[SAtalk] problem with userprefs and SQL (spamass-milter)

stupid questions, but maybe you can give me an answer or a hint... thanks in advance daniel signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

[SAtalk] problem with userprefs and SQL (spamass-milter)

be? is my setup (which works ok so far) totally wrong? sorry for my stupid questions, but maybe you can give me an answer or a hint... thanks in advance daniel signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

Re: [SAtalk] spamc output different from spamassassin?

On Wed, 31 Dec 2003, Robert Menschel wrote: > Check > http://www.spamassassin.org/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#privileged%20settings > specifically the allow_user_rules setting. If you don't allow user_prefs > rules, then no spamd/spamc execution will use them. > > DE> I thought perhaps spamc/s

[SAtalk] spamc output different from spamassassin?

I recently added some personal rules to my user_prefs and tested them by running a few mail messages through spamassassin. They seem to work fine, but I'm still getting the spam and the rules aren't getting triggered. I've tracked this down to an apparent difference between spamc and spamassassi

[SAtalk] SpamAssassin Procmail

I read through the readme and made a config change to the way procmail and spamassassin work together, however I now get the error:   couldn't create or rename temp file. "/var/spool/mail/il -oi [EMAIL PROTECTED]   I have a default /etc/procmailrc with the lines   :0fw: spamassassin.lock * <

Re: [SAtalk] spamassassin procmail

ROTECTED]> To: "SpamAssassin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:50 AM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spamassassin procmail > > > --On Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:44 AM -0700 Daniel Kaliel > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > &g

[SAtalk] spamassassin procmail

I  read through the readme and made a config change to the way procmail and spamassassin work together, however I now get the error:   couldn't create or rename temp file. "/var/spool/mail/il -oi [EMAIL PROTECTED]   I have a default /etc/procmailrc with the lines   :0fw: spamassassin.lock *

[SAtalk] Postfix - Procmail - SpamAssassin Config

Nevermind all, sorry for the post, I got it working. Thanks, Daniel --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's Free Linux Tutorials. Learn every

[SAtalk] Postfix - procmail - spamassassin config

Hey At least once a week our server hangs. I can't figure this out. It seems to be hanging when spamassassin is working on large emails. Here is how I have it setup and where I am confused. My confusion lies in this. If I use the mailbox_command field in postfix do I need all of below, or wil

[SAtalk] sa-learn scripts for mbox files

I wrote some small scripts to take an mbox file (like you would find in /var/spool/mail), split the messages apart, and send them to sa-learn. sa-learn does not split messages apart itself (at least in version 2.60). Check it out at http://www.lost-habit.com/learnscripts.html . Nice if you have a

[SAtalk] Final Configurations

This is more of a procmail question. But I can't seem to find the answer. I have procmail handling the email and dealing with spam messages properly, thanks to this forum! However the final step is that some people have blackberries and although they get email through the .forward, they still get

[SAtalk] spam header not getting written sometimes

an reproduce this by sending several thousand GTUBEs to myself. -- Daniel Drucker / [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create bett

Re: [SAtalk] Razor2 patch applied, still getting Bad file descriptor errors

of the patch, but so far, no luck. I think now I am just going to not worry about it and zero out the Razor scores, because SA is actually working extremely well without it (thanks, SA folks!). Thanks, Daniel --- This SF.net email is sponsore

[SAtalk] Razor2 patch applied, still getting Bad file descriptor errors

deal with the issue even after the patch is applied. Thanks for any and all help! On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 12:56, Daniel wrote: > Hello all, > > I've upgraded to SA 2.60, and I thought I'd followed the directions for > applying the Razor2 patch included in the src. But appare

[SAtalk] false positive for MS Remote Assisstance invites

rg X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=4.5 required=4.0 tests=MICROSOFT, MSGID_OUTLOOK_INVALID autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Spam-Report: * 0.2 MICROSOFT BODY: Mentions microsoft * 4.3 MSGID_OUTLOOK_INVALID Message-Id is fake (in Outlook Express format) -- Da

[SAtalk] About FORGED_IMS_TAGS

nd, but please reply directly to me (or CC me), as I'm not subscribed to this list. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) Gerencia de Operacoes Divisao de Comunicacao de Dados Coordenacao de Seguranca VIVO Centro Oeste Norte Fones: 55-61-313-7654/Cel: 55-61-9618-0904 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [SAtalk] Duplicate postings. (clarification)

On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Colin A. Bartlett wrote: > Charles Gregory Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 4:33 PM > > > Just at a rough guess, I would say that whoever resides on or near > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] or 'force9.net' has > > something strange in their mail handling that is re-mailing articles? >

[SAtalk] Razor2 patch applied, still getting Bad file descriptor errors

Hello all, I've upgraded to SA 2.60, and I thought I'd followed the directions for applying the Razor2 patch included in the src. But apparently, I've not done everything correctly because I still get the: razor2 check skipped: Bad file descriptor Insecure dependency in connect while running set

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin not rewriting the e-mail subject.

It worked ! Thanks to everybody who helped me to solve the problem. Have a nice day. Daniel P.S. Sorry for my bad english. Jason Staudenmayer wrote: qmail-scanner.pl find the spamassassin binary line and remove the '-c' -Original Message----- From: Daniel Poulin [mai

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin not rewriting the e-mail subject.

spamd[8082]: checking message (unknown) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0. Oct 29 06:38:58 listy spamd[8082]: identified spam (17.8/8.0) for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:0 in 0.3 seconds, 1852 bytes. Thanks in advance. Daniel Matt Kettler wrote: At 09:15 AM 10/29/03 -0500, you wrote: Hi everyone, require

[SAtalk] Spamassassin not rewriting the e-mail subject.

y configuration file. Thanks in advance. Daniel syslog : Oct 29 06:38:58 listy spamd[7540]: connection from listy [127.0.0.1] at port 33152 Oct 29 06:38:58 listy spamd[8082]: Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/local/bin/spamd line 1104, line 2. Oct 29 06:38:58 listy spam

RE: [SAtalk] SpamAss is tagging my own emails

There should be something in the headers of the messages from your own e-commerce system that you can use to recognize those messages. Put a procmail recipe in to route them directly through to delivery without even feeding them to spamassassin I might be tempted to look for the ip address of my w

Re: [SAtalk] [RD]Consonant and Vowel Pairs or Sequences

nderstandable. meta rules can use other meta rules. Also, the convention is all uppercase for rule names, but we'd rename it anyway, so that's not a big deal. - Daniel --- This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations Here&

[SAtalk] Re: Swap Space

;ll happen again soon so I can actually see the graphs and maybe figure out what's going on... -- Daniel Drucker / [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterprise Linux Forum Conference & Expo The Event For Linux Dat

[SAtalk] child spamds sitting around forever

(Running 2.60) I'm having a problem where sometimes I end up with dozens of spamds taking 100% CPU, driving my load average up to 50 or so. Anyone else see this? -- Daniel Drucker / [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.net email sponsor

Re: [SAtalk] Re: RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK

your email into > SpamAssassin? Do you use a milter with Sendmail, procmail, et al.? Mail comes into Exim, gets piped through spamc, and then re-injected to exim with the spam-scanned protocol name. Daniel --- This SF.net email sponsored by:

[SAtalk] Re: Swap Space

ing 1 or 2 spamds to having 40 or 50 of them. It goes into swap, the load average goes up to sixty or more, and the machine grinds to a halt. I've set up a perl script to kill all spamds and restart the spamd service if it sees more than 10 instances, but that's a hack - I'd rather j

Re: [SAtalk] Re: RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK

> At 03:10 PM 10/16/2003, Daniel M. Drucker wrote: > >I wasn't even aware that this notfirsthop argument existed; as far as > >I can tell in a few minutes of testing, the argument has no effect. > >I've had to disable all dynamic-IP RBLs because of this proble

[SAtalk] Re: RCVD_IN_DYNABLOCK

sn't even aware that this notfirsthop argument existed; as far as I can tell in a few minutes of testing, the argument has no effect. I've had to disable all dynamic-IP RBLs because of this problem... -- Daniel Drucker / [EMAIL PROTECTED] --

Re: [SAtalk] Content-Disposition: inline ?

PerMsgStatus.pm: Yeah, that's a good one, thanks. I am not afraid of > messing around with the SA source code. > > But as I said, I am using spamd/spamc. Is this perl module really > evaluated by spamd on startup? Yes. Daniel --

Re: [SAtalk] Content-Disposition: inline ?

;' Note that "inline" is used (in 2.60, I don't remember what 2.55 did) if the message is lacking a Content-Type: header or the Content-Type: header is text/plain. Daniel -- Daniel Quinlan anti-spam (SpamAssassin), Linux, and open http://www.pathname.com/~q

Re: [SAtalk] Consonant and Vowel Pairs or Sequences

"Fred I-IS.COM" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I created a list which might be helpful, using a dictionary I searched for > letter pairs which did not exist. I created the following meta rule to > search for these non-existant pairs, it might do just what you are looking > for. Your meta rule see

Re: [SAtalk] More HTML Obfuscation: This One Made It Through

gt; # Obfuscate text by using ISO 8859-1 character set HEX encoding > rawbody MY_RBDY_OBFU_ISOH /\%(4[1-9]|[5-7][0-9]|[4-6][A-F]|7[A-E])\D/i > describe MY_RBDY_OBFU_ISOH MY: OBFU text with ISO HEX set > scoreMY_RBDY_OBFU_ISOH 4.0 The HTTP_EXCESSIVE_ESCAPES rule is basically the same

Re: [SAtalk] score for messages with empty bodies?

Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How can I add points for messages with empty bodies? > Assume the Lines: header is unreliable. > Please CC me if you reply. Hmmm... this should work. rawbody __SOMETHING /\S/ meta BODY_EMPTY !__SOMETHING score BODY_EMPTY

[SAtalk] Re: holy cow, FN city

could. :-) I'm sure non-English ones are higher due to foreign spam. Which, by the way, could also be a useful token (as suggested by Justin Mason), the possible language guesses from the TextCat.pm module (which is *really* slow, but some people alre

Re: [SAtalk] Re: holy cow, FN city

dicates that new tokens (in the body) have a spam probability of about 0.83, at least for me. Right now, I don't think they're used at all. Daniel --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts o

Re: [SAtalk] bayes over NFS

[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes: > Our locking code is NFS-safe. However IMO I'd say it's very slow over > NFS... bayes dbs are *big* and pretty much random-access. In theory, it's safe. In practice, it

Re: [SAtalk] Good for 50%??

by your ISP (or site) to some extent before you even see it, so SpamAssassin is only seeing the really hard spam. Once you Bayes to 200 ham and 200 spam, then it will kick in and it helps quite a bit. Daniel --- This sf.net email is sponsored b

[SAtalk] ANNOUNCE: SpamAssassin working to join Apache Software Foundation

The SpamAssassin development team would like to announce that we intend to become part of the Apache Software Foundation . We are now working on the final steps required before the Apache Software Foundation can approve our request. We believe that this transition will bene

Re: [SAtalk] Problem starting 2.6 with sudo

On Mon, 6 Oct 2003, Mark Edwards wrote: > I'm having a problem starting spamd via sudo. This is using the current > FreeBSD port, and the behavior started with SA 2.6. I can start it > successfully if I su to root, but if I try to use sudo, I get: > > sudo /usr/local/etc/rc.d/spamd.sh start > In

Re: [SAtalk] Upgrading to 2.60 questions

NO bayes performed great for its duration. Of > course, we are always looking to improve the system, and look forward > to any feedback on these issues. Daniel --- This sf.net email is sponsored

[SAtalk] new mail containing old headers

Subject [SAtalk] new mail with old headers Is there a score for mail that comes in more than 4 days old? I had Nigerian spam come in today, that was properly flagged as such, and the date/time stamps from my server are accurate, but I would like to add additional weight for spamishness when all t

RE: [SAtalk] Prevalence of BASE64 messages containing '

On Wed, 1 Oct 2003, Chris Santerre wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Shane Allen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 3:43 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [SAtalk] Prevalence of BASE64 messages containing > > 'http://www.emphasys.net > > > > 1) Yo

[SAtalk] new mail with old headers

Is there a score for mail that comes in more than 4 days old? I had Nigerian spam come in today, that was properly flagged as such, and the date/time stamps from my server are accurate, but I would like to add additional weight for spamishness when all the other Recieved or Date headers are more t

[SAtalk] can't install

Can't test without successful make Running make install make had returned bad status, install seems impossible Regards, Daniel Tan 67469188 Ext.665 DID: 68430665 MIS Department Shop N Save Pte Ltd : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [This e-mail is confidential and may also be privileged. If you are n

Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 upgrade: razor2 check skipped

, the taint-mode problems in Razor2 become a non-issue. Daniel --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing

Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 num_check_received

mail from outside accounts to our domain and > therefore bypass RBL checks at the MTA-level (since the forwarding SMTP > server is not on any RBLs). > > How does its replacement trusted_networks solve this problem? Specify that you trust those IP addresses (and the forwarding SMTP

Re: [SAtalk] STATISTICS.txt

e than any other tests. Of course, that's until a blacklist changes policy (read: Monkeys) or goes under while designating the entire internet as a spammer IP address (read: Osirusoft). We try our best to avoid blacklists that are questionable or seem apt

Re: [SAtalk] X-Spam-Status and content scoring disagree?

second message is checked somewhere else and it stops looking so much like spam since the headers are entirely new, generated by SpamAssassin, etc. Daniel --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcom

Re: [SAtalk] razor2 check skipped: Proposed SpamAssassin FAQ

Added (with a few trivial changes) to the FAQ, thanks. http://spamassassin.taint.org/faq/index.cgi?req=all#2.6 Daniel --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf

Re: [SAtalk] Is HOST_PATTERN wrong?

Can you submit a bug for this? http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/ Thanks! Daniel --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Spamassassin-talk

Re: [SAtalk] Any RBL's down recently for SA 2.55?

I recommend upgrading to 2.60. It has a more recent list of RBLs and a much better timeout algorithm. Daniel --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf

Re: [SAtalk] Problem applying Razor2 patch

nes). Hunk #2 succeeded at 378 (offset 10 lines). patching file Client/Core.pm Hunk #1 succeeded at 218 (offset 2 lines). Daniel --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf

Re: [SAtalk] razor2 check skipped: Bad file descriptor

gt; line 1438. Read the README file. Or the INSTALL file. Or the 2.60 announcement. Or the spamassassin-talk mailing list archive. Or the Razor2.patch under http://www.spamassassin.org/released/ or in the 2.60 release itself. Daniel --

Re: was Re: [SAtalk] Interesting discovery re: spamassassin/mimedefang/sendail.)

willie wrote: I use a MS OS desktop at home (at work I use Solaris and Redhat Linux)and have not put a virus scanner on it in over 3 years, and have not caught a virus yet. How do you KNOW you haven't? ;-) I HAVE received them but I choose not to use security risk software such as: Internet E

Re: [SAtalk] SPAM, BLOCK: Death of monkeys.com DNSbl (fwd)

Forrest Aldrich wrote: A new approach to DNSBL might be considered, where there is a peer-to-peer sharing (authentication, scoring whatever) that mirrors content -- something of that nature, whereby the hackers would basically have to DDos the entire internet to prevent its use. Not sure h

Re: [SAtalk] Updated RH perl-suidperl-5.8.0-88.3 breaks SA

revert to an older perl. Nope. http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html#beprecise Daniel --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___

Re: [SAtalk] A problem and a general question for SpamAssassin

ils? (Assuming 7.0 isn't specified elsewhere.) Daniel --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Spamassassin-talk mailin

Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 upgrade: razor2 check skipped

ors all over the place), will read the documentation *before* posting the same question again: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html Daniel --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf

Re: [SAtalk] why is sa not catching the microsoft emails ?

Simon Byrnand wrote: I've been getting tons of this mail usually with virus's attached. I am also getting messages that seem to orginate from our own server but they don't. The reason SpamAssassin doesn't catch them is twofold: Maybe I'm misinterpreting the original question, but was it no

Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 upgrade: razor2 check skipped

patch. > The instructions are located in the Razor2.patch file." Oh well. It still means 2.36 has the bug unless you remove "at least". *sigh* Daniel --- This sf.net emai

Re: [SAtalk] monkeys.dom UPL being DDOSed to death (fwd)

ning first if he was going to do that. I > also expect it's going to take more than a DDoS to take out monkeys.com > permanently. 1. SpamAssassin has never used Monkeys by default. 2. I have indirectly heard that Ron said he would not pull a "J

Re: [SAtalk] A problem and a general question for SpamAssassin

mAssassin doesn't modify the body at all. It will encapsulate it in a MIME attachment if it is spam (by default), though. See the "report_safe" option for more informatino. Daniel --- This sf.net email is sponsored

Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 and Dynamic IP Checks

; that functionality been lost in 2.60? The documentation might answer that question. (num_check_received still works for now, though.) Daniel --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to gee

Re: [SAtalk] 2.55 and FAILURE NOTICE's

Robert Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, have any improvements been made to sort out spammers who are > forging failure notices? Yes, in 2.60. Daniel --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek

Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 and Dynamic IP Checks

the bug. Also include your local.cf and user_prefs files. Daniel --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL

[SAtalk] 2 Things

1) How do you configure spamassassin working with postfix to limit to size of the emails that spamassassin attempts to process?   2) The partners in my firm have decided they want all Spam deleted not the subject renamed.  How is this done?  I can not find the appropriate variable to set in

RE: [SAtalk] why is sa not catching the microsoft emails ?

I am getting nailed with these as well, 72 for the day so far. Other admins I talked here have had over 100 so far on the day. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Stephen Reese Sent: September 23, 2003 3:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAta

Re: [SAtalk] sa-learn --dump

Theo Van Dinter wrote: On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 03:54:51PM +0100, Daniel Bird wrote: Also, as you can see above, It's showing no tokens learned even though I have run "sa-learn --import" from my previous install of SA2.55 ( I guess this may be in error becau

[SAtalk] sa-learn --dump

the error message above ?) Any guidance would be gratefully received. Regards -- ________ Daniel Bird Network and Systems Manager Department Of Information Services St. George's Hospital Medical School Tooting London SW17 0RE P: +44 20 8725 2897 F: +44 20 8725 3

RE: [SAtalk] Re: Spamassassin and qmail?

> There are 4 great open source MTAs out there : Postfix, Exim, sendmail and > qmail. > > 3 support spam and AV scanning with no patching. > > Save yourself the pain. What about not messing with qmail-queue or qmail-scanner at all. Just use a .qmail file in the user's dir. $ cat .qmail | /usr

Re: [SAtalk] Problem with razor2 check: No such file or directory Insecure dependency

stalled copy of Razor2, then let us know and we can proceed to debug. I have to assume that's not the case since you didn't mention the patch. Daniel --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://think

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin filters seem too weak out of the box...

nstitutes a REAL spam email, then step#7 s/probably state this. > > I never stated SA was a piece of [EMAIL PROTECTED] that filters 'seem' too weak > (ok, maybe I could've added a 'seem' before abysmal!). Believe it or not, I > have had spam as simple as my '

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.60 release

db_version. so we kluge around that by saving/setting caller_will_untie, then restoring after the forget(). 3) forget() didn't know it could "learn to journal", so it always went r/w. added a debug statement for bayes expiry

Re: [SAtalk] Error message from DCC since upgraded to RC5

Luis Hernán Otegui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > About $PATH: >> From the spamd start script: > PATH=$PATH:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin What's the _full_ PATH variable? Telling me that /usr/bin and /usr/local/bin were appended to PATH does not answer the question. > And yo

Re: [SAtalk] Error message from DCC since upgraded to RC5

f > the thing is that I've disabled DCC from the local.cf! "use_dcc 0" ? > why is SA still invoking it? Do you let users turn it back on or is it turned back on somewhere? - Daniel --- This sf.net email is sponsored

Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.60-rc6 released

h a try. I'd really like to see if we can get this licked before 2.60 ships (which is going to be really soon). I made it against 2.22, but I think it'll still apply with a bit of crankiness on later versions. - Daniel Razor2.patch Description: new attempt at razor2 patch

RE: [SAtalk] 2.60 Doc Changes

::SpamAssassin::Conf'. Have a botched part of the > installation? Assuming you have bash or tcsh, run: find /usr/{local/,}{share,man} -type f -name '*:Conf.*' -ls report back the results. Also probably worth showing the result of this: echo

Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 Doc Changes

(plural). > If there is a difference -- what is it. Also, were are the new docs, > and are there any other configuration changes I would need to make to > my setup to comply with 2.6x config conventions? If you have 2.60-rc6, look for "DEPRECATED OPTIONS" in Mail::SpamAss

Re: [SAtalk] blocking executable's

> up time on a dialup. I'm using a straight qmail/SA setup. If someone > could point me in the right direction it would be most appreciated. Just raise the score for .exe attachments: score MICROSOFT_EXECUTABLE 10 Daniel --- This sf.

Re: [SAtalk] Grrr...Bayes db corrupted again!

ites: > Same issue - on my system it seems to happen when the > bayes_toks file reaches about 5000K, so am experimenting > with setting a lower max database size: [...] Which Perl DB module and perl version are you both using? Daniel ---

Re: [SAtalk] Spamassassin & Q-Mail "Proxy" Server

On Thu, 18 Sep 2003, Christopher Tarricone wrote: > I am going to be setting up a q-mail ³proxy² server in between the Internet > and one of my Exchange servers. I am using qmail and qmail-scanner to handle > viruses and I have other mail server that simply use q-mail, courier, SA and > QSS. There

Re: [SAtalk] Free ISP access to Cloudmark rating program

f view as to what constitutes "free" (like MAPS, Habeas, and BondedSender), but free only for ISPs is not exactly going to be a major priority. Daniel --- This sf.net email is spons

Re: [SAtalk] how do I test for viagro in the subject

AL_VIAGRO 1.0 Daniel --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.

Re: [SAtalk] New warning starting spamd with 2.60-rc5

"Christopher X. Candreva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Under rc5, spamd gives this warning on start-up: > > Use of uninitialized value in scalar assignment at > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util.pm line

Re: [SAtalk] Auto Learn Question

ouldn't suggest changing them too much. To achieve good accuracy, auto-learning only learns from messages that are particularly spammy or particularly non-spammy. Daniel --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:T

Re: [SAtalk] Grrr...Bayes db corrupted again!

a successful open like: open("/usr/lib/perl/5.6.1/DB_File.pm", O_RDONLY|O_LARGEFILE) = 6 Or, you can just see which ones you have installed. In SpamAssassin 2.55, the order of preferences is DB_File first, then GDBM_File, NDBM_File, and SDB

Re: [SAtalk] No X-Spam-Report for ham?

ing hit and/or > need to be tweaked. in 2.5x: always_add_report 1 in 2.60: add_header all Report _REPORT_ Daniel --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf __

Re: [SAtalk] Scan Message Max Size

Using large size as a rule never really worked all that well, though. 256k seems like a good limit. 128k would be quite good too. Daniel --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf __

Re: [SAtalk] writing a filter for masked word

"Robin Witkop-Staub" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How would be the syntax in a filter in the subject line to look for this > masked word? header LOCAL_MASKED_LIPS Subject =~ /l\|ps/i Daniel --- This sf.

Re: [SAtalk] RD - Here is a rule to check for Verisign redirect domain

asily keep up with any ip changes that might happen. That only works until Verisign sets up DNS round robin. Daniel --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___

RE: [SAtalk] Help Unblacklisting RBL

On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Jennifer Wheeler wrote: > I completely agree with your opinion about the open proxy biz. I'll see > if we can get them to take care of that on their end. In the meantime, > I've been asked to get these particular emails through to us without a > spam tag :) I'm just having

Re: [SAtalk] RD - Here is a rule to check for Verisign redirect domain

_IP eval:check_rbl_sub('sitefinder', '64.94.110.11') > describe SITEFINDER_IP From: resolves to a verisign hijacked domain. > score SITEFINDER_IP 1.5 Ah, abuse of the DNS code, I like it! Daniel --- T

Re: [SAtalk] Razor 2.22- 2.36 Taint issue patch

; +push @list, $1; > +$pushed = 1; > +} > } elsif ($rr->type eq "CNAME") { > if ($rr->cname eq 'list.terminator') { > pop @list if $pushed; The patch

Re: [SAtalk] Help Unblacklisting RBL

able to do this) 3. If you want to avoid marking a domain's messages as spam, regardless of why they are marked as spam, use "whitelist_from". 4. If you want to avoid having a site listed by Monkeys, it's something you'll have to take up the site such that the site

Re: [SAtalk] Razor2.patchfile missing?

+push @list, $1; +$pushed = 1; +} } elsif ($rr->type eq "CNAME") { if ($rr->cname eq 'list.terminator') { pop @list if $pushed; --- end Daniel --

Re: [SAtalk] How to process a local DNS query?

cords are okay unless the A record is for a non-existing domain + $count++ if ($rr->type eq "A" && $rr->address ne "64.94.110.11"); } dbg ("DNS A records found: $count"); return 0 if ($count > 0); Daniel ---

Re: [SAtalk] The Verisign folly

On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Matt Thoene wrote: > On Tuesday, September 16, 2003 @ 11:09:25 AM [-0700], Covington, Chris wrote: > > > All interested parties should read: > > > http://www.iab.org/Documents/icann-vgrs-response.html > > > I just hope Verisign doesn't read this as "OK, we'll change an aspect

Re: [SAtalk] The Verisign folly

eir web server IP address to be the same thing as NXDOMAIN. Daniel --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 RC4 deletes local.cf

Mike, This should be fixed in the third patch contained in this bug: http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2452 Please test and let us know if it works. Daniel P.S. You wouldn't happen to be using Perl 5.005, woul

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >