[THIS LIST HAS MOVED! see http://useast.spamassassin.org/lists.html .]
On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Tim B wrote:
> Jennifer Wheeler wrote:
> > Hello spam peeps
> >
> > Adam Lopresto and I have recently begun working together on Chickenpox,
> > and while working on that set
these are all mails that get learned about 30 days after being stored on
the system. Basically people have 30 days to clean up their mail.. if
not a FP, then we learn it as spam. So all learned mail is about 30
days old to the tee..
do i need to change my method of learning?
thanks
adam
On
hmm that is wierd b/c i learned about 500 a nite or so for the last 3 to
4 weeks...
sigh.. does this mean corruption in the DB ?
adam
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 13:21, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 12:27:53PM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> > debug: bayes: expiry check
ng db_toks
debug: bayes: 4047 untie-ing db_seen
debug: bayes: files locked, now unlocking lock
unlock: 4047 unlink failed: /share/spam/bayes.lock
debug: unlock: 4047 unlink /share/spam/bayes.lock
any more insight as to the problem based on this new 2.63 output?
thanks
adam
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 1
Thanks Theo i will try that. Any idea why these tokens wont expire
though? I learn a lot of spam each day and still nothing and my DB just
keeps getting bigger and bigger.
adam
On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 23:33, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 09:55:06AM -0500, Adam Denenberg wr
t any more tokens, it should be able to expire by now. I also tried
taking bayes_toks and feeding it thru db_dump -r | db_load to try and
fix any messed up entries but no dice.
any advice on how to force an expire successfully here?
I am running 2.60 on solaris 9.
thanks
is this list working today?
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
lse to refer to this file?
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 2004-01-26 at 13:46, Adam D. Lopresto wrote:
> > Actually, we can do better than that. Check out Jennifer's Backhair set.
> >
> > http://www.emtinc.net/spamhammers.htm
> >
> > It'll find invalid HTML
;
> ---
> The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
> Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
> See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
> http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
> ___
Open Tools Development and Integration
> See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
> http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamas
I'm having the same issue. I have the same setup as Scott, as well
(sendmail -> md -> spamassassin) all logging to /var/log/maillog, and
sa-stats always reports well, nothing :)
-adam
on 1/22/2004 10:04 AM Vermyndax said the following:
Hi Bob...
Thanks for the suggestions. I dow
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>
--
Adam Lopresto
http://cec.wustl.edu/~adam/
Coffee: Good to the last drop, and I intend to be the last to dro
> Aren't there newsgroups that person can go to to find people ... ahem ...
> intimately familiar with goats?
Nothing to say, just the tagline.
--
Adam Lopresto
http://cec.wustl.edu/~adam/
"The Web brings people together because no matter what kind of a twisted sexual
mutant
_
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>
--
Adam Lopresto
http://cec.wustl.edu/~adam/
And entropy continued to increase.
---
The SF.Net email
Software Configuration Management System offering
> advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
> Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTE
anges on 50+ platforms.
> Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>
--
Adam Lopresto
http://cec.wus
; their definition of not-spam.
>
>
> Copyright, not Trademark. Big Difference.
Actually, it's both; it's a copyrighted poem, but it also contains their
trademark in such a way that if you use it without a license, they can sue you
both ways.
--
Adam Lopresto
http://cec.wustl.edu
e/loadprog.html
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>
--
Adam Lopresto
http://cec.wustl.edu/~adam/
Peace and long life, unless the two be mutually ex
ail is sponsored by: Perforce Software.
> Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering
> advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
> Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
> _____
n a
> > recent spam:
> >
> http://www.google.com/url?q=http://cardtraffic.com
>
> Proposed rule:
>
> uri L_URI_REDIR3/http:\/\/www\.google\.com\/url?q=http:/i
> describe L_URI_REDIR3 open URI redirector #3
> score L_URI_REDIR3 1.5
>
> Dave
>
>
Adam Hirsch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> One of the two, every so often, has the annoying habit of one of its spamds
> suddenly deciding to balloon into every available byte of memory, bringing
> the machine to its knees. The other machine does not. Each time it
> happens,
e::AUTOLOAD" at
>> /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.6.1/sun4-solaris/DB_File.pm line 234.
I can't explain why one machine is seeing this and the other isn't -- I'm
looking for any configuration differences between the two, and I'm
suspecting that it's going to turn out to be
oftware Configuration Management System offering
> advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms.
> Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
data: last journal
sync atime
0.000 0 1073456071 0 non-token data: last expiry
atime
0.000 01382400 0 non-token data: last expire
atime delta
0.000 0 1019 0 non-token data: last expire
reduction count
thanks
adam
On 12/31/03, Jonas Eckerman wrote:
>
>On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 14:04:45 -0600, Adam Schneider wrote:
>
>> DUBIOUS WORD BEGINNINGS:
>
>One problem with this is of course acronyms and names (lots of english writing people
>have non english names, and names of products (es
r($_,0,2)} = 1;
}
}
print "DUBIOUS WORD BEGINNINGS:\n";
foreach my $a ('a'..'z') {
foreach my $b ('a'..'z') { if (!$found{$a.$b}) { print "$a$b "; } }
print "\n";
}
print "\n";
Adam Schneider
http
or "bs". Looking for word
beginnings might be more useful than looking within words. I bet that with a few
minutes fiddling with perl and a dictionary file, I could generate a list of
"forbidden" word-initial letter p
header spec must apparently come after the report_safe
>setting...
That seemed to do the trick, but it does beg the question: if you can set the format
of the spam report in the "add_header_ directive, what are "clear_report_template" and
"report&
ld_headers1
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Adam
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's
Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash she
, etc.)
do indeed take effect, however.
These are my other options in user_prefs:
report_safe 0
use_terse_report0
always_add_headers 1
always_add_report 0
fold_headers1
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Adam
---
This SF.net ema
Sorry for the off-topic post but just wanted to wish all the SA
developers and crew a happy and safe holiday.
Thanks for all the hard work you people put into this software!
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
sorry i missed this in 20_dnsbl_tests.cf
header RCVD_IN_NJABL_DIALUP eval:check_rbl('njabl-notfirsthop',
'dnsbl.njabl.org.', '127.0.0.3')
describe RCVD_IN_NJABL_DIALUP NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP
tflags RCVD_IN_NJABL_DIALUP net
On Tue, 2003-
ing something
adam
On Tue, 2003-12-23 at 13:40, Bill Landry wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mike Grau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Can someone tell me if, using SA 2.61, the
> > NJABL test for dialup "dnsbl.njabl.org" is correct
> > o
supplement to help SA be even better at
what it already does so well.
adam
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 09:46, Fred wrote:
> Adam Denenberg wrote:
> > SA List,
> >
> > What i want to start is a Bayes Corpus Project. I would like to be
> > able to allow people to submit confirmed
cant control and try to "beat" SA on their own, so if we all had a very
large accurate spam corpus we would be in a serious advantage point. I
think the benefit of Bayes speaks for itself based on the posts on this
list (and personal use).
Feedback and ideas welcome and appreciated.
t
in the same directory as the bayes DB files.
adam
- Original Message -
From: "AthlonRob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 10:17 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] sa-learn ..
0.9 RAZOR2_CHECK Listed in Razor2 (http://razor.sf.net/
> <http://razor.sf.net/> )
>
>
>
>
>
> I prefer using the spamc client. Any ideas??
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Mark Norton
>
>
>
>
--
Out of curiosity, is there a reason why SpamAssassin omits a configuration
option for razor_add_header when dcc_add_header and pyzor_add_header exist?
Thanks in advance.
--
Adam J. Foxson
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux
ng for an obfuscated version of /\basdf/ I wouldn't
expect [EMAIL PROTECTED] to match. I think the key is that when you turn a word
character into a nonword character, any \b next to it should change to \B, so
that " @sdf" would match, but "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wouldn't.
S_CGI_NOT_BUGGY X-Mailer =~ /^NMS FormMail\.pl.*v\d/
Change to:
header __NMS_CGI_NOT_BUGGY X-Mailer =~ /^NMS FormMail.*/
Regards
Adam
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert in LINUX or just shar
ok that clears it up, sorry for the confusion. I misinterpreted your
explanation. I am clear on how this operates now.
thanks
adam
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 14:37, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 02:18 PM 12/4/2003, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> >i thought bayes knew if a message was whitelisted or bl
every blacklisted
gets learned as spam, which is a very bad thing.
Am i confused?
adam
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 13:56, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 12:53 PM 12/4/2003, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> >cant you just whitelist the sa-talk mailing lists since i believe Bayes
> >does not learn
cant you just whitelist the sa-talk mailing lists since i believe Bayes
does not learn from whitelists, correct?
adam
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 11:21, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 11:06 AM 12/4/2003, Smart,Dan wrote:
> >In reading the sa-learn man file, it says running discussions of spam
>
check your network tests and see if one of them is failing. Running
spamd -D should tell you if an RBL timed out or not. The default RBL
timeout is 15 seconds i believe so that could be a culprit.
adam
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 09:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We just set up a new mail ser
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 14:25, Chris Thielen wrote:
> Did somebody mention editor wars? C'mon let's hear from you Emacs people ;)
emacs rocks
alt-% for search/replace or
ctrl-alt-% for regex search/replace
--
Adam Lanier
Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
212.230.2491
how agressive are these rules? I am hearing great things about them but
dont want to produce FP's on my production system.
Any feedback?
thanks
adam
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 11:42, Chris Santerre wrote:
> latest is 1.52. Fixed 2 typos and 3 domains. An SF
> project.
Yes i have "allow_user_rules" set to 1 in the local.cf. It doesnt seem to
help though, i still need to define the entire rule however in the local.cf
file. I define the rule in the DB as follows:
mysql> select * from userpref where username='[EMAIL PROTECTED]' and
get analyzed.
anyone have similar issues?
thanks
adam
On Nov 26, 2003, at 3:31 PM, Terry Milnes wrote:
What do you mean by "user rules"? if you mean user preferences I
have preferences in mysql that are not in the local.cf and they do
work.
Terry
Adam Denenberg wrote:
I beli
when i had defined all 3 (header, describe, score) in
local.cf and then simply overrode the score preference in mysql.
Can anybody offer assistance as to how to fix this so that actual rules
can be placed in mysql?
thanks
adam
---
This
Hello,
I am getting the following errors when running an "sa-learn -D
--rebuild" on a 2.6 installation on solaris 2.9. not sure what the
errors means, but i cant seem to expire my tokens. Any ideas?
thanks
adam
synced Bayes databases from journal in 1 seconds: 795 unique entries
(
so basically if i do report_safe > 0, and the message is text/plain and
found to be spam, there is no way of keeping the message in tact without
attachment?
adam
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 10:38, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 09:17:46AM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> >
_report if the type is not text/plain.
Is there a way to use report_safe 2 simply to "defang mime" spam
emails and not attach them all? I thought this was something that could
be controlled but i cant seem to get it to do so.
thanks
adam
99.6)
by nymx1.domain.com with SMTP; 26 Nov 2003 14:18:50 -
Received: (qmail 9062 invoked by uid 0); 26 Nov 2003 14:19:07 -
Date: 26 Nov 2003 14:19:07 -
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: test
test
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at
3fc3fefc12e0dce4 debug: Score 0 for rule
RCVD_IN_DSBL <-- SHOULD BE 10 @40003fc3fefc12e2adbc
debug: Score 0 for rule RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET@40003fc3fefc12e46b0c
debug: Score 0 for rule RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK
thanks
adam
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 09:47, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 09:06:28AM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> > shouldnt the original from be preserved up top?
>
> If there was a from in the original, it should be in the encapsulated
> message. Feel free to open a bu
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 09:47, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 09:06:28AM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> > shouldnt the original from be preserved up top?
>
> If there was a from in the original, it should be in the encapsulated
> message. Feel free to open a bu
d to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
shouldnt the original from be preserved up top?
adam
On Nov 24, 2003, at 11:18 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003
well i would think it at least preserves the From field no? The from
field seems to be getting whacked whenever there is a spam message with
report_safe 2
am i missing something?
On Nov 24, 2003, at 11:06 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 10:19:31PM -0500, Adam Denenberg
hey
dont appear in the message header.
any ideas?
thanks
adam
On Nov 24, 2003, at 9:48 PM, Adam Denenberg wrote:
Hey,
I have 2.55 and 2.60 running. I would like to use report_safe 2, to
attach any "mime dangerous" spam messages. This seems to work in
2.55, however in 2.6, every
re has detected".
Shouldnt report_safe 2 only be "defanging" dangerous spam messages and
not them all?
thanks
adam
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does
score RCVD_IN_MAPS_NML 0
score RCVD_IN_MAPS_RBL 0
score RCVD_IN_MAPS_DUL 0
score RCVD_IN_MAPS_RSS 0
thanks
adam
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
help you create b
: bayes: First pass? Current:
1069606209, Last: 1069545211, atime: 0, count: 0, newdelta: 0, ratio: 0
@40003fc0e54b137d95fc debug: bayes: something fishy, calculating
atime (first pass)
@40003fc0e5793a3f9924 Out of memory!
thanks
adam
On Mon, 2003-11-24 at 15:25, Justin Mason wrote
ccess rate (or better idea) for high volume
nfs locking using bayes and the "learn to journal" option?
thanks
adam
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Doe
no one has
pursued it in the first place.
On Sun, 23 Nov 2003, Robert Menschel wrote:
> Hello Adam,
>
> Thursday, November 20, 2003, 2:13:24 PM, you wrote:
>
> ADL> Recently I got sick of seeing the queue on my SpamAssassin gateway full of
> ADL> double bounces that will
thing like this? Is it a good
idea, or am I just waiting for something to bite me? Any scripts or experience
appreciated, since my mime handling isn't top notch.
--
Adam Lopresto
http://cec.wustl.edu/~adam/
perl -le '$_=(split q,",,`$^Xdoc -
Hello,
I am trying to confirm that RBLs are working. I have the following in
my local.cf but with debug output on (output below) nothing about RBLs
are noted. How do i confirm the RBLs i want are working properly?
thanks
adam
from local.cf
-
### RBL Checks
skip_rbl_checks 0
sin/UnixLocker.pm
line 69.
Use of uninitialized value in subtraction (-) at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/UnixLocker.pm
line 78.
any ideas?
thanks
adam
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
D
W/Q4_2003/t/g22lp?Target=mm/g22lp.tmpl
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>
--
Adam Lopresto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Unix System Administrator
Center f
ed to use supervised training if I wish to get the best spam
detection from spamassassin.
Can anyone recommend a minimum hassle way for supervised training? I can use
both IMAP an POP boxes for my account.
Thanks
Adam
"Matt Kettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMA
, but was wondering if this limitation still existed.
Any feedback on results or issues would be appreciated.
thanks
adam
---
This SF. Net email is sponsored by: GoToMyPC
GoToMyPC is the fast, easy and secure way to access your computer from
r any
mistakes, and correct them.
Your comments would be grately appreciated.
Regards Adam
#.procmailrc
##
:0fw: spamassassin.lock
| spamassassin
:0c:
* ^X-Spam-Status: No
| sa-learn --ham
:0c:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
| sa-learn -
Is there a practical limit on the number of entries you can put in a
white/black list?
At what point does the number of entries begin to affect performance?
--
Adam Lanier
Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC
212.230.2491
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
a contribution, and help us add new
> features and functionality. Click here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>
--
Ada
rough the set of links at the top-right of
the home page.
Checked the mirrors for good measure, and I can see it on all of them, as
well.
hth
Adam
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations
Here's your chance to sh
Thiago,
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2553
adam
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 11:22, Thiago Lima wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm seeing to many messages marked as spam and there're not.
> Looking further I found that all messages came from users usi
try using GNU Patch instead of the one with solaris, i get this all the
time. It will fix your problems.
adam
On Wednesday, October 8, 2003, at 06:47 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Under Solaris 8, applying the Razor2.patch to fix the taint problem
Dies
horribly:
I cd to: /usr/local/lib
anybody sharing bayes over NFS, with any issues? I thought i read
somewhere that somebody was sharing bayes over NFS with a netapp filer
with no probs.
anybody want to put in their $.02 to bayes over NFS.
I am running 2.6 FYI.
thanks
adam
under X-Spam-Level: i only see 6 stars, which means the number was
probably 6.99 something, and got rounded to 7 in the email, but didnt
actually hit the required 7.0
adam
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 09:01, Jeffrey Wheat wrote:
> I am seeing problems with 2.60 on a FreeBSD
> server, using exim
kind of a repost of my previous question. But i dont see any use of
check_for_sender_no_reverse that shows up in EvalTest.pm. Can i use
this and apply my own score to it? Why is there no score associated
with this test?
thanks
adam
Does anybody have any comments or feedback on using SA with perl 5.8 on
solaris 9 running 64 bit? Or maybe 2.8 running perl 64 bit?
Just seeing if anybody has any issues running perl in 64 bit mode on
solaris.
thanks
adam
---
This
i posted this earlier but it didnt show up in the list, wierd..
A repost of my previous question. But i dont see any use of
check_for_sender_no_reverse that shows up in EvalTest.pm. Can i use
this and apply my own score to it? Why is there no score associated
with this test?
thanks
adam
is actually used.
what i would like to do is actually use the reverse DNS feature of the
smtp server trying to deliver mail.
ANybody know how to use this feature, and put it into a rule?
thanks
adam
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkG
it, and then relearn.. is
there a good way to do this? Anyone have a way to handle it?
thanks!
-adam
At 07:47 PM 9/30/2003, Mike Carlson wrote:
How are people handling email that has to be learned. My spamassassin box is
a relay that forwards all the email to my exchange server. Since I am using
Ou
I believe that's
where db.h comes from. I know db.h doesn't come with DB_File, so don't go
looking for it there.
Adam Stein
--
Adam Stein @ Xerox Corporation Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
D
is might not be
possible, given how headers can change when re-forwarded, but I just
wanted to doublecheck.
Thanks in advance for any of your insight :)
Regards,
Adam
http://www.smilezone.com/ -- Everything to make you smile :)
http://www.bladam.com/ -- Life, Liberty, Love, and Stuff
---
IP returned by the wildcard DNS record, and has an httpd
which simply redirects to sitefinder.verislime.com
The idea is to block the redirect, not to block sitefinder per se.
Adam
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome t
was the trough of the wave).
Adam
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTE
dead as a doornail for quite some time.
The Verisign hackery has had the unfortunate effect of making
dorkslayers.com resolve again.
Adam
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkge
p squib.
Our mail server has been hit by over 1000 copies of Sobig.F within the
last few hours - every single one of them from a machine with its date
set to today.
Adam
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
ht
(Includes 2.59pre2.60pre3-1)
deb http://people.debian.org/~nobse/debian/woody/backported ./
(Includes 2.55-2)
Adam
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
___
ase stop using relays.osirusoft.com"
hence the apparent listing of all IPs.
To be honest, I'm amazed it's taken this long for Joe to finally do
something to stop people using his zones. It's been coming for a while.
Adam
> assume)
It's rather more than since Friday. The DOS against Osirusoft has been
ongoing for at least the last month or so.
Adam
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http:/
27;s implementation of
ECMAScript is a bit of bandwagon-jumping by NS a number of years ago.
If you want to block Java, you need to be looking for .java, .jar,
.class, etc.
Adam
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites inc
i am sure of the
effect. Does keeping more reduce the validity of bayes by much? My
bayes db never goes over 33 Mb and i am concerend that i expire too
frequently.
thanks
adam
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 21:54, Matt Kettler wrote:
> Do you have a specific kind of help you need, or should we assume it's an
> accidental PEBAC?
PEBKAC (or PEBCAK), surely? :-)
The problem needs to exist between the chair and something el
Is there a way to specify which RBL SA should check? I dont want to
just turn the score to 0 for an RBL check, i want to save the time used
to even check certain RBLS. I only want to call 3 specific ones, is this
possible?
thanks
adam
ok sorry, tokens. Is there a theory on how many tokens one should
keep? I have space and capacity for a large number of tokens, but dont
want to counter the effect bayes has by keeping too many tokens. Any
theory or rule of thumb to this?
thanks
adam
On Thu, 2003-08-07 at 17:09, Theo Van
in the fact that you may not be calling
spamc with -u option so spamc doesnt use the prefs of that user, which
defaults to vpopmail (the calling user).
hope it helps
adam
On Saturday, August 2, 2003, at 10:49 AM, Scott Davis wrote:
Folks,
My apologies if someone has already dealt with
) just as long as it was able to retreive them. Why does the
finish_parsing() affect sql and not flat file user configs only ?
adam
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 09:11, Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sen
however get "Checking priveleged commands in user config".
does this mean i can not use the user rules in my sql config? What is
preventing me from doing so?
I run spamd as /usr/bin/spamd -a -d -x -q -u nobody
any ideas?
thanks
adam
On Monday, July 28, 2003, at 07:50 PM, Adam Denenb
1 - 100 of 144 matches
Mail list logo
