-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sun, 5 May 2002, Charlie Watts stated:

> On Sun, 5 May 2002, Sean Rima wrote:
> 
>> I have found recently that every so often mails are not being scanned
>> by SA, I cannot find a cause or rythm to it.
> 
> You're going to have to give -way- more information about your system
> than that.
> 
> How are you calling SA?
> 
> How do you know these messages aren't being scanned (no SA headers?) ?
> 
> Are these messages over 256K ?

DOH!!! [slapping myself]

I am using SA (cvs version) on a P133 box being called from exim. I
start spamd and exim calls it using spamc. This method has caused me no
problems until the dccproc support was adding. However thereis no
timeout warning logged.

There are no SA headers in some messages although the exim received
lines show that it has been routed through it.

Please I am subscribed to this list
so there is no need to cc me a reply
- -- 
  Sean Rima                                http://www.tcob1.net
  Linux User:      231986          Jabber:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF MY WIFE.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Use GPG for Secure Mail

iD8DBQE81aJEeR/L2ZZp3E8RAutfAJ4iCqEdVNa9FC3r1LgqkhNKyvGbzwCfU5rP
/0NyQUDbPM+CaO0xLhB2ejI=
=xWd5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________________________

Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the recognition. Email Us: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to