-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, Jeroen Scheerder told this:
>>Is there any word on the C version of SA as I am getting him by >>performance issuses. > > A C version of the daemon, you mean? Or are you running "spamassassin > -P"? > > Using the C client (spamc) against a local spamd (perl), most messages > (about 75%) are logged on my systems (E250's) as 0 seconds. About 20% > takes 1 second, and a handful of messages takes more; but never more > than 5 seconds, so far. > Yeah the spam[c/d] setup. My average is around 15 seconds, well it is an old p133 the slowest appears to be 93 seconds. I am a dialup user and when I go online off peak for the first time, fetchmail can throw over a 1000 emails at spam[c/d]. I also use DCC and have no performance problems there. My ISP is also looking at SA but performance maybe a problem. Sean - -- Sean Rima http://www.tcob1.net Linux User: 231986 Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] THE VIEWS EXPRESSED HERE ARE NOT NECESSARILY THOSE OF MY WIFE. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Use GPG for Secure Mail iD8DBQE9A9FneR/L2ZZp3E8RAm/uAKDc5FspVKhfo+eamQrNOmKjt5fRUwCgm61S VDhOCoGuD7mtRzagOVq8wJE= =rJkM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
