The attached message sent through spamcop has tripped the
FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA. Maybe it needs to be looked at?
--
Scott Lambert KC5MLE System Administrator
Attention Customers:
Refer-A-Friend and receive one month of service for free!
For further details, please visit
mething similar. The style rule just wasn't getting nearly all
of them.
rawbody INCH_NOPOINT_1 /\]*\bsize(=3d|=)0/i
describe INCH_NOPOINT_1 INCH CUSTOM RULE -- 0pt font size tag
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix
ist server's IP (Server B)? That
way you avoid the hop through Server A.
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Pre
S and %#&&$^ come out to play. Sometimes I'm wrong but I don't
get ulcers worrying about it.
Bikeshed -- See :
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/misc.html#BIKESHED-PAINTING
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
[EMAI
t directly rather
than making a spamc call which causes a fork in spamd to filter the
message.
I have never used amavisd so I probably don't know what I'm talking
about.
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
TOR is good for
+16.
A lot of people on this list need to calm down and stop over-reacting.
I seem to remember something about babies and bathwater.
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 10:18:58PM -0500, Larry Gilson wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > On Behalf Of Scott Lambert
> > Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 7:32 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Miss
scanning time, among other things.
If you are not exceeding the 30 second timeout with spamd, you may not
have enough spamd processess allowed to handle the simultaneous spamc
requests.
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 06:10:56PM -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 05:46 PM 1/14/2004, Scott Lambert wrote:
> >I would like to be able to match the forged HELO then use it in a
> >variable for the two X-AntiAbuse lines. Possible?
>
> meta rules allow you to do boolean and or
legit.
I would like to be able to match the forged HELO then use it in a
variable for the two X-AntiAbuse lines. Possible?
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This
/SpamAssassin/javascript_address_spam.zip
This is the page mozilla took me to when the mbox was uncompressed or
gzipped. That's why I zip'ed it instead. Sorry for the hassle.
http://oceantricks.com/?affiliate_id=231902&campaign_id=401
Advertising Generic V. and Cal(whatever that
checking | formail -s spamc -u ${SPLFILE} >> ${SPLFILE};
#UNLOCK the ${SPLFILE};
#RM or BACKUP or IGNORE ${SPLFILE}.checking;
done;
Or something like that. Error checking is left as an excersize for the
reader.
Additional pipelining could seperate into ${SPLFILE}.(spam|ham)
On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 12:20:33PM -0500, Kris Deugau wrote:
> IMHO, kernel-level file locks are far cleaner, but I don't know whether
> you can even do that cleanly with files accessed through DB_File. :/
Kernel locks don't work so well with NFS shared directories.
-
> Preferably not as if someone does forge it, then the mail goes straight
> through...
Isn't that what whitelist_from_rcvd is for? man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
bayes lock file to be left laying around which
added a 10 second timeout to every message. I twigged to that when my
1.6GHz Athlon started averaging 10 seconds per message.
None of my 4 day job spamd servers have had sig 6 issues with identical
software configurations, and a lot more e-mail.
--
t as spam.
Make sure you use the RBL checks and the DCC and RAZOR2.
Last, but not least, upgrade to SA 2.61 to improve your chances of
catching a lot of the newer flavors of spam.
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
area, 1 to 5 times in the body text area, 1 to 3 times
> in the link text area, 1 to 4 times in the alt text area, and 1 to 5 in
> the header text area.
>
> TrafficPost Newsletter 2003 All Rights Reserved.
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe from the Traffic Post Newsletter HR
main.
I have a three box cluster of Akamai boxes in my rack. Makes the
frequent MS Software Updates for remote exploits come in a lot faster,
even though I have an extra 100Mbps or so laying around unused.
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE
On Thu, Nov 20, 2003 at 12:42:25PM -0800, ian douglas wrote:
> My rule definition:
>
> rawbody W98_UNSUBSCRIBE4 /prefer not to(?: ) see/i
>
rawbody W98_UNSUBSCRIBE4 /prefer not to ?see/i
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
[EMA
err log below.
> Any clues???
I'm going to bet you are swapping to death. If using spamd/spamc, check
out spamd's -m option. Better to let a couple through unscanned than to
take the machine down.
--
Scott Lambert
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
e.
>
Are the perl DBD libraries installed? Can you use mysql from the
command line?
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This sf.net email is spon
On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 09:39:18PM +0200, Chr. von Stuckrad wrote:
> So may be something like this hit us too...
>
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 02:57:14PM -0400, Scott Lambert wrote:
> > If spamc can't connect to spamd, (all slots full on the spamd server),
> > it just
server),
it just passes the message through. If spamd dies while running under
something like DJB's daemontools, one to several messages could get
through while the spamd daemon is being restarted.
You probably need more spamd hardware/time slots.
--
Scott LambertKC
On Wed, Sep 10, 2003 at 04:03:02PM -0700, John Schneider wrote:
> Please forgive me if this is already answered in the list archives. But, if
> it is, I didn't find it:
cd ${WHEREYOUUNPACKEDTHESOURCE};
find . -name 'README*' -print;
cat ${FILETHATLOOKSRELEVANT
in --lint" to make sure you don't have errors in
your user_prefs?
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites
Linux so
you can offload the spamassassin checks. You can do that for cheap.
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future
of Java(
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 11:48:18AM -0400, Andrew wrote:
> Scott Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have a similar number of accounts on my mail server. I have a P4 1.5GHz
> > 1G RAM Dell workstation running spamd. The box coasts most of the day and
> >
now if that information is helpful to your situation.
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future
of Java(TM) technology. Join t
bert/SpamAssassin/ if anyone wants to
look.
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Influence the future
of Java(TM) technology. Join the Ja
se
but, until then, it is not a major burden to us to add the entries for
the users who need/want special settings.
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This sf.net email is
had 20257 non-spam messages and 24260 spam messages.
54.496% spam messages.
Here is a typical weekend report:
SpamAssassin statistics for 2002/10/20:
Time spent processing all messages: 32233
Total messages processed: 28454
Average processing time per message: 1.13281
A
ly for my ISP in that configuration. We haven't seen any
appreciable load increase on the mail servers since beginning use of
SpamAssassin site wide.
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE Unix SysAdmin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
13-15 | ***
15-17 | *
17-19 | *
19-21 | **
20-50 | **
something like that?
Easy to do with a quick perl or awk script. Send it to your self as
e-mail or embed it in a web page as PRE section.
--
Scott LambertKC
n't seem to be getting the DJB magic incantations right for running
spamd under daemontools. Would someone care to tell me how it should be
configured?
My users love SpamAssassin. They kill me when it's down for 10 minutes.
Thanks!
--
Scott LambertKC5MLE
34 matches
Mail list logo
