> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tony Earnshaw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 3:34 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] RE: Outlook FN --> sa-learn-spam
> 
> 
> tor, 2003-02-13 kl. 23:36 skrev Dallas Engelken:
> 
> > Check this example...
> > 
> > Take an email... cat it through spamc to see what bayes 
> scores it.  Send it into your learning system as spam.  cat 
> it through spamc again to see what bayes thinks now.......
> 
> SA>2.50-CVS from mid January last.
> 
> I have an example porn mail, which spamd/spamc didn't originally
> recognize as porn, scored 3.5.
> 
> I had a couple from the same site, found I didn't want it in 
> future, and
> added the necessary rules to /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf. 
> I test it
> for a uri component and for word content - two separate rules..
> 
> Testing it with spamassassin -t < porn.txt now scores 12.9, 
> fine by me.
> Testing it with 'cat porn.text | spamc' still gives 3.5. Even running
> spamc as the spamd user.
> 
> Why would this be?

did you restart the spamd daemon to reread the configs?  if so, there is no reason why 
they shouldnt score them the same.
dallas
 


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE  SSL Guide from Thawte
are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here to get a FREE
Thawte SSL guide and find the answers to all your  SSL security issues.
http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?thaw0026en
_______________________________________________
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk

Reply via email to