-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Michael Moncur stated:

>> Seems to work fine for me.  I've switched the require IPC::Open2 to
>> use IPC::Open2 but moved it to the top of the file.  Also removed the
>> = {} from the hash declaration.  All seems to work OK on my linux
>> machine.
> 
> I installed DCC and tried this earlier and got the same errors, but
> after the latest changes it works fine now (under RH 7.1) -
> spamc/spamd and spamassassin both work fine.
> 
> I piped a few archived spams through it and it successfully identified
> a couple as listed in DCC.
> 
> I think this is a great addition to SA! The score probably shouldn't
> be increased much over the current 2.0, though, since DCC is really a
> measure of "bulkness" rather than spammishness, and without a good
> whitelist it could lead to false positives.

I have the white list that I was using prior to having it called from
SA. Saying that I had to add it to the dcc_options in the local.cf

Please I am subscribed to this list
so there is no need to cc me a reply
- -- 
  Sean Rima                                http://www.tcob1.net
  Linux User:      231986          Jabber:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF MY WIFE.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Use GPG for Secure Mail

iEYEARECAAYFAjzO594ACgkQeR/L2ZZp3E/QHACfSxVuQ313uylbtSP7ebFCPb0U
1a0AoMWUFLOR3djSQRd3zn13zSa8+KW8
=kj87
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to