> -Original Message-
> From: Justin Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2003 3:39 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Is version 2.53 released ???
>
>
>
> Folks -- more importantly -- is anyone using it, and *does it
> help*? ;)
>
> --j.
>
can
> -Original Message-
> From: Justin Mason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 1:13 PM
> To: Larry Rosenman
> Cc: Louis LeBlanc; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; David Rees
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Bayes
>
>
>
> Larry Rosenman said:
>
> > It (2.50) seems to be doing the righ
i have my razor checking finally working, but i figured if I set
report_headers = 1
in razor-agent.conf I would get a header telling me something?
i do have my razor-agent.conf set in local.cf
razor_config /etc/razor/razor-agent.conf
and by running spamd -D i see that it does rea
> -Original Message-
> From: Dallas Engelken
> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 11:41 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: Razor home, conf, identity issue on 2.50-cvs
>
>
> i set the following options in my local.cf to use razor and
> razor2. i
i set the following options in my local.cf to use razor and razor2. i have installed
the appropriate razor sdk and agents bundles...
use_razor1 1
use_razor2 1
razor_timeout 2
razor_config
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Earnshaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 9:02 AM
> To: Dallas Engelken
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] RE: Outlook FN --> sa-learn-spam
>
>
> fre, 2003-02-14 kl. 15:14 skrev Dal
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Earnshaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 3:34 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] RE: Outlook FN --> sa-learn-spam
>
>
> tor, 2003-02-13 kl. 23:36 skrev Dallas Engelken
> -Original Message-
> From: Tony Earnshaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:25 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Bounce spam to bayes classifier with Outlook
>
>
> tir, 2003-02-11 kl. 15:44 skrev DEFFONTAINES Vincent:
>
> > > Does anyone ha
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Justin Mason
> Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 9:34 AM
> To: DEFFONTAINES Vincent
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Bounce spam to bayes classifier with Outlook
>
>
>
> DEFFONTAINES Vin
I just upgraded to 2.50 to test out the new features...
My supervise script that has always started SA in the past now breaks.
[root@mailgw spamd]# cat run
#!/bin/bash
exec /usr/bin/spamd -x -q
I've tried it without params, with just -x, with -d etc... nothing works. The spamd
gets a PID, an
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Brian
> May
> Sent: Friday, February 07, 2003 2:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Bayes binding...
>
>
> when I start the latest CVS tar.gz file.. it binds to the bayes files
> first
the documentation for whitelist_from_rcvd doesnt make sense to me.
"Use this to supplement the whitelist_from addresses with a check against the Received
headers. The first parameter is the address to whitelist, and the second is a domain
to match in the Received headers. This does not allow glo
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Alan
> John Moore
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 8:07 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Spam got through generating a negative score
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I received the following message y
Is it possible to manually add spamphrases? I tried adding some to a local file in
/etc/mail/spamassassin, but they never seem to take after restarting spamd. Can
someone explain how the number you assign the spam phrase reflects the scoring?
Thanks
--
something I heard last night.. this just re-affirms it today.
http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/030106/sfm029_1.html
if it's old news, my mistake :)
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Theo
> Van Dinter
> Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 3:26 PM
> To: Ross Vandegrift
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Mail routing with SA
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 03:55:44PM -05
> -Original Message-
> From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2002 11:13 AM
> To: Dallas Engelken; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] How to test whitelist_from_rcvd?
>
>
> Well, if you want to test a specific whitel
Can anyone give me a recommendation on how I can test a whitelist_from_rcvd rule?
Thx
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:
With Great Power, Comes Great Responsibility
Learn to use your power at OSDN's High Performance Computing Channel
http:/
> -Original Message-
> From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 3:16 PM
> To: McClung, Darren W.
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: OT: No [SATalk] tag? (was: sql support)
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 02:57:03PM -0600, McClung, Darren W. wr
> -Original Message-
> From: McClung, Darren W. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 2:57 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: OT: No [SATalk] tag? (was: sql support)
>
>
> Why wasn't this message tagged with [SATalk], and, therefore,
> didn't get
> filtered?
>
when using the -q flag, are there any options besides the ones listed
below that you can use? or is there plans to added additional support?
* whitelist_from
* blacklist_from
* required_hits
* rewrite_subject
* report_header
* defang_mime
* terse_report
like ?
whitelist_from_rcvd
unwhitelist_fro
> If not I was thinking of beginning to write my own,
> which leads me to this question Has anyone here
> used perl to verify md5 passwords? That probably
> belongs elsewhere but it's worth a shot.
>
> --
> Chris
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
i have already done this authentication scheme, for
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremy Turner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:11 AM
> To: Dev
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Only allow so many emails
>
>
> On Fri, 2002-11-22 at 15:39, Dev wrote:
> > Is there a way to set a limit on how many
> I've come across a pretty serious problem, but I'm not sure if SA or
> qmail-scanner is to blame. The problem is that messages
> (incorrectly) tagged
> as spam gets their MIME headers broken somehow. The end
> result is that the
> MIME stuff as well as the encoded attachments show up as
> re
> Hi everyone. I work for a small ISP, and we've just installed
> SpamAssassin on our front-end mail server. It's doing a LOT
> better than
> our previous procmail filtering -- my compliments and endless
> admiration
> to the authors!
>
> Currently we're catching nearly 2000 messages per hour,
Andrew Brooker wrote:
I am running a sitewide config of SpamAssassin with Sendmail +
MIMEDefang.
I was wondering if it's possible to use a SQL database with this
configuration?
I was hoping to be able to pass the e-mail address to the SQL database,
if the user's e-mail address is not in the d
Andrew Brooker wrote:
Hiya All,
I am running a sitewide config of SpamAssassin with Sendmail + MIMEDefang.
I was wondering if it's possible to use a SQL database with this
configuration?
I was hoping to be able to pass the e-mail address to the SQL database,
if the user's e-mail address is not in
>
> Bryant, Eric D. said the following on 19/10/02 21:01:
>
> > 4. How well does it perform at large sites? (We process around
> > 5-700,000 emails a day)
>
> We do about 10 million a day, but then we have over 400 mail servers.
> SpamAssassin can seriously overload a box, so be very careful.
Ullrich Groh wrote:
Hy there,
I just installed (for the first time) SA 2.43 on our AIX 4.3 mail-server.
Perl is 5.005_03.
The SA itself seems to be running very good.
What makes a problem is spamd/spamc.
In principle it is up and running: but only for E-Mail smaller than
approx. 250 kB. Anyt
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 05:35:20AM +0200,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > hi list
> >
> > however, once the mails received go higher than 50 at one time, the
> > CPU load shoots up to 90% or higher. and when this happens the mail
> > server becomes very slow and sometimes users complain that t
>
> On 08 Oct 2002 13:01:34 -0500, you wrote:
>
> >Would anyone be interested in a script that pipes spamd data
> into mrtg
> >to be graphed?
>
>
> Yes. I already graph inbound and outbound mail to MRTG. A
> spam one would be
> nice, too.
>
>
i do this already via qmail-scanner-queue.pl
> I'm using spamd in daemon mode with vpopmail: daemon spamd -d -v -u
> vpopmail -F 0
> What's the exact sintax forcing to read one configuration and
> not in the
> vpopmail users own maildir ?
> I must rise score from 5 to 7 and I don't know how.
>
-x flag will disable per-user configs.
---
> I know people have accomplished this previously. Is there a general
> consensus as to what is the best way to configure such a setup?
>
>
Install qmail with QMAILQUEUE patch, qmail-scanner, and spamassassin.
Add smtproutes to forward mail from your domain into your internal mail server. My
> Dallas Engelken wrote:
> > http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/
> > Are you guys fucking serious!!
> >
> > That's blocking over 250,000 hosts!!! The entire SBIS netblock.
> > 64.216.0.0 - 64.219.255.255
>
> This has nothing to do with SpamAssassin. I'
http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/
Are you guys fucking serious!!
That's blocking over 250,000 hosts!!! The entire SBIS netblock.
64.216.0.0 - 64.219.255.255
There can never be justification for blocking the entire netblock that is that large.
Dallas
---
> I use
>
> exec /usr/bin/spamd -q -x -D -L -u vpopmail 2>&1 |
> /usr/local/bin/multilog t
> s100 /var/log/spamd
>
Are you able to send
# svc -d /service/spamd
and shut down the daemon? when I try, it is still bound to port 783. I have to send
a TERM to it to after svc -d. svc -u sta
> -Original Message-
> From: Dallas Engelken
> Sent: Wednesday, May 22, 2002 11:36 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Spamd from daemontools
>
>
> Anyone run spamd from daemontools? When I try and
> exec /usr/bin/spamd -d -F0
>
Anyone run spamd from daemontools? When I try and
exec /usr/bin/spamd -d -F0
it forks off, and then I get readproctile erros. When I try and
exec /usr/bin/spamd -F0
everything is peachy, spamd binds to port 783 and all, but spamc cant talk to it.
Check out the following...
--
> Hi
>
> I have been running Spamassassin now for 2 months and are
> extremely happy
> with it. However, I run mail account for family and friend
> and am sick and
> get sick and tired of adding whitelist and blacklist entries for them.
>
> So I though I would run Spamassassin with MySql and
ail is scanned for virus+spam before it is delivered to your
internal mail server.
Good Luck,
Dallas Engelken
Network Consultant / Mail Administrator
Network Management Group, Inc.
http://www.nmgi.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
Have big
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Kohlsmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:52 PM
> To: Dallas Engelken; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] RAV Support
>
>
> > Yes, I know how RAV with qmail works. But I'm trying to
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Kohlsmith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 3:40 PM
> To: Dallas Engelken; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] RAV Support
>
>
> > some debugging problems where viruses that are fo
has anyone tested this in 1.12? it seems very very buggy to me. global variable name
doesnt not match what is in rav_scanner function. scanner array name is rav, while
function name is rav_scanner (hence it is not called).
some debugging problems where viruses that are found do not get logge
- Original Message -
From: "CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 4. Here is a sample .mailfilter file:
Refer to my post about adding exit calls to keep messages from deferring.
> to turn it on/off. Of course this approach requires a perl script that
> users can use to m
t
}
## OR IF YOU WANT TO DELIVER SPAM TO THE USERS MAILDIR
#exception {
#to "$VPOP"
# exit
#}
}
else
{
exception {
include $VHOME/Maildir/.mailfilter
}
> Hello list... How can I use SpamAssassin with
> .qmail-default file and vpopmail without
> qmail-scanner.
It would be to your advantage to read the archives.
Refer to my 2 posts from 03/29/02
http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/11679/2002/3/50/8247915/
http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/116
> Sounds similar to what I'm doing for our company. I'm using
> Exim and Cyrus
> IMAP. Our main internet SMTP server checks all incoming mail
> with SA, then
> the mail is sent on to the IMAP servers where mail that was
> flagged as spam
> is delivered to an IMAP folder called "_spam_". The use
> -Original Message-
> From: CertaintyTech - Ed Henderson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 2:42 PM
> To: Dallas Engelken; 'Gawain'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Maildrop/vpopmail with Spamassassin
>
>
> So what yo
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Gawain
> Sent: Friday, March 29, 2002 12:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Maildrop/vpopmail with Spamassassin
>
>
> I've just configured Spamassassin on a Yellow Dog Linux machine and
> I've got SpamAssassin working pretty well with MailScanner and Vipul's
> Razor, but I can't get any reports to appear in spam. All I get in the
> header is:
> [snip]
>
> But this gave me nothing. So I added:
> report_header 1
>
are you running SpamAssassin 2.0 or higher?
have you checked your
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Søren
> Boll Overgaard
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 3:27 PM
> To: Nick Mitchell
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Deleting Scored Spam
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 04:10:57PM -0500
D number
I'm wondering if the difference is because of linefeeds vs carriage
returns, and is there anyway to fix it?
Thanks,
Dallas Engelken
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
> I was just debugging some (non-spamassassin related) mail problems so I
> sent a message from a hotmail account to my real mail address. It was
> tagged with FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD even though it was sent from hotmail.
> This is with the Spamassassin in Debian unstable.
FYI
This has been covered
root has nothing to do with what user is
binding. Also, spamc cannot increase it's permission level to root if ran
by qmailq unless it was SETUID which it is not.
I'll tell you 100% that -u root is NOT the correct fix....
Dallas
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dallas E
> Well for the record, just adding "-u root" into the line in the scanner
> script that calls spamc fixed the problem. Qmailq couldn't bind to ports.
> It's odd because it should bind to the port while still running as root
and
> only change to qmailq after that point (at least that's how the cod
> DE> # QMAILQUEUE="/var/qmail/bin/qmail-scanner-queue.pl"
> DE> # export QMAILQUEUE
> DE> # echo -e "To: postmaster@localhost\nSubject: This is a QMAILQUEUE
test\n\n"
> DE> | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
>
> DE> After you run that, check your postmaster account and there should be
a
> DE> message
> How can I be sure that my SpamAssassin works ?
>
> I've installed Qmail-scanner 1.10 and it detects my spamd... But after
> ?
Check your email headers for the X-Spam-Flag header.
If you dont see it, make sure you have set QMAILQUEUE enviroment variable
when you invoke qmail-smtpd.
# QMAILQUEUE
> > First of all, I run SA2.1.. here is my log output.
>
> Is 2.1 ready for production environments?
>
>From my numbers, it has been more acurate than 2.01. I run it on two low
priority production servers. Have had no problems.
Dallas
___
Spamassas
of my
servers because it just provides smtproutes and does no local delivery.
Hopefully this helps some...
# Dallas Engelken
# Mail Administrator
# Network Management Group, Inc.
# http://www.nmgi.com
# https://mail.hutchnet.com
#
# Sigs are for chicks
> * 0.8 -- Forged hotmail.com 'Received:' header found
>
> This test seems to be plain wrong; If I send a message from hotmail, it
gets
> tagged with this score. Is this a known problem?
Yes, if you check the archives I think I mentioned it a couple weeks ago,
then someone else brought it up ag
> I just sent a blank email to myself from my Hotmail account and it
actually
> scored on SA:
I brought this up last week.
> Anyone have any ideas on why SA thinks this email contains forged Hotmail
> Received: ?
> Using SA v.2.01
Hotmail changed their mail headers. again. I would
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 10:38:12AM -0500, Chin, Nelson wrote:
> > I currently have a qmail+qmailscanner+sophos antivirus setup on redhat.
How
> > do I integrate spamassassin? Their website doesn't have any docs with
that
> > combination.
>
> it's pretty easy: use this patch for spamassassin, and
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Geier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[sa-talk] mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 11:42 AM
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] question regarding report-template and HTML email
> ok... I got this response twice...
>
> I had the report in th
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Geier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[sa-talk] mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 11:02 AM
Subject: [SAtalk] question regarding report-template and HTML email
> current setup:
> report_header 0
> terse_report 0
>
use
report_h
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bob Proulx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I am using spamassassin site wide with qmail-scanner. I was wondering
if it
> > is possible to defer the mail, instead of delivering or bouncing the
mail?
> > Does anyone do this? Is it recommended?
>
> If you deferred i
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> > there are several domain in 60_whitelist by default in 2.1. why would
it
> > not be checked by spamd?
>
> works for me (tm) ;) Are you sure your config files are sane and
> installed?
>
> --j.
This Works:
echo "From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" | spamc
This Doesnt Work:
66 matches
Mail list logo
