> From: Chris A
> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 9:35 PM
>
> Is there a way to get a report or log of the test
> results hits that spamassasin finds. The idea is I
> want to better fine tune the values assigned to cretin
> tests. However it is hard to narrow down just which
> test are getting hi
Jens, Thanks for this handy piece of code.
Jens Madsen wrote:
Hack away,
--
cat Report_spam.pl
#!/usr/bin/perl -w
#-***
Is there a way to get a report or log of the test
results hits that spamassasin finds. The idea is I
want to better fine tune the values assigned to cretin
tests. However it is hard to narrow down just which
test are getting hits. Right now I have to look at
each of the emails SA headers and try to
Okay, now I've had a couple of hours off and I can see straight again. I am sure that
I am making this way harder than it seems however, I am not sure where I went wrong.
First of all I am running RedHat 7.3 with Postfix 2.0.16. (postfix by itself runs
great and passes all the traffic I can th
I just got a dcc client up and running over the weekend -- enjoyed a
similar process. The doc definitely leaves something to be desired.
I'm looking forward to bringing up a server, now. ;)
Tried adding the header you suggested, but I get nothing. No errors
from spamassassin --lint, either..
Folks,
I have a large whitelist (380M) and this code is death when remove_entry
is called:
if ($addr =~ /^(.*)\|ip=cmd$/) {
# it doesn't have an IP attached.
# try to delete any per-IP entries for this addr as well.
# could be slow...
my $mailaddr = $1;
my @keys = grep { /^\
-Original Message-
Yep, it got me this time around too! The test ran very fast, but in actual
operation I'm running around 10 secs per message.
Does anyone know the string to create a virtual ram drive using FreeBSD? I'm
Just my $0.02 on tmpfs... I stopped using them years ago because th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --- Forwarded Message
Date:Tue, 16 Dec 2003 20:37:32 -0500
From:Yakov Shafranovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ASRG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [Asrg] 0. General - SpamAssasin deployed on IETF servers
As of Monday, 12/15, IETF has de
I think its pretty much the same for all nix's if it is supported (check
google).
I have the following line in my fstab:
tmpfs /var/spool/filter tmpfs size=100M 0 0
Alan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Network
Admin
Sent: 15 December
Very easy to do what you describe using procmail. If I were
setting up something like this (which I would not do for love
or for money) I'd use the vacation program to actually send
the messages, avoiding getting trapped in most kinds of mail
loops.
The reasons I would never in a million years
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 12:53:30AM +0200, Emil Samovsky wrote:
> I'm running SA v2.61 on RedHat 5.0 with sendmail and spamass-milter.
> Evrething is working fine.
RH 5.0? Really?
> bayes expire_old_tokens: panic: sv_setpvn called with negative strlen at
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Ma
Hi,
I have for some time used 'spambouncer'
http://www.spambouncer.org/
which despite being useful is I feel not too good at catching spam. I
know spamassasin does a better job. However, spambouncer has one very
useful feature, which is sufficient to prevent me changing to
spamassasin. W
Hack away,
Jens
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of JohnT
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 3:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] daily / weekly reports
hi all,
will shortly be installing SA 2.61.
i'd like to have a report sent to me wi
Yes, I did get it to work.
I used as a basis the HOWTO at
http://sylvestre.ledru.info/howto/howto_qmail_vpopmail.php.
I really only wanted SA, but that HOWTO includes SA and ClamAV, so in
order to get SA working, I had to install ClamAV - funny how that works
sometimes...
Bottom line is that
In the past week or so, I've had a string of spam messages that were flagged
as BAYES_00. At a glance, I haven't been able to see anything obvious that
would have earned that rating, but I don't really want to go through all of
the tokens in the database by hand.
Is there a way to get SA to retu
Hi all,
i am getting these errors
Creating default_prefs
[/tmp/.spamassassin/user_prefs]Dec 1 19:23:31 spamd[26900]:
Cannot write to /tmp/.spamassassin/user_prefs: Permission
denied
Some of the user home directories is /tmp,
should i change this
I am running spamd with -d -c -a
i am using SpamAssassin-2.60
in conjunction with mimedefang 2.37
and sendmail 8.12.10 on solaris 8
SA is detecting spam very well. i tried
to rewrite the subject. i modified
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
rewrite_subject 1
subject_tag spam
report_safe 1
but subject is still
Hello, I've been running SA for about a year on this particular server, and
I've never noticed it until today, but when using the -a flag with -c, SA is
trying to create user preference files for users that don't exist.
I'm using qmail, vpopmail, and SA, and I've got a catchall setup. When
sendin
Hi.
I'm running SA v2.61 on RedHat 5.0 with sendmail and spamass-milter.
Evrething is working fine.
But i have some problem with sa-learn for last couple of weeks.
When trying to run sa-learn i've got:
bayes expire_old_tokens: panic: sv_setpvn called with negative strlen at
/usr/local/lib/perl5
Running spamassassin rather than spamd at the moment.
Enabled with use_pyzor 1 in my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
Alan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MIKE
YRABEDRA
Sent: 16 December 2003 10:47
To: SPAMASSASSIN
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Pyz
Based on the excellent feedback, the latest generation of rule looks like:
full JUSTIFIED_TEXT /(\n.{74}=){4}/
describe JUSTIFIED_TEXT Body uses 74 char wide, justified text
score JUSTIFIED_TEXT2.0
There are a few false positives, so your site may reduce the score as needed.
Of course, wi
Hi,
When I run "spamd -a --vpopmail" I get this message every time an email is
handelend by qmail (in and out):
Use of uninitialized value in string ne at /usr/bin/spamd line 1101,
line 2.
Use of uninitialized value in numeric gt (>) at /usr/bin/spamd line 1123,
line 2.
Use of uninitialized v
Yep, it got me this time around too! The test ran very fast, but in actual
operation I'm running around 10 secs per message.
Does anyone know the string to create a virtual ram drive using FreeBSD? I'm
sure tempted to see if running /var/spool/spamassassin/tmp might help, so I
don't have to g
edit mimedefang-filter in /etc/mail and add the following line to the filter end
section.
action_change_header("Subject", "***SPAM*** $Subject");
The Mimedefang list is also very helpful.
Steve
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of hans mayer
Sent: Tue 12/16/
Could you be a little more specific about what you need and are trying
to accomplish (i.e. relay, local delivery, etc.)?
I assume that since you're using RH, that you're using sendmail and
procmail?
With a little more info, I'd be glad to help if I can.
Rubin
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 18:20, Dan Sp
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 09:06 AM 12/16/03 -0500, Tim B wrote:
this should work. may need a little tweeking.
header RCVD_SECSAGE_RBL eval:check_rbl('SECSAGE',
'blackhole.securitysage.com.')
describe RCVD_SECSAGE_RBL SECSAGE: listed in Security Sage's RBL
score RCVD_SECSAGE_RBL 0.01
tflags RCV
Okay, after 2 days of trying to figure this out I am about to give up. Is
there anyone out there that would mind forwarding me (off list if you wish)
your configuration files? I am looking for local.cf, main.cf, and
master.cf. I would like to run spamassassin in a non-chroot envrioment and
have
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 12:26:04AM +0100, hans mayer wrote:
> i am using SpamAssassin-2.60
> in conjunction with mimedefang 2.37
> and sendmail 8.12.10 on solaris 8
>
> but subject is still the original text
> without the word spam.
>
> any ideas ?
sounds like a mimedefang question.
--
Rando
At 06:26 PM 12/16/2003, hans mayer wrote:
i am using SpamAssassin-2.60
in conjunction with mimedefang 2.37
and sendmail 8.12.10 on solaris 8
SA is detecting spam very well. i tried
to rewrite the subject. i modified
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
rewrite_subject 1
subject_tag spam
repo
i am using SpamAssassin-2.60
in conjunction with mimedefang 2.37
and sendmail 8.12.10 on solaris 8
SA is detecting spam very well. i tried
to rewrite the subject. i modified
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
rewrite_subject 1
subject_tag spam
report_safe 1
but subject is still
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
"Smart,Dan" writes:
>I suggest that instructions to get dccifd running should be included in
>INSTALL...
Dan, any chance you could add a page to the wiki?
http://wiki.SpamAssassin.org/
- --j.
>Compile the dcc as directed in INSTALL doc.
>Get dccpro
Hi,
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, News wrote:
> Does anyone know how to run SpamAssassin in non taint-mode?
You don't want to do that. Read on.
> I'm using Vipul's Razor version 2.36 which won't work with SA 2.61
> running in taint mode (the default). How do you turn it off? I know
> it's a security f
I suggest that instructions to get dccifd running should be included in
INSTALL...
Compile the dcc as directed in INSTALL doc.
Get dccproc running first as described in INSTALL doc.
To use dccifd in Spamassassin fix the dcc_conf and add path settings.
In /var/dcc/dcc_conf:
DCCM_ENABLE=off
DCCM_L
Does anyone know how to run SpamAssassin in non taint-mode? I'm using Vipul's Razor
version 2.36 which won't work with SA 2.61 running in taint mode (the default). How
do you turn it off? I know it's a security feature, but I'd rather have the spam
blocked.
Tim
Fred wrote:
Microsoft announced that Outlook Express 6 is
getting a change in behaviour in the next OS service Pack due out next
year. Starting with SP2, Outlook Express will no longer download
external content (by default). That means a large majority of IMAGE
ONLY SPAMS won't wo
--On Tuesday, December 16, 2003 5:10 PM -0500 Fred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now if only we could get everyone to apply updates when they come out ;)
Or better yet, use REAL clients. :)
Evan
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linu
Microsoft announced that Outlook Express 6 is getting a change
in behaviour in the next OS service Pack due out next year. Starting with
SP2, Outlook Express will no longer download external content (by
default). That means a large majority of IMAGE ONLY SPAMS won't work in
Outlook Express
I think this is related specifically to a postfix bug, not spamassassin. I
run a large postfix farm with 2.0.13 on all nearly all boxes except one
running 2.0.16. That box has been exhibiting the behavior you've described.
At infrequent/random intervals, all mail begins spooling with no delivery
Hello,
Is there any way to include in the information on which whitelist_to/from
or blacklist_from rule hit in Mail::SpamAssassin::PerMsgStatus ->
get_names_of_tests_hit or any other message status method?
Thank you,
Andrew Hoying
---
Thi
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 12:02:54PM -0800, Jean-Francois Guilmard wrote:
> So I wonder if it's clever to install perl 5.8 or I'd better stay on 5.6
> ?
You can use either. I personally prefer 5.6, but SA runs fine on 5.8
as well, you'll just have to deal with the LANG= thing during install.
--
R
I am running Postfix verion 2.0.16 and Spamassassin version 2.61, all
set up according to the Advosys paper at
http://advosys.ca/papers/postfix-filtering.html
Everything will work fine, and then Postfix will simply stop picking
up mail from the maildrop directory. It will accept mail, pass it on
Hi all,
I'm about to start a new installation of Spamassassin on Redhat 7.3
I've read the warning about Perl on spamassassin.org:
Note for Perl 5.8 Users (incl Red Hat 8)
Perl 5
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 02:35:39PM -0500, Covington, Chris wrote:
> Try using amavisd-new instead of spamd:
another option is spampd (notice it's different than spamd). take a
look on google for it. I'm using it for site-wide filtering for the ol'
employer, works great. :)
--
Randomly Generate
Try using amavisd-new instead of spamd:
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/
Here's a how-to:
http://www.geocities.com/scottlhenderson/spamfilter.html
Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dan
Spray
Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 2:17
Hello all,
I just installed SpamAssassin 2.61 on Redhat 7.3 with postfix 2.0.16.
Postfix by itself processes mail just fine. However, as soon as I try to
run the mail through SpamAssassin I start getting the queue backed up. I
had over 7000 messages in the queue before I shut off the filterin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michael Parker writes:
>I'd love to see some sort of more generalized SQL interface that can
>be used by many different "subsystems" can use for their data
>storage. For instance, the hashcash stuff Justin just added. It uses
>a DB_File to store the
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 09:34:11AM -0700, Nels Lindquist wrote:
> Huh. When did that change? The manpage definitely agrees with you,
> but it would seem that "auto_learn 1" is still accepted; no errors
> from --lint and bayes is behaving properly.
I changed the bayes configs to all have "bay
I just posted version 2.01 of bigevil. Lots of fixes thanks to Robert M. and
others. Added ~120 domains that were checked against all my Ham Copra
overnight. Memory increased slightly to just under 1.5 megs more for spamd.
However, take a look in the file. There are 3 rules in the begining called
On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 15:36, Matt Kettler wrote:
> >header RCVD_SECSAGE_RBL eval:check_rbl('SECSAGE',
> >'blackhole.securitysage.com.')
> Check out how check_rbl_from_host works in the RFCI_DSN rule (quoted in my
> other post to this thread).
Perfect, thanks all.
--
The Flying Hamster <[EMAIL
Matt Kettler said:
> That should be self explanatory.. your ok_locales statement is invalid... you've
> got an ok_locales statement, but nothing after it...
>
That's not what I meant but anyway, I did as you suggested and ran it again with no
errors.
Thanks, for your help.
Jason
---
On 16 Dec 2003 at 10:38, Jason Lieurance wrote:
> Matt Kettler said:
> >
> > I'd start off by running spamassassin --lint and fix the errors.
> >
> I ran this and all I got was:
>
> Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping: ok_locales
>
> That didn't tell me much.
The ok_loc
At 10:38 AM 12/16/2003, Jason Lieurance wrote:
Failed to parse line in SpamAssassin configuration, skipping: ok_locales
That didn't tell me much.
That should be self explanatory.. your ok_locales statement is invalid...
you've got an ok_locales statement, but nothing after it...
Remove the line,
On 16 Dec 2003 at 10:29, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 09:30 AM 12/16/03 -0500, Jason Lieurance wrote:
> >Just upgraded to SA 2.61 from SA 2.55 and it appears SA 2.61 is not reading or
> >following the whole local.cf as it should.
>
> I'd start off by running spamassassin --lint and fix the errors.
>
At 07:15 AM 12/16/2003, Marcio Merlone wrote:
Back on-list, wouldn't be useful to make a rule to white-list a message
when sent to abuse@, but only when it has no BCC or tons of rcpts? So,
our abuse@ team could receive spam complains and still not become some
kind of open relay...
It's impossible
At 05:42 AM 12/16/03 -0800, James Nonya wrote:
Dec 16 06:39:54 gateway spamd[9846]: Cannot open bayes
databases /var/empty/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock
failed: File exists
Anyone else see this? Thanks!
lock failures reported by spamd on occasion are somewhat normal.. It
happens when spamd tri
Matt Kettler said:
> At 09:30 AM 12/16/03 -0500, Jason Lieurance wrote:
>>Just upgraded to SA 2.61 from SA 2.55 and it appears SA 2.61 is not reading or
>> following the whole local.cf as it should.
>
> I'd start off by running spamassassin --lint and fix the errors.
>
I ran this and all I got was:
At 09:06 AM 12/16/03 -0500, Tim B wrote:
this should work. may need a little tweeking.
header RCVD_SECSAGE_RBL eval:check_rbl('SECSAGE',
'blackhole.securitysage.com.')
describe RCVD_SECSAGE_RBL SECSAGE: listed in Security Sage's RBL
score RCVD_SECSAGE_RBL 0.01
tflags RCVD_SECSAGE_RBL net
Tim
At 01:36 PM 12/16/03 +, Mark Lowes wrote:
I've had a dig through the archives and wiki for a definitive answer
with no success. Is it currently possible to use DNS based domain
blacklists at the moment in SA? (such as
http://www.securitysage.com/guides/postfix_uce_rhsbl.html)
yes, see this
set its score to in your local.cf 0:
score X_OSIRU_OPEN_RELAY 0
score RCVD_IN_OSIRUSOFT_COM 0
Steve
James Van Sickle wrote:
Hey everyone
I installed SpamAssassin on my Linux box a few months ago, and I am now
getting all my incoming emails tagged as coming from an Open Relay Mail server
accord
At 09:30 AM 12/16/03 -0500, Jason Lieurance wrote:
Just upgraded to SA 2.61 from SA 2.55 and it appears SA 2.61 is not reading or
following the whole local.cf as it should.
I'd start off by running spamassassin --lint and fix the errors.
# Enable Bayes auto-learning
auto_learn 1
Like
At 11:02 AM 12/16/03 -0500, James Van Sickle wrote:
Hey everyone
I installed SpamAssassin on my Linux box a few months ago, and I am now
getting all my incoming emails tagged as coming from an Open Relay Mail server
according to relays.osirusoft.com. According to people I spoke with at
SpamCop
Hey everyone
I installed SpamAssassin on my Linux box a few months ago, and I am now
getting all my incoming emails tagged as coming from an Open Relay Mail server
according to relays.osirusoft.com. According to people I spoke with at
SpamCop.net, the owner of osirusoft.com started tagging eve
I use e-mail addresses as user names:
/var/log/mail.log:
Dec 16 15:25:13 spam spamd[26385]: connection from mailserver [217.170.3.44]
at port 36585
Dec 16 15:25:13 spam spamd[26623]: processing message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:1002.
Dec 16 15:25:14 spam spamd[26623]: identified sp
Hello,
Just upgraded to SA 2.61 from SA 2.55 and it appears SA 2.61 is not reading or
following the whole local.cf as it should.
I used the same local.cf from 2.55 and it is as follows:
**
# SpamAssassin config file for version 2.5x
# generated
>
> I tried using '[EMAIL PROTECTED]', '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' and
> '@testdomain.com' as the username in our SA database but it
> doesn't work (using 2.61). Not a *huge* problem, we can
> either just use @GLOBAL or just set them in the actual .cf
> files, but it would be cool to have per-domain wh
I'll post my 2 changed reg2rule scripts that I simply hacked around with
Dave's original one. I'll post them with todays bigevil update. Should be
soon. I ran the 122 new domains thru ALL of my ham corpa overnight.
I actually got a penalty for being too rough last night! Honestly, how can
you be
>
> I tried using '[EMAIL PROTECTED]', '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' and
> '@testdomain.com' as the username in our SA database but it
> doesn't work (using 2.61). Not a *huge* problem, we can
> either just use @GLOBAL or just set them in the actual .cf
> files, but it would be cool to have per-domain w
Mark Lowes wrote:
Afternoon all,
I've had a dig through the archives and wiki for a definitive answer
with no success. Is it currently possible to use DNS based domain
blacklists at the moment in SA? (such as
http://www.securitysage.com/guides/postfix_uce_rhsbl.html)
thanks
Mark
Yes
th
I have some php scripts that are almost ready to release. I will notify
the list whne it's done.
Steve
David Hooton wrote:
Hi All,
I have a rather large list of domains that I've collected that I am wanting
to block. Does anyone have a "bulk admin tool" of sorts that I could use to
make SA ru
Hey all!
Saw the following in my logs this morning:
Dec 16 06:39:54 gateway spamd[9846]: Cannot open bayes
databases /var/empty/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock
failed: File exists
Anyone else see this? Thanks!
James
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with
Afternoon all,
I've had a dig through the archives and wiki for a definitive answer
with no success. Is it currently possible to use DNS based domain
blacklists at the moment in SA? (such as
http://www.securitysage.com/guides/postfix_uce_rhsbl.html)
thanks
Mark
--
Mark Lowes <[EMAIL
Fred wrote:
Tim B wrote:
Hey I stumbled over this little gem of a marketeer, looks like they
claim they can bypass any spamfilter. Anyone familiar with this group?
onlinemarketingpros.net
That's funny, their website says in business since 1997, but their whois
shows different (10 days ago ;):
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:18:54 -0500
Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 08:13 AM 12/15/2003, you wrote:
> >On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 07:25:38 -0500
> >Terry Milnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(...)
> > > > whitelist_to[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(...)
> as a further off-list clarific
Hi List,
i was using SA 2.55 for a while and then i had to upgrade it to version 2.60.
I installed it with no problems.
My problem is that when i imported my old databases, their size have
decreased a lot. Don't know why but my bases r very very small then they
were, and a lot of "OLD SPAM's" are
Oddly, the "main" config of SA didn't catch it, but it got caught when I
ran it through on the command line. I think I have something wrong in
my local.cf and I've not had time to find it. It could even be
something as simple as the user SA's running under. Arrgh.
Rubin
On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 2
Martin
Thanks... Found it.
I'm calling spamassassin from a script file driving anomy (from the Advosys
postfix/spamassassin/anomy howto)
That was using -L which I've now removed.
Alan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin,
Jeremy
Sen
on 12/16/03 5:59 AM, Martin, Jeremy at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I don't see a -t in "man spamd" with SA 2.61. -L enables local tests only -
> the manpage says it disables DNS tests only but it also seems to disable
> Pyzor/Razor2/etc.
Yes, you right, it's too early here ;-)
Just make sure you
Running spamassassin rather than spamd at the moment.
Enabled with use_pyzor 1 in my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
Alan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MIKE
YRABEDRA
Sent: 16 December 2003 10:47
To: SPAMASSASSIN
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Py
I don't see a -t in "man spamd" with SA 2.61. -L enables local tests only - the
manpage says it disables DNS tests only but it also seems to disable Pyzor/Razor2/etc.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials.
Become an expert
on 12/16/03 5:36 AM, Alan Munday at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> I installed Pyzor last night (0.4.0 on SA 2.60)
>
> All seems well. I can run it from the command line, have done the discover
> and checked with Spamassassin -D (as root and the mail user) which detected
> pyzor and reported the mail
I installed Pyzor last night (0.4.0 on SA 2.60)
All seems well. I can run it from the command line, have done the discover
and checked with Spamassassin -D (as root and the mail user) which detected
pyzor and reported the mail.
So... This morning I'm browsing through a few hundred of the overnig
Hi,
Sorry if this has been asked before or is in the FAQ, I tried checking the SA Wiki but
didn't see much about SQL in there. I was just wondering if adding domain-specific
whitelists when using SQL prefs has already been requested, or if there are any plans
to implement it in the future?
I
On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 01:52:30AM +0200, cami wrote:
> Hi All..
>
> Are there any plans to store all bayes/awl related tokens etc inside
> a mysql database? Currently i have a server farm with 10 SA dedicated
> servers which are handling just over 350 000 mailboxes.. Wouldnt it
> be better to hav
Ok - I found what I was missing...
Now I read: http://www.spamassassin.org/dist/sql/README
And it doesn't mention that I have to add different options to spamd to use
sql... I feel a little stupid, but I hope this helps those who come after me
;-)
The man for spamd could probably use an edit or
84 matches
Mail list logo
