Fri, 2004-01-30 at 13:33, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 01:32:11PM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> > hmm that is wierd b/c i learned about 500 a nite or so for the last 3 to
> > 4 weeks...
>
> were these mails recently sent or old mails that you're lea
hmm that is wierd b/c i learned about 500 a nite or so for the last 3 to
4 weeks...
sigh.. does this mean corruption in the DB ?
adam
On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 13:21, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 12:27:53PM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> > debug: bayes: expiry check
1:04, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2004 at 09:18:45AM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> > Thanks Theo i will try that. Any idea why these tokens wont expire
> > though? I learn a lot of spam each day and still nothing and my DB just
> > keeps getting bigger and bigg
Thanks Theo i will try that. Any idea why these tokens wont expire
though? I learn a lot of spam each day and still nothing and my DB just
keeps getting bigger and bigger.
adam
On Thu, 2004-01-29 at 23:33, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 09:55:06AM -0500, Adam Denenberg wr
Hey,
i have a _very_ large bayes DB with about 2million tokens. I dont want
to lose all my token data but for some reason bayes wont expire. I keep
getting the following error.
synced Bayes databases from journal in 88 seconds: 52849 unique entries
(83822 total entries)
debug: bayes: expiry ch
is this list working today?
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration
See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA.
http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn
Hello,
i am getting the following bayes error when trying to do a
force-expire. Is there any way around this so i can expire my old
tokens?
debug: bayes: found bayes db version 2
synced Bayes databases from journal in 0 seconds: 569 unique entries
(569 total entries)
debug: bayes: expiry chec
sorry i missed this in 20_dnsbl_tests.cf
header RCVD_IN_NJABL_DIALUP eval:check_rbl('njabl-notfirsthop',
'dnsbl.njabl.org.', '127.0.0.3')
describe RCVD_IN_NJABL_DIALUP NJABL: dialup sender did non-local SMTP
tflags RCVD_IN_NJABL_DIALUP net
On Tue, 2003-
i found this
http://www.dnsbl.njabl.org/use.html
but also note this comment
Our dnsbl can also be used to tag potential spam messages (letting
individual users decide what action to take) using Spamassassin. After
you have Spamassassin properly installed, add the following to your
local.cf, p
supplement to help SA be even better at
what it already does so well.
adam
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 09:46, Fred wrote:
> Adam Denenberg wrote:
> > SA List,
> >
> > What i want to start is a Bayes Corpus Project. I would like to be
> > able to allow people to submit confirmed
SA List,
I am writing for feedback about a new project i would like to start
and would love feedback/help from the excellent community that has been
built here on the SA lists.
What i want to start is a Bayes Corpus Project. I would like to be
able to allow people to submit confirmed ham and
in the same directory as the bayes DB files.
adam
- Original Message -
From: "AthlonRob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 10:17 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] sa-learn ... R/W: tie failed!
> On Wed, 2003-12-
ok that clears it up, sorry for the confusion. I misinterpreted your
explanation. I am clear on how this operates now.
thanks
adam
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 14:37, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 02:18 PM 12/4/2003, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> >i thought bayes knew if a message was whitelisted or bl
every blacklisted
gets learned as spam, which is a very bad thing.
Am i confused?
adam
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 13:56, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 12:53 PM 12/4/2003, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> >cant you just whitelist the sa-talk mailing lists since i believe Bayes
> >does not learn
cant you just whitelist the sa-talk mailing lists since i believe Bayes
does not learn from whitelists, correct?
adam
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 11:21, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 11:06 AM 12/4/2003, Smart,Dan wrote:
> >In reading the sa-learn man file, it says running discussions of spam
> >through sa-l
check your network tests and see if one of them is failing. Running
spamd -D should tell you if an RBL timed out or not. The default RBL
timeout is 15 seconds i believe so that could be a culprit.
adam
On Thu, 2003-12-04 at 09:25, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> We just set up a new mail server runn
how agressive are these rules? I am hearing great things about them but
dont want to produce FP's on my production system.
Any feedback?
thanks
adam
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 11:42, Chris Santerre wrote:
> latest is 1.52. Fixed 2 typos and 3 domains. An SF
> project..Hm... :)
>
> > ---
>
> In your question, I don't know "allow_user_rules 1" should help you or not.
> It doesn't make sense if the rules should be in local.cf file.
>
>
> Best Regards
> Patrick Tsang
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Adam D
get analyzed.
anyone have similar issues?
thanks
adam
On Nov 26, 2003, at 3:31 PM, Terry Milnes wrote:
What do you mean by "user rules"? if you mean user preferences I
have preferences in mysql that are not in the local.cf and they do
work.
Terry
Adam Denenberg wrote:
I beli
I believe Dallas touched on this some time ago when 2.55 was released
but not sure of the status. It appears still that in order to have user
rules work in a mysql database, they need to exist in the local.cf file
still. I have been testing this all day and the only time i can get it
to work was w
Hello,
I am getting the following errors when running an "sa-learn -D
--rebuild" on a 2.6 installation on solaris 2.9. not sure what the
errors means, but i cant seem to expire my tokens. Any ideas?
thanks
adam
synced Bayes databases from journal in 1 seconds: 795 unique entries
(1115 total e
so basically if i do report_safe > 0, and the message is text/plain and
found to be spam, there is no way of keeping the message in tact without
attachment?
adam
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 10:38, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2003 at 09:17:46AM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> >
Hello,
I am having an issue with the behavior of report_safe 2. I would only
like "unsafe" emails to be attached if spam is detected (non text/plain
MIME type). However it seems that report_safe 2 attaches _ALL_ spam
emails, and then in addition to the spam report, creates an
unsafe_report if t
99.6)
by nymx1.domain.com with SMTP; 26 Nov 2003 14:18:50 -
Received: (qmail 9062 invoked by uid 0); 26 Nov 2003 14:19:07 -
Date: 26 Nov 2003 14:19:07 -
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: test
test
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at
Hello,
I am trying to enable only 2 RBLs (SBL
and DNSBL) however they dont seem to want to get enabled. I added the
following debug code to PerMsgStatus.pm to see whats going on but get the
following results
code
--
in fun
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 09:47, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 09:06:28AM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> > shouldnt the original from be preserved up top?
>
> If there was a from in the original, it should be in the encapsulated
> message. Feel free to open a bu
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 09:47, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 09:06:28AM -0500, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> > shouldnt the original from be preserved up top?
>
> If there was a from in the original, it should be in the encapsulated
> message. Feel free to open a bu
d to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or block
similar future email. If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.
shouldnt the original from be preserved up top?
adam
On Nov 24, 2003, at 11:18 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003
well i would think it at least preserves the From field no? The from
field seems to be getting whacked whenever there is a spam message with
report_safe 2
am i missing something?
On Nov 24, 2003, at 11:06 PM, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 10:19:31PM -0500, Adam Denenberg
hey
dont appear in the message header.
any ideas?
thanks
adam
On Nov 24, 2003, at 9:48 PM, Adam Denenberg wrote:
Hey,
I have 2.55 and 2.60 running. I would like to use report_safe 2, to
attach any "mime dangerous" spam messages. This seems to work in
2.55, however in 2.6, every
Hey,
I have 2.55 and 2.60 running. I would like to use report_safe 2, to
attach any "mime dangerous" spam messages. This seems to work in 2.55,
however in 2.6, every spam message appears to be getting attached as an
attachment with the message saying "Spam software has detected".
Shoul
How do i check verbosely which RBLs are gettting called? I have the
following in my local.cf file, however the -D output shows 11 RBL's
getting queried. can someone advise whats going on here?
thanks
-D output
--
@40003fc27bed0f8bddb4 debug: RBL: success for 10 of 11 queries
@400
:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
> Adam Denenberg writes:
> >Hey,
> >
> > How are people handling the locking issues with Bayes over NFS on a
> >high traffic mail server? Currently i have "bayes_learn_to_journal 1
> >" turned on,
Hey,
How are people handling the locking issues with Bayes over NFS on a
high traffic mail server? Currently i have "bayes_learn_to_journal 1
" turned on, but an sa-learn --rebuild seems to be taking quite some
time (i have about a million tokens in my DB).
Has anyone had a better success rate
Hello,
I am trying to confirm that RBLs are working. I have the following in
my local.cf but with debug output on (output below) nothing about RBLs
are noted. How do i confirm the RBLs i want are working properly?
thanks
adam
from local.cf
-
### RBL Checks
skip_rbl_checks 0
r
I am trying to run a force-expire and getting the following es when
running with -D in sa-learn version 2.60 (perl 5.8 solaris 9)
I get these non-stop until I Ctrl-D out of it...
Use of uninitialized value in numeric gt (>) at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/UnixLocker.
Has anybody got user rules working in Mysql? I remember a while back
there was an issue that the rule had to be defined in local.cf first
before defining it on a per user level in mysql. I would like users to
be able to define scores for a few certain rules thru a GUI that talks
to the mysql DB, b
Thiago,
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2553
adam
On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 11:22, Thiago Lima wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm seeing to many messages marked as spam and there're not.
> Looking further I found that all messages came from users using
> Outlook 2003 (office X
try using GNU Patch instead of the one with solaris, i get this all the
time. It will fix your problems.
adam
On Wednesday, October 8, 2003, at 06:47 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Under Solaris 8, applying the Razor2.patch to fix the taint problem
Dies
horribly:
I cd to: /usr/local/lib/perl5
anybody sharing bayes over NFS, with any issues? I thought i read
somewhere that somebody was sharing bayes over NFS with a netapp filer
with no probs.
anybody want to put in their $.02 to bayes over NFS.
I am running 2.6 FYI.
thanks
adam
-
under X-Spam-Level: i only see 6 stars, which means the number was
probably 6.99 something, and got rounded to 7 in the email, but didnt
actually hit the required 7.0
adam
On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 09:01, Jeffrey Wheat wrote:
> I am seeing problems with 2.60 on a FreeBSD
> server, using exim as my mt
kind of a repost of my previous question. But i dont see any use of
check_for_sender_no_reverse that shows up in EvalTest.pm. Can i use
this and apply my own score to it? Why is there no score associated
with this test?
thanks
adam
---
Th
Does anybody have any comments or feedback on using SA with perl 5.8 on
solaris 9 running 64 bit? Or maybe 2.8 running perl 64 bit?
Just seeing if anybody has any issues running perl in 64 bit mode on
solaris.
thanks
adam
---
This sf.net
i posted this earlier but it didnt show up in the list, wierd..
A repost of my previous question. But i dont see any use of
check_for_sender_no_reverse that shows up in EvalTest.pm. Can i use
this and apply my own score to it? Why is there no score associated
with this test?
thanks
adam
--
I am trying to implement a rule to check for no reverse DNS of the
sender ip (similar to the -p flag of tcpserver).
I notice these in EvalTests.pm, especially in function
check_received_helos
my $no_rdns = $rcvd->{no_reverse_dns}.
However i am having trouble tracking down where that is actuall
the docs say bayes_expiry_max_db_size but the Conf.pm says
bayes_expiry_min_db_size, just a heads up.
anyway, i would like to keep a good amount of my learned spam/ham.
What is a good number to set this too if i want to keep say 10,000 spams
/ hams in the DB ? I dont want to adjust this until
Is there a way to specify which RBL SA should check? I dont want to
just turn the score to 0 for an RBL check, i want to save the time used
to even check certain RBLS. I only want to call 3 specific ones, is this
possible?
thanks
adam
---
T
Dinter wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 03:02:39PM -0400, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> > the docs say bayes_expiry_max_db_size but the Conf.pm says
> > bayes_expiry_min_db_size, just a heads up.
>
> Which docs and which version are you using? max is 2.60, min is 2.5x.
>
> >
that path came from the homedir of vpopmail, which in your case is
/usr/local/vpopmail. Make sure you set your bayes_* options properly
in your local.cf that effect all users. You can also try setting
bayes_path per user in the mysql table which should help.
the problem also probably lies
) just as long as it was able to retreive them. Why does the
finish_parsing() affect sql and not flat file user configs only ?
adam
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 09:11, Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sen
however get "Checking priveleged commands in user config".
does this mean i can not use the user rules in my sql config? What is
preventing me from doing so?
I run spamd as /usr/bin/spamd -a -d -x -q -u nobody
any ideas?
thanks
adam
On Monday, July 28, 2003, at 07:50 PM, Adam Denenb
ED] | score ADAM_TEST| 100 |
333 | NULL |
+++-
++---+
On Monday, July 28, 2003, at 06:03 PM, Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 4:10 PM
To: Dallas L. Engelken
Cc:
.
adam
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 15:38, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> cool. Does that mean that we could define "header" and "describe"
> paramters in the DB as well ?
>
> as well in the tables for each user or domain?
>
> thanks
> adam
>
> On Mon
cool. Does that mean that we could define "header" and "describe"
paramters in the DB as well ?
as well in the tables for each user or domain?
thanks
adam
On Mon, 2003-07-28 at 14:41, Dallas L. Engelken wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Adam De
lken wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Adam Denenberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, July 28, 2003 10:44 AM
> > To: SA-Talk
> > Subject: [SAtalk] custom rules with mysql
> >
> >
> > Hey guys,
> >
> > I am usi
Hey guys,
I am using SA 2.55 with mysql user prefs.
Does anybody know if its possible to use per-domain/user rules using
mysql?
thanks
adam
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-com
we use db prefs for SA (2.55) so all user prefs are not in flat files,
but are in mysql.
Is it possible to somehow use mysql to store per-user symbolic tests?
thanks
adam
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites inc
(5.8/3) -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]|ip=63.108
not sure exactly how to interpret those numbers though...
adam
On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 17:06, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> hmm.. when piping the mail thru spamassassin -tD it yields
>
> debug: is spam? score=-4.2 required=5 tests=BAYES_01,H
, 2003-07-23 at 16:41, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 03:47 PM 7/23/2003 -0400, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> >nevermind i found it, thanks.
> >
> > SO report_safe 2 will mark _ALL_ html mail as spam ?
>
> Sigh. Where'd you get that idea? I never said, or even remotely implied
s
possible ?
thanks
adam
On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 15:32, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> sorry, what is the GTUBE string exactly ?
>
> adam
>
> On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 14:04, Matt Kettler wrote:
> > At 12:06 PM 7/23/2003 -0400, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> > >Is there any
sorry, what is the GTUBE string exactly ?
adam
On Wed, 2003-07-23 at 14:04, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 12:06 PM 7/23/2003 -0400, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> >Is there any way to test the results of report_safe 2?
> >
> >thanks
> >adam
>
> Send yourself an HTML-only me
Is there any way to test the results of report_safe 2?
thanks
adam
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including
Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now.
Download today and enter to win an
well i am actually trying to *enable* defanging, but i dont want the SA
report along with the defanging. thats what i am trying to figure out.
How to defang html email without SA dropping a report in the email.
adam
On Fri, 2003-07-18 at 13:53, James Miller wrote:
> I'm having a similar proble
Sorry for the repost, but trying to get this all figured out. Now that
i know defang_mime has evolved into "report_safe 2", does anybody know
how to get the defang capabilities without SA actaully putting a report
in the email?
thanks in advance
adam
-
fang_mime in 2.55
> Hi,
>
> On 16 Jul 2003 11:08:57 -0400 Adam Denenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > is defang_mime still an option in 2.55 ? Can it be placed in sql table
> > for user prefs?
> >
> > I am getting the following error in 2.55
> >
would i be correct in saying report_safe 2 does what i remember
defang_mime to do? (strips out html and converts email to text).
I dont want any extra reports added to the email .
thanks
adam
On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 11:59, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 11:08:57AM -0400, A
is defang_mime still an option in 2.55 ? Can it be placed in sql table
for user prefs?
I am getting the following error in 2.55
: debug: retrieving prefs for [EMAIL PROTECTED] from SQL server
Jul 16 10:41:06 somehost spamd[18395]: debug: Failed to parse line in
SpamAssassin configuration, ski
Is it possible to specify the path to look for Razor2's home in Spam
Assassin? I dont want to use /root/.razor or anything else it defaults
to.
thanks
adam
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple oper
400, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > I know this has been discussed on the list before, since many people
> > run multiple gateways running SA, they have no way to sync their bayes
> > DBs. Bayes does not work over NFS due to flock(), thus forcing
> > inde
All,
I know this has been discussed on the list before, since many people
run multiple gateways running SA, they have no way to sync their bayes
DBs. Bayes does not work over NFS due to flock(), thus forcing
independant Bayes DB.
So on the list we mostly come to the conclusion that the only
try all_spam_to in the local.cf file
adam
On Thu, 2003-06-12 at 12:12, Sean Patronis wrote:
> I have a server wide SA setup working correctly, and am currently just
> "tagging" the subject of the detected spam. I also have one user who
> demands that none of his email's subjects be altered in a
Do you guys recommend batch learning bayes or piping thru sa-learn for
each mail that comes through. Right now if mail gets tagged as
X-Spam-Status in procmcail we pipe it to sa-learn --single --spam
otherwise we pipe it through sa-learn --single --ham. So every message
goes thru sa-learn before
i use this
#!/bin/sh
PATH=/var/qmail/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin
export PATH
case "$1" in
start)
echo "Starting Spamassassin"
/usr/bin/spamd -a -d -L -x
;;
stop)
echo "Stopping Spamassassin..."
PID=`ps -auwx | grep spamd | grep -v grep | awk '{prin
How do you prevent sa-learn from creating user_prefs file? I get this
error constantly in my procmail.log file where i run sa-learn on all
tagged spam
Failed to create default user preference file
/usr/home/spamuser/.spamassassin/user_prefs
i am running SA 2.55 with -x option FYI.
any ideas?
hmm.. looks like i need --single..
--single is not in the docs, but sneaks its way into the top of the -h
output..
adam
On Tuesday, June 3, 2003, at 09:54 PM, Adam Denenberg wrote:
i have the following test in my procmailrc.. Doesnt seem that
sa-learn is working properly under 2.54
i have the following test in my procmailrc.. Doesnt seem that sa-learn
is working properly under 2.54.
here is my procmail excerpt
:0
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
{
:0c: bayes-spam.lock
| /usr/bin/sa-learn --spam --local > /tmp/spamout 2>&1
:0:
./spamuser/Maildir/
}
#more /tmp/spamout
Failed
i usually see this error on solaris. Make sure you are using GNU Patch
..
adam
On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 15:34, Thomas Cameron wrote:
> All -
>
> I applied this patch but I got this:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] spamass-milter-0.1.3a]# patch -p0 < ../patch
> patching file spamass-milter.cpp
> Hunk #3 FA
Can one do body content filtering with custom SA rules? How about
custom subject filtering?
thanks
adam
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay
Get office equipment for less on eBay!
http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
___
the easiest way I know if is using formail thru procmail
:0fhw
| formail "-I X-Smap-Checker-Version"
I actually do this also to b/c its annoying..
adam
On Saturday, May 31, 2003, at 02:44 AM, Robin Mordasiewicz wrote:
how do you prevent the X-Spam-Checker-Version header from being
generated
Does spamassassin check the mail against Razor's Database or just
optionally contribute the mail it finds as SPAM to cloudmarks DB?
thanks
adam
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay
Get office equipment for less on eBay!
http://adfarm.
Since modifying the code to handle storing Bayes in MySql seems like a
more long term project, is there any immediate way to support sharing
the Bayes DB over NFS with proper file locking ?
adam
On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 12:12, Joe Breu wrote:
> > > Just a thought, why not run SA on the delivery hos
Alexander,
This seems to be a newly formed hot topic. I recently posted the
question about how to share the Bayes DB across multiple equal cost MX
machines and the only real way is to put the Bayes DB in the database.
However there is no code in place currently to do that. The Bayes.pm
file ne
hey,
i am noticing some wierd behavior with 2.54 on redhat 8 under
qmail-1.03. when i run spamd as
spamd -x -L -D -d -u vpopmail
--virtual-config-dir=/home/vpopmail/domains/%d
spamd does not seem to use the prefs in
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf. It was my understanding that spamd
would
83 matches
Mail list logo
