Oddly, the "main" config of SA didn't catch it, but it got caught when I ran it through on the command line. I think I have something wrong in my local.cf and I've not had time to find it. It could even be something as simple as the user SA's running under. Arrgh.
Rubin On Mon, 2003-12-15 at 20:54, jennifer wrote: > > Actually, it looks like I've got a config problem: When I saved this > > email to disk and ran it as my username on the mailserver, it scored > > 15.3 points. When I ran it through spamc as root, it got 9.6. Yet, > the > > first time it came through, it scored a measley 3.7 points! What > > gives? Have I managed to zork something in my configuration? > > > > Jeeze; spammers give me a headache. > > > > Rubin > > -- > > Rubin Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > RB Technologies > > This spam uses the same technique to get through as the last example you > gave. If you are using the sets I suggested, that should have been > nailed by backhair. If you added those sets and they worked, then added > more rules, it's possible you made an error causing sa to ignore some of > your rules. > > spamassassin --lint to see if you have errors, add -D if you want to see > more of what it's checking > > Jennifer > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials. > Become an expert in LINUX or just sharpen your skills. Sign up for IBM's > Free Linux Tutorials. Learn everything from the bash shell to sys admin. > Click now! http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1278&alloc_id=3371&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Spamassassin-talk mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk -- Rubin Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> RB Technologies
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
