what do you mean by 'u
PROTECTED]>
> To: "David B. Bitton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, June 15, 2002 11:22 PM
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Postfix + Procmail + Spam Assassin + Cyrus
>
>
> >
> > get rid of the procmail link, plug in spa
get rid of the procmail link, plug in spamcheck.py as the lmtp connection
for postfix, and have spamcheck.py then dump to cyrus' lmtp server for
filtering (sieve) and delivery ...
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, David B. Bitton wrote:
> Looks like I found the problem w/ Cyrus reporting invalid header. I
Looks like I found the problem w/ Cyrus reporting invalid header. I ran a
piece of testmail through Spam Assassin and noticed:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jun 15 22:39:08 2002
and this is not RFC 822 compliant, and therefore Cyrus rejects it. If you
add:
:0 fwh
| formail -I "From "
before yo
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Jeremy Fowler
> Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 12:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Postfix spamproxyd
>
>
> I'm trying to get Spamproxyd started so I can use Postfix's content
> filter with
> Spamproxyd.
>
I'm trying to get Spamproxyd started so I can use Postfix's content filter with
Spamproxyd.
However, my initd script for spamproxyd isn't working. It's calling spamproxyd
as such:
su spam -c "cd && /usr/bin/spamproxyd localhost:10125 localhost:10126
[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
However, it's coming back
On 23/05/02 at 17:56, John Weissberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
> Can anyone point me to a clear and simply explanation of how
> to set-up SA with Postfix using either spamd or spamproxy?
>
> I tried 4 or 5 months ago back when bleeding edge was V2.0 and
> was unsuccessful then. Perhaps someone
John,
I am setting up the same thing at the moment actually. I haven't fully
released it to our customer base, but I am testing it and it is working
fine. Any comments from others would be great though.
I've installed Procmail v3.22 and SpamAssassin 2.20. I am running spamd
with the flags -d (da
> "JW" == John Weissberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JW> Can anyone point me to a clear and simply explanation of how to set-up
JW> SA with Postfix using either spamd or spamproxy?
spamproxyd can lose your mail, so don't use it.
what I'm using is amavisd-new without any antivirus checker.
b
Can anyone point me to a clear and simply explanation of how to set-up
SA with Postfix using either spamd or spamproxy?
I tried 4 or 5 months ago back when bleeding edge was V2.0 and was
unsuccessful then. Perhaps someone has developed a good solution now.
--
John Weissberg
PerfectProof
www.per
How are ppl doing this?
For instance, if you use postfix+content_filter being spamproxyd, the
message is passed to spamproxyd, but it doesn't have any knowledge of the
recipients themselves ... does it? If it doesn't, then how are ppl making
use of the per-user preferences?
_
On Sat, 11 May 2002, Daniel Pittman wrote:
> On Fri, 10 May 2002, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 May 2002, Craig R Hughes wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> using the Bcc field instead of To or CC then you'll want to manually
> >> adjust the score the GA assigns. But you might also want to
> >> re-eval
On Fri, 10 May 2002, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Fri, 10 May 2002, Craig R Hughes wrote:
[...]
>> using the Bcc field instead of To or CC then you'll want to manually
>> adjust the score the GA assigns. But you might also want to
>> re-evaluate your email practices -- do you *really* need those
>>
On Fri, 10 May 2002, Craig R Hughes wrote:
> If you are a person who regularly sends all your correspondence
That would be "... regularly *receives* ...", wouldn't it? Which is not
something over which I necessarily have all that much control ... if I
did, I wouldn't need SA :-).
> using the B
Bart Schaefer wrote:
BS> What, so now all Bcc's are spam?
Nope, just a sign of spam. That's the beauty of weighted scoring.
BS> I don't think the GA can possibly give a valid score to such a rule. How
BS> can you have any confidence that there's a representative number of Bcc'd
BS> messages i
Postfix now supports adding a Delivered-To to singly-delivered messages
just by turning on a flag. (and being sure to set messages to be
singly-delivered, also just a config item in postfix).
I'm currently doing a "Does the envelope recipient match the To: address"
test via other means, and find
ara [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 00:41
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] postfix and spam assassin
Hi guys,
I'm new on the list.
I heard lot of good things about spam assassin.
My postfix is configured as a relay server. Can I use spamassasin for
the
ch
Hi guys,
I'm new on the list.
I heard lot of good things about spam assassin.
My postfix is configured as a relay server. Can I use spamassasin for the
checking
of incoming mail before it's relayed?
Thanks.
neil camara ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - cc{na|sa}, mcse - pgp 0x77B2
network/security eng
Has anyone worked on modifing mailstats so it will graph the amount of
spam identified.
TIA
P.S. Or any scriptable way to be able to show a trend in postfix on
the amount of mail recieved that is spam.
--
--
Ron Ross
On Sat, 2002-03-09 at 10:38, Donald Greer wrote:
>Keith,
>Look through the archives. Somebody posted an answer to this before.
> Basically, what they did, was follow the "simple" configuration
> described in the README.filter and in the shell script they used
> "spamc". I don't know
Keith,
Look through the archives. Somebody posted an answer to this before.
Basically, what they did, was follow the "simple" configuration
described in the README.filter and in the shell script they used
"spamc". I don't know that anyone has used spamproxyd, but the trick is
that yo
Anyone have spamassassin working with postfix with the mysql patch
making everyone a virtual user?
I'd like to run everything through spamproxyd, the directions appear
simple enough. However mail just loops constantly in every configuation
I've tried. Postfix -> spamproxyd -> postfix -> spamprox
MAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: Greg Blakely; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]';
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Postfix and SpamAssassin 2.01 -
spamproxyd/Mail::Audit problems
Craig Hughes wrote:
> Actually, we dropped Mail::Audit since it doesn&#x
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
