I am used Exim 2.55 with Exim and exiscan-acl but I have noticed that
spam messages are not being tagged. My local.cf is:
required_hits 10.0
rewrite_subject 1
spam_level_char *
spam_level_stars 1
skip_rbl_checks 1
dns_available no
check_mx_attempts 0
check_mx_delay 5
report_safe 0
use_terse_report
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002, Theo Van Dinter outgrape:
> [1 ]
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 06:34:46PM +0100, Sean Rima wrote:
>> Oct 7 18:31:13 bsod spamd[8690]: Attempt to free non-existent
>> shared string during global destruction.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi folks,
Seeing the following in my log:
Oct 7 18:31:13 bsod spamd[8690]: Attempt to free non-existent shared
string during global destruction.
Wondering what this is. Using the current release.
Sean
- --
Sean Rima
that up on perl so this loses me.
Sean
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF MY WIFE.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Derrick Hudson told this:
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 11:37:02PM +0100, Sean Rima wrote:
>
>| One thing that I have noticed of late with korean spam is that the
>| editor seems to be "Namo WebEditor v5.0"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
One thing that I have noticed of late with korean spam is that the
editor seems to be "Namo WebEditor v5.0". Whilst the software itself
seems to be reputable, I hazard a guess that it is mot really mean't for
email
Sean
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Theo Van Dinter verbalised:
> On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 08:24:19PM +0100, Sean Rima wrote:
>> I cannot remember howto disable RAZOR in SA. Someone pls hit me hard
>> with the answer :)
>
> score RAZOR_CH
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I cannot remember howto disable RAZOR in SA. Someone pls hit me hard
with the answer :)
Sean
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Craig R. Hughes spake thusly:
> Sean Rima wrote:
>
> SR> Actually RAM has always been a problem for me because it is not
> SR> that cheapo here, it pees me off when people say that they can get
> SR>
be speaking with a contact in the UK next
month, he is good at finding me bits cheaply so I may get him to get me
some strips.
Sean
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE
eans and Taiwanese
> with their horrendous price competition in RAM production have
> eliminated the "I don't have enough RAM" excuse.
>
Actually RAM has always been a problem for me because it is not that
cheapo here, it pees me off when people say that they can get a stri
st factor that I have, I cannot justify the cost of a
new PC when I am not working and semi retired due to ill health. I was
considering putting SA on a 486 with 24mb of ram, have nothing else
running on the box so the box is given over to SA.
Sean
- --
Sean Rimahtt
n that system no mail
> handling is appropriate.
>
My Mailbox has 24 mb on it but it also handles the nntp server as well
although that is moving this week to another box. My scripts from the
main box connect to the net, start the dcc flood (so that my stuff is
upto date),
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, Craig R. Hughes said:
> Anyone have any thoughts for a cool release name for 2.30?
>
A) BanShee Screamer
or
B) Corundulla
Sean
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, Craig R. Hughes said:
> Sean Rima wrote:
>
> SR> I thought it would not affect me too much but even with a -m 2 and
> SR> a -s 61440 I reach a load average of over 15 which cripples my
> SR> poor old
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, Craig R. Hughes spake thusly:
> The -S flag to spamd should also help greatly in constrained hardware
> situations.
>
Never thought of that, thanks Craig.
Sean
- --
Sean Rimahttp://
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, Craig R. Hughes said:
> Sean Rima wrote:
>
> SR> But if I disable spamc in Exim (I used your example config) and
> SR> leave dcc only I never get above a load average of 2.3 and dccd is
> SR> flooding wit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, Jeremy Zawodny uttered the following:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 12:33:13AM +0100, Sean Rima wrote:
>>
>> > On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 12:19:20AM +0100, Sean Rima wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> &
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, Jeremy Zawodny yowled:
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 12:19:20AM +0100, Sean Rima wrote:
>> >
>> > It's going to be a rather long wait, I think. Perl 6 probably
>> > won't be production ready
hosting spamassassin and dcc anyway in July.
>
> It's going to be a rather long wait, I think. Perl 6 probably won't
> be production ready for a few years.
>
Darn, off to the forsale NG's to price a new P4 methinks :)
Sean
- --
Sean Rima
ge thing is that I have a couple of those dyn dns entries and
somethings I will get 3 or 4 spam mails at once, these also hit
performance. but the real problem is that I need something better than a
p133 to host spamd :)
Sean
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
down to machine instructions for
> improved performance. So it probably wouldn't be worth it to re-write
> SA in C.
Ahh okay might be worth the wait then. I maybe getting a new (for me
anyway) PII for hosting spamassassin and dcc anyway in July.
Sean
- --
Sean Rima
affect me too much but even with a -m 2 and a -s
61440 I reach a load average of over 15 which cripples my poor old mail
box :)
Sean
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE
up. My average is around 15 seconds, well it is an
old p133 the slowest appears to be 93 seconds. I am a dialup user and
when I go online off peak for the first time, fetchmail can throw over a
1000 emails at spam[c/d]. I also use DCC and have no performance
problems there.
My ISP is also looking at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is there any word on the C version of SA as I am getting him by
performance issuses.
Sean
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE
ther SA might have added.
Strnagely enough I got a spam a couple of days ago that had headers and
body text from SA 2.20 but as I use CVS and my ISP doesn't use SA and
the remote server connected direct to my ISPs box.
It looked like a clever attempt to cover up spam :) Stil
ed to my network, in fact it does
nothing and I was thinking of sticking the most basic setup on it and
then install SA.
Just curious as to whether or not this would help.
See Ya, Sean
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User: 231986 J
ssage. I think I saw a bugzilla
> ticket about it. I'll take a look and see if I can figure it out.
>
I downloaded the recent CVS about two hours ago and tested the whole
thing again, to date and fingers crossed, all mails are being scanned
with dcc turned on.
See Ya, Sea
urely that is what us bug busters who live life on the bleeding
edge are for :)
Please I am subscribed to this list
so there is no need to cc me a reply
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
THE VIE
cc me a reply
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF MY WIFE.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Use GPG f
x_attempts} < 1) {
I am not into perl in a great way so didn't check. Thanks for the
pointer.
Sean
Please I am subscribed to this list
so there is no need to cc me a reply
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [E
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/SpamAssassin.pm line 50.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/bin/spamd line 16.
Please I am subscribed to this list
so there is no need to cc me a reply
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User: 231986
uess I could do it some how in the local.cf. And yes the problem has
stopped. I am not sure what is causing it but I would prefer to use only
one step in doing all spam scanning.
Sean
Please I am subscribed to this list
so there is no need to cc me a reply
- --
Sean Rima
eout problems with it.)
>
> I haven't noticed any mail not getting filtered.
>
> If you disable the DCC support, does the problem go away?
I have just disabled it and restarted both exim and spamd and will see
what the result is.
Please I am subscribed to this list
so there is n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 5 May 2002, Charlie Watts stated:
> On Sun, 5 May 2002, Sean Rima wrote:
>
>> I have found recently that every so often mails are not being scanned
>> by SA, I cannot find a cause or rythm to it.
>
> You're goi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Folks
I have found recently that every so often mails are not being scanned by
SA, I cannot find a cause or rythm to it.
Sean
Please I am subscribed to this list
so there is no need to cc me a reply
- --
Sean Rima
ROTECTED]> Delivered-To:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from localhost (localhost
> [127.0.0.1]) by mail.syth.serveftp.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id
As you use Postfix, why not use Amavis to check your inbound for virii.
Please I am subscribed to this list
so there is no need to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 01 May 2002, Sean Rima outgrape:
>> Have you guys turned this on for sonic.net with DCC running against a
>> non-local DCC server?
>>
>
> I just checked my mail log for something else and noticed : May 1
&g
> Unfortunately, I'm seeing a remarkable increase in spamd timeouts
> (from which the procmail defaults to delivery without any SA header
> lines) -- I suspect the DCC server is impacted?
>
Surely if dcc times out then SA will continue, saying that I am testing
a local server
o this list
so there is no need to cc me a reply
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF MY WIFE.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/
>
What does 'cdcc info' say?
Sean
Please I am subscribed to this list
so there is no need to cc me a reply
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE NOT NECESSA
d that dcc is in SA
as it is as good as razor and using both will catch even more spams :)
Please I am subscribed to this list
so there is no need to cc me a reply
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [EMAIL PRO
d
> whitelist it could lead to false positives.
I have the white list that I was using prior to having it called from
SA. Saying that I had to add it to the dcc_options in the local.cf
Please I am subscribed to this list
so there is no need to cc me a reply
- --
Sean Rima
as it is not something I have a lot of
experience in so, I am glad that you were about to make it better :)
Sean
Please I am subscribed to this list
so there is no need to cc me a reply
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User: 231986 Jabber:
h Spam Assassin and it
is now catching them all. I have noticed one other bug, if I set
dcc_body_max in the system wide local.cf, it is being ignored. also if I
setdcc_fuz2_msx then if any scoree if greater than the max SA is not
marking as known to dcc.
See Ya, Sean
- --
Sean Rima
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Sean Rima said:
>>> SR> Use of uninitialized value at
>>> SR> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line
>>> SR> 270. DCC check skipped: Undefined subroutine
>>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Sean Rima spake:
>> SR> Use of uninitialized value at
>> SR> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line
>> SR> 270. DCC check skipped: Undefined subroutine
>> SR> &Mail::
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, Craig R. Hughes moaned:
> Sean Rima wrote:
>
> SR> Reference found where even-sized list expected at
> SR> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line 250.
>
> Weird -- that line looks
ned subroutine &Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus::open2
called at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line
270.
As you see, I am using an older version of Perl on my mailbox :) Maybe I
should upgrade.
See Ya, Sean
- --
Sean Rimahttp://w
value as a symbol reference at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line
236.
)
Dunno enough about perl to guess what is wrong.
See Ya, Sean
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [EMAIL P
s afternoon or evening. The patch looked
> good though, and passes all test w/out problem when DCC is *not*
> installed, so I checked it in.
>
Ahh, so it was already running here :) Have to diable the dcc router in
exim then :)
See Ya, Sean
- --
Sean Rima
to Razor, which supports fuzzy
> checksums.
>
Hopefully this will make it to the cvs, I have an auto update script,
that grabs the latest CVS version and auto installs it.
See Ya, Sean
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User: 231986
ssassin
>| #spamcheck:
>| # driver = pipe
>| # command = "/usr/local/bin/spamcheck.pl ${sender_address}
>
> You don't need spamcheck.pl if you use this configuration :
> http://dman.ddts.net/~dman/config_docs
>
Darn, you beat me to it, I was going to recomme
it is not
> rejected and nothing appear in the header of the email : X-Spam-Status: No,
> hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests= version=2.20
>
Have you made sure that /etc/mail/spamassassin is readable by the user
calling spamassassin.
See Ya, Sean
- --
Sean Rima
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 16 Apr 2002, Charlie Watts stipulated:
> On Sun, 14 Apr 2002, Sean Rima wrote:
>
>> I sent out a couple of spam reports this morning using Richochet. 2 of
>> the messages were bounced and returned via [EMAIL PROT
up running as a service loop.)
>
[cut]
Will have a look at this and try it this way to see what happens.
See Ya, Sean
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE N
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have Razor installed but find that I am getting a number of false hits
where dcc is not finding the same ones. Is there anyway to disable Razor
in the SA config.
See Ya, Sean
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
there a way to stop this.
Sean
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF MY WIFE.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux
; asap.
>>
>
> Done. Please, check it out and diff it against your copy, since I
> cropped it from a saved text file.
>
Strange thing is even though the SA list is whitelisted in my SA
local.cf and it had a SA line saying that, the original message still
stopped it, please let me know so I can report it if it is a fault.
Sean.
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF MY WIFE.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
>
> Received: from s1.uklinux.net (mail.uklinux.net [80.84.72.21])
> by belphegore.hughes-family.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA108FE00
> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 17:02:52 -0700 (PDT)
My ISP has been using it for around 3 months, they are co-
must be root while it binds the socket. It can drop privileges
> (setuid()) after that, though.
>
Yeah I forgot this, still it is not major problem as I have firewalled
783 anyway :)
Sean
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User: 231986
whatever reason I cannot get spamd to bind to the port as any user
except root.
Sean
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF MY WIFE.
-BEG
the uid you think it's running as.
>
Since I changed the permissions, I got this line in some personal mail
:) So things are looking up.
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-97.3 required=5.0
tests=NO_REAL_NAME,FROM_AND_TO_SAME,\NO_MX_FOR_FROM,SUBJ_MISSING,USER_IN_WHITELIST
version=2.20
Sean
uid you think it's running as.
>
I have done this and will see what happens with the next batch of mail.
Sean
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE NOT NE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Craig,
My ISP had a massive outage and I never did see if the ls -ld helped you
Sean
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE
ssin
sean@bsod:~ >
It is running under root
Sean
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF MY WIFE.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
Apr 5 10:24 local.cf~
Sean
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF MY WIFE.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment
by tcob1.net with smtp (Exim 4.01)
id 16qguL-0003Xb-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 28 Mar 2002 20:54:07 +
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
the site-wide local.cf and user_prefs contain:
whitelist_from *@tcob1.net
Sean
- --
Sean Rima
sign.
I think this is possible, it could also be that the open servers are for
people to test dcc and if it is what they want they to install the server.
> I don't think that it would be a good idea to configure SpamAssassin to
> talk to the central server run by Rhyolite, though. T
overwritten
Sean
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF MY WIFE.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Use GPG
___
>> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
>>
>>
>
> ___
> Spamassassin-talk mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 03 Apr 2002, Craig Hughes told this:
> On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 16:31, Sean Rima wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Duncan Findlay yowled:
>>
>> > Are you using a Pentium 100 with 40 MB RAM?
>>
>> No a
blem twice and both times I
can track it back to a problem with Razor. In fact, I run razor via
maildrop on tcob1 as well and that bombed out at the same time. I cam
currently trying dcc-proc on bsod via exim
Sean
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 3 Apr 2002, Duncan Findlay yowled:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 12:04:41PM +0100, Sean Rima wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> On 02 Apr 2002, Craig Hughes spake thusly:
>>
shing, checking the docs are
> up to date, re-scoring and we'll be set. nonspam.log submitters -- get
> ready to mass-check! Not quite yet, but soon.
>
I am grabbing the cvs version automatically so I am keeping an eye on
all the changes :)
Sean
- --
Sean Rima
d /sbin/init.d/skeleton to spamd edited to to
start/stop spamd and then symlinked it for rc2.d and rc3.d both S/K
If you need further details, reply to me off list
Sean
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [EMAIL
is below 5.0.
>
I used your setup and I have to admit that I tweaked it a bit for my own
setup but it does work fine. I discovered this morning that if there is
a problem with razor then SA will run wild. I disabled the razor setup
and it seems to be working fine. Saying that I may enab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] verbalised:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 09:59:44PM +0100, Sean Rima wrote:
>
>| I got back from a trip this evening and the mail box was running so many
>| childs of spamd that the mail box was un
runs (400+ emails) spamd works fine. I
had the problem but have noticed that as soon as I disabled the razor
check (using 1.19) it went away
Sean
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
THE VIEWS EXPRE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Duncan Findlay spake thusly:
> On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 09:59:44PM +0100, Sean Rima wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> I got back from a trip this evening and the m
control.
I am wondering is there anyway to stop spamd creating more than X child
processes
Sean
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF MY WIFE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi dman!
On Thu, 28 Mar 2002, dman wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 09:16:45PM +0000, Sean Rima wrote:
>
> | I am trying to setup spamassassin in conjection with Exim on a spare box
> | that will do virus scanning and spam check
this and my sole attempts have
resulted in the headers of the message becoming the body :(
Just curious if anyone has ever done this.
Sean
- --
Sean Rimahttp://www.tcob1.net
Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE
Has anyone setup spamproxyd with Exim 4 or 3.35
Sean
--
BBS and Fidonet News Portal at http://www.tcob1.net
Offering feeds for Fidonet, Adventurenet, and many other nets
See http://www.tcob1.net for more details
ICQ: 679813 Linux User: 231986 TCOB1 BBS: 095 43852 Yahoo: tcob_1
__
85 matches
Mail list logo
