cker-Version header).
Anyone any ideas?
Thanks,
John.
--
---
John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK Tel: +44 (0)1752 233914
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fax: +44 (0)1752 233839
-
is flagged as spam but the subject line
hasn't been changed. The system-wide /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
file contains:
rewrite_subject 1
I have stopped and restarted spamassassin.
Anyone any ideas?
Thanks,
John.
--
-----
ut using SA with exim, so both
products are obviously in good use! :-) The exim list archives will have
the messages relating to exim with SA (http://www.exim.org).
John.
--------
John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK Tel: +44
might want to
know :-)
Regards,
John.
----
John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK Tel: +44 (0)1752 233914
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP key available from public key servers
---
Thi
ether the user discards it or simply puts the mail into
a different folder is of course up to them.
That's it. Regards,
John.
John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK
On Fri, 2002-05-31 at 23:13, Harry Putnam wrote:
> John Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Your observation got me closely checking my home made rules and
> edits. I checked by commenting them all then, uncommenting one by
> one. I found that this rule seems to be the cu
d
redirecting any output to a file. I can't test this at the moment since I'm
doing other things on the system :-)
John.
John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK Tel: +44 (0)1752 233914
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> procmail.log, which is set to verbose.
>
Have you set the syslog 'mail' level to debug - i.e. in /etc/syslog.conf
have 'mail.debug /var/log/sendmail' (or whatever)?
(Don't forget to restart syslog as well.)
Regards,
John.
On 30-May-2002 at 15:47:54 Matt Sergeant wrote:
> John Horne wrote:
>> Is there a wish list for spamassassin at all?
>
> Yes, bugzilla has a "Wishlist" category.
>
Want to give me a hint where
a command line option. Has anyone done this already? Does it
sound at all useful to other people?
Thanks,
John.
----
John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK Tel: +44 (0)1752 233914
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP key availa
e to BSTMP timeouts. So any performance issues are being looked at.
>
I've started using the '-L' recently too, I think our exim MTA does enough
(?) network/DNS checks already. You may want to look at the '-S' option on
spamd as well :-)
John.
----
How do you run spamassassin per message with the directors/transports?
Surely at this point exim is doing deliveries per recipient, the system
filter will handle per message requirements. (I have that awful feeling that
I'm asking something stupid here! :-) )
John.
-
On 23-May-2002 at 16:40:46 Corwin Grey wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 05:26:26PM +0100, John Horne wrote:
>> On 23-May-2002 at 15:38:32 Corwin Grey wrote:
>
>> No, we run spamc from the Exim MTA, however I think your statements are
>> still applicable in as much as
On 23-May-2002 at 15:38:32 Corwin Grey wrote:
> On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 02:05:57PM +0100, John Horne wrote:
>> May 23 14:02:55 tracy.csd.plymouth.ac.uk spamd[29334]: connection from
>> localhost [ 127.0.0.1 ] at port 32922
>> May 23 14:02:55 tracy.csd.plymouth.
f spamd is running as root, my understanding is that when it is
called via spamc then it takes on that user. In our case it will be the MTA
process, and so I would not expect to see 'unknown' there.
Is this right?
Thanks,
John.
---
On 21-May-2002 at 15:23:56 Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Tue, 21 May 2002, John Horne wrote:
>> I guess the question should be should 'make test' ignore any
>> pre-installed configuration file? Is this mentioned anywhere in the
> docs? If it is then I missed it.
>
On 20-May-2002 at 16:21:47 John Horne wrote:
> On 20-May-2002 at 10:59:00 John Horne wrote:
> Damn! Spoke too soon when I reported that this was sorted on the solaris 7
> system. I've just installed perl 5.6.1 with no problems onto one of the
> mailhubs (solaris 8); rebuilt s
On 20-May-2002 at 10:59:00 John Horne wrote:
> So, I thought I'd move this up onto one of the central mailhubs. These are
> Sun Solaris 8 (sparc) systems. They have perl version 5.6.0 on them; no
> razor. The 'perl Makefile.PL' worked okay, as did 'make'. But wit
On 20-May-2002 at 10:59:00 John Horne wrote:
> So, I thought I'd move this up onto one of the central mailhubs. These are
> Sun Solaris 8 (sparc) systems. They have perl version 5.6.0 on them; no
> razor. The 'perl Makefile.PL' worked okay, as did 'make'. But wit
On 20-May-2002 at 14:38:53 Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Mon, 20 May 2002, John Horne wrote:
>
>> I get a whole load of failed tests:
>
> Are you using the 2.20 release, or the latest SA from CVS?
>
> There was an errorneous cvs commit over the weekend that damaged one of
st archives and can find nothing about
this, I've also gone through all the docs I could find.
Has anyone else had this problem, and/or know what the problem is?
Thanks,
John.
John Horne, University of Plymouth,
21 matches
Mail list logo
