-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 10 Jun 2002, Michael Stauber stipulated:
>> My ISP is also looking at SA but performance maybe a problem. > > Yes, it sure can be. I've set up SA for a couple of ISPs on their > Cobalt RaQ servers. Those RaQs are pretty outdated boxes (AMD K6/2 > with 300-450 MHz) and performance wise they don't have much to offer. > > Even with SPAMd/SPAMc I usually apply some performance breaks like > limiting SPAMd to accept only five simulteaneous connections (the -m 5 > switch and not scanning mails larger than 60k). Otherwise the load > would spike too much if too many mails come in at the same time. But > with -m 5 they're doing fine with processing up to 9000 mails a > day. If it's more than that I even skip the Razor checks to save on > performance. I thought it would not affect me too much but even with a -m 2 and a -s 61440 I reach a load average of over 15 which cripples my poor old mail box :) Sean - -- Sean Rima http://www.tcob1.net Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF MY WIFE. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Use GPG for Secure Mail iD8DBQE9A9dZeR/L2ZZp3E8RAhcJAJ4jiHeQa6d8lRd2BGMpDsDLDn7nzwCeIBZn SIzBLkHg3a696cKSuDJJF0A= =yj00 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
