-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03 Apr 2002, Craig Hughes uttered the following:
I downloaded and installed dccproc under Exim 4.02, it seems stable enough but from time to time I get the following in my syslog: Apr 4 07:43:17 tcob1 dccproc[23445]: no answer from dcc.rhyolite.com (195.74.212.70,6277) after 6534.07 ms I hazard a guess that the server is too busy to handle all calls but saying that in around 600+ emails I have only had this around 8 times since 3am (IST). I am toying with the idea of having a server as well to see if that helps, I tend to get a lot of spam that hits several accounts at once. Sean > Tony, I've been holding off on DCC until I thought it was a robust > enough system to use. I'm still somewhat haunted by Razor's > hiccuppiness in days gone by. In your experience is DCC nicely > stable/functional now? I was very intrigued by the project when I first > heard about it around 6 months or so ago now. > > In your impression of using it, is it ready to have the mailboxes of > several million (potentially) SpamAssassin mailboxes hitting its > servers? How easy is it to call out to DCC, both for verification and > for submission of new signatures? I'm guessing when it's time to > implement this in SA I'll have to sign up on the mailing list and get > into some discussion with the folks working on it, but before I do that, > what are your thoughts? > > C > > On Wed, 2002-04-03 at 14:31, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote: >> On Wed, 3 Apr 2002 the voices made Keith Pitcher write: >> >> > Anyone else ever bother to implement this or try it out? It looks a lot like >> > razor, but another check couldn't hurt as a ruleset for SA. Anything to help >> > detect spam has to be good. >> >> Yeah, I used it before SA (still using it); every now and then DCC catches >> something that SA doesn't, and if SA reported to DCC it would become even >> better. :-) >> >> >> /Tony >> -- >> Per scientiam ad libertatem. ©1999-2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> -- Random URL (4/10): >> <URL: http://www.slashdot.org/ > Who's getting ./:ed today? >> -- Random epigram: (10467/11671) >> We're mortal -- which is to say, we're ignorant, stupid, and sinful -- >> but those are only handicaps. Our pride is that nevertheless, now and >> then, we do our best. A few times we succeed. What more dare we ask for? >> -- Ensign Flandry >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Spamassassin-talk mailing list >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk - -- Sean Rima http://www.tcob1.net Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF MY WIFE. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Use GPG for Secure Mail iEYEARECAAYFAjysQCAACgkQeR/L2ZZp3E+DogCg4hjOIxK5xS1lI3QEf+U0jRd2 M2gAmwapNmOlZf1h8NVaRDN8P3Orq6X1 =nc7U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
