Since modifying the code to handle storing Bayes in MySql seems like a more long term project, is there any immediate way to support sharing the Bayes DB over NFS with proper file locking ?
adam On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 12:12, Joe Breu wrote: > > > Just a thought, why not run SA on the delivery host instead of the MX > > > hosts? (I'm assume that both of your MX servers must forward the mail to a > > > central server.) > > > Your suggestion is the exact opposite of the intended function. The idea > > is to run two relays to share the load, or run as primary/secondary (MX), > > filter via SA, then deliver to the main mail server. You are proposing to > > dump the work back onto an already-overloaded main server, and remove the > > two "helpers" doing the filtering. Doesn't make sense to me. YMMV. --Alan > > And in my case, completely impratical. We use a cluster of machines to > handle mail. 2 mail exchangers and 2 customer smtp/pop3/imap servers. > All 4 machines have access to the same mail spool using maildir (no > locking problem there). We do filtering on all machines (all scan for > infections and spam). > > A central bayes DB is the best solution. All machines benefit from the > ham and spam learned from other machines. > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
