> -----Original Message----- > From: Tony Earnshaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 3:34 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] RE: Outlook FN --> sa-learn-spam > > > tor, 2003-02-13 kl. 23:36 skrev Dallas Engelken: > > > Check this example... > > > > Take an email... cat it through spamc to see what bayes > scores it. Send it into your learning system as spam. cat > it through spamc again to see what bayes thinks now....... > > SA>2.50-CVS from mid January last. > > I have an example porn mail, which spamd/spamc didn't originally > recognize as porn, scored 3.5. > > I had a couple from the same site, found I didn't want it in > future, and > added the necessary rules to /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf. > I test it > for a uri component and for word content - two separate rules.. > > Testing it with spamassassin -t < porn.txt now scores 12.9, > fine by me. > Testing it with 'cat porn.text | spamc' still gives 3.5. Even running > spamc as the spamd user. > > Why would this be?
did you restart the spamd daemon to reread the configs? if so, there is no reason why they shouldnt score them the same. dallas ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your SSL security issues. http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk