cant you just whitelist the sa-talk mailing lists since i believe Bayes does not learn from whitelists, correct?
adam On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 11:21, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 11:06 AM 12/4/2003, Smart,Dan wrote: > >In reading the sa-learn man file, it says running discussions of spam > >through sa-learn is bad. Does SA take this into account already, or should > >I create a procmail rule to bypass SA for messages from SATalk and > >(possibly) Postfix-List ? > > SA's bayesian system does not take into account where email comes from. > > So, you might want to consider creating a procmail bypass if you're > concerned about poison. > > That said, I do run sa-talk through spamassassin here, and haven't had too > much trouble, however my autolearn thresholds are set a bit wider apart > than most. > > I do avoid sa-talk, razor-users, sa-dev, etc when setting up my training > however. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. > Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's > Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. > Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
