i thought bayes knew if a message was whitelisted or blacklisted and used that knowledge to prevent impartial bayes learning? Am i wrong in thinking this was ever the case?
If bayes doesnt use whitelisting/blacklisting to determine auto_learn, then every whitelisted mail gets learned as ham and every blacklisted gets learned as spam, which is a very bad thing. Am i confused? adam On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 13:56, Matt Kettler wrote: > At 12:53 PM 12/4/2003, Adam Denenberg wrote: > >cant you just whitelist the sa-talk mailing lists since i believe Bayes > >does not learn from whitelists, correct? > > No, bayes does not use the score contributions of whitelisting in > determining wether or not to auto-learn, but it can still autolearn if the > non-whitelisted score is over/under a threshold. > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. > Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's > Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. > Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
