On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 03:31:45PM -0300, Germ?n Staltari wrote:
> Hi list, I have a couple of boxes with SA 2.60 installed. All this boxes
> are RedHat 8, but one with Red Hat 9. All configured the same way and
> updated using RedHat up2date service. The problem is that the scan time
> entry lo
Hello Blake,
Tuesday, October 28, 2003, 7:27:20 PM, you wrote:
BTG> I have two imap folders HAM and SPAM. SA 2.6 moves incoming spam as it
BTG> finds it into SPAM. I have a cron job that runs sa-learn ham/spam
BTG> nightly on these two folders.
BTG> 2 - I have a ton of emails in SPAM. Is
Hi,
I'm hoping to get someone to help me out with intalling, config and
understanding a bit more about SA on this same distro.
If you use MDK9.1+qmail+qmail-scanner+SA2.6 and you have time to talk to me
personally on ICQ, MSN or IRC. Please let me know, I need some help on this
matter.
Thanks in
On Tue, 28 Oct 2003 21:08:14 -0800 Robert Menschel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tuesday, October 28, 2003, 9:00:23 PM, you wrote:
> >> If you have the flexibility, use a different email program. My
> >> personal favorite is The Bat!; Eudora is also very good.
> >> Netscape's Messenger is also exce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Keith,
Tuesday, October 28, 2003, 9:00:23 PM, you wrote:
KCI> Robert Menschel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> There are three categories of "end users" as far as I
>> can tell: 1) Those whose ISP offers SpamAssassin options, and
>> who have full
I have had some very good success with a rawbody and subject test which
looks for
4 or more consonants
followed by 1 or 2 vowels
followed by 3 or more consonants or digits
This is the match:
/[0-9bcdfghjklmnpqrstvwxz]{4,}[aeiouy]{1,2}[0-9bcdfghjklmnpqrstvwxz]{3,}/i
This catches the junk l
Robert Menschel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There are three categories of "end users" as far as I
> can tell: 1) Those whose ISP offers SpamAssassin options, and
> who have full access to their user_prefs file (by web form, FTP,
> or whatever other method), 2) Those who run web-based domains on
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Howard,
Tuesday, October 28, 2003, 11:23:19 AM, you wrote:
HB> A lot of these documents and replies seem to be designed around me
HB> having SpamAssassin on my computer. Instead it is on my e-mail
HB> server.
Mine too. There are three categ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --- Forwarded Message
Date:Wed, 29 Oct 2003 04:43:16 +0100
From:"easynet.nl abuse handling dept." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: SpamTools <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [spamtools] Anyone on the SA list?
If anyone here is actively partici
Title: Message
I have two imap
folders HAM and SPAM. SA 2.6 moves incoming spam as it finds it into
SPAM. I have a cron job that runs sa-learn ham/spam nightly on these
two folders.
2
Questions:
1 - Let's say
sa-learn runs before I can move a false positive email from SPAM to
HAM. T
On October 28, 2003 09:50 pm, Bill Polhemus wrote:
> However, is there not some way to adjust the thresholds at which Auto-Learn
> works? I haven't seen a single Spam yet that was "autolearned," even if it
> has an SA score of 15 or more.
This may be what you are looking for (from "man Mail::SpamA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gator writes:
>I have just set up SA 2.6 and have it working. Now I want to set up a
>spamtrap using a bogus email and have SA reject any other messages that
>are like the ones coming into the spamtrap. Can someone point me to a
>good how-to for thi
Ah, now I understand!
However, is there not some way to adjust the thresholds at which Auto-Learn
works? I haven't seen a single Spam yet that was "autolearned," even if it
has an SA score of 15 or more.
William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas USA
-Original Mes
I have just set up SA 2.6 and have it working. Now I want to set up a
spamtrap using a bogus email and have SA reject any other messages that
are like the ones coming into the spamtrap. Can someone point me to a
good how-to for this?
Thanks - Jack
---
At 06:34 PM 10/28/2003, Jack Gostl wrote:
Is it possible to use wild cards in a white list? For example:
whitelist_from abcd*.bigcompany.com
Yes, See the Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf manpage for details. Basically it
should support any wildcards that a typical unix shell supports when doing
Is it possible to use wild cards in a white list? For example:
whitelist_from abcd*.bigcompany.com
--
Jack Gostl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you
Check for lock files. There seems to be a 20 second timeout if (in my case,
it was the whitelist lockfile) gets stale. Look for minutes/days old
lockfiles, and clean them out.
I had steady 29+second spamd times, turned off all lookup etc, nothing
changed. Snooped in the spamd users dir (I a
Anyone knows what is causing this ? (see below)
I already installed gcc+ locally from gnu.org. Also did a binary
install of make.. created a link to /usr/ccs/bin.. Still no success. I
am stumped. I looked on the web, someone had the same problem, but no
fix.. I am running solaris 8 on an ultra 5
At 03:41 PM 10/28/2003, Dominique Bagnato wrote:
Thank you to let me know how to install spamassassin on Solaris 9.
and where could I get the download ?
www.spamassassin.org
provided you've got perl 5.6.x or higher, you should be able to install as
per the documentation
perl Makefile.pl
Hi,
I have MailScanner and Spamassassin 2.6 , I am getting this error in
mail.log
SpamAssassin timed out and was killed, consecutive failure 2 of 20
And MailScanner stopped , any idea ?
--
Sincerely,
Rezk Mekhael
--
*** Incoming / Outgoing Mail scanned for known Viruses by CLUnet ***
-
I just updated my production SA environment from 2.41 to 2.60 and am
running into load issues. I'm running SA on a 2-node Tru64 cluster. Each
node has 4 gigs of memory and dual 667mHz Alpha CPUs. We process about
150,000 messages per day but, of course, it isn't an even distribution.
We can get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dan Wilder writes:
>On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 08:24:49AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> For the past couple of weeks or so, like most of you, I've seen total spam
>> volume almost double again. At this point, the server in question (dual
>> PII
Which Version of SA?
2.6
Which rules are hitting for that score?
I didnt have debug running before I whitelisted aol.
When I turn it back on, I will keep an eye on it.
header FROM_AOL From =~ /aol.com/i
describe FROM_AOL Hey, this email says from aol!
score FROM_AOL -1.123
cool!
http://www.mercha
Thank you to let me know how to install
spamassassin on Solaris 9.
and where could I get the download ?
Thank you.
-Dominique BagnatoFrom
Home.
>
> Hi,
Right back at ya!
>
> Just a warning, I'm a bit of an SA newbie, so I'm half
> expecting to get
> a bunch of RTFM's back (but I have read the docs too.. maybe just
> missed something...)
>
I've been there!
> I've been using SA with qmail-scanner for about a month now
Which Versi
At Tue Oct 28 18:13:03 2003, Bill Polhemus wrote:
> How can I know for sure if Auto-Learn is functioning correctly?
>
> It does seem to be working for SOME messages but the headers in many of =
> them say:
>
> X-Spam-Status: . autolearn=no
Auto-learning is by definition automated, and as such t
Darryl Snover wrote:
I've just re-made spamassassin, and now, running the spamassassin
--lint results in the error:
razor2 check skipped: No such file or directory Inescure dependency in
connect while running with -T switch at
/System/Library/Perl/5.8.1/darwin-thread-multi-2level/IO/Socket.pm
At Tue Oct 28 06:30:43 2003, wilma wrote:
>
> Thanks everybody! I will use "score FORGED_MUA_IMS 0" in local.cf
> But could someone explain why SA looks to be inconsistent in its
> tests (or maybe I'm missinterpreting):
>
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0
> tests=FORGED_MUA_IMS,HTML_ME
At 02:57 PM 10/28/2003, Howard Brazee wrote:
one word: SSH.
Ssh? I'm too loud? I bet this means something.I haven't worked with
non-mainframe servers ever. It took me a while to figure out how to use
Ultra-Edit to edit my user_prefs file.
SSH is Secure SHell, a remote login protocol.. i
Thanks for reading.
I've been using SA 2.41 for some time now, and upgraded to SA 2.60
with ifspamh1.5, running on a stock qmail system. After upgrading to SA
2.60, the X-Spam headers are not being added to my email. I've added
add_header spam Flag _YESNO_ to my local.cf file, and restarte
I am using 2.55. If the answer is different for 2.60, please answer with
respect to 2.60 as I will be upgrading *very* soon.
I am experimenting with Bayes in a site-wide/gateway configuration. One
thing that I believe is affecting my tests is the external Procmail
whitelist. I find the number o
At Tue Oct 28 15:12:15 2003, Mark Beckwith wrote:
>
> Thanks guys, I ran with -D and got this line:
>
> debug: bayes: DB_File module not installed, cannot use Bayes
Given that DB_File is a pre-requisite for using Bayes, its absence
ought really to log a fatal error to the screen when you try to
> -Original Message-
> From: Keith C. Ivey
Thanks for the reply Keith and sorry for the long dely in my response.
> Larry Gilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > full MY_FULL_OBFU_HTML /[\s>]\w+<[\w\s\/\$&;]{1,6}>\w+/
>
> It seems to me that you'd want to catch the obfuscating
>
-Original Message-
From: Matt Kettler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 12:35 PM
To: Howard Brazee; Spamassassin-Talk (E-mail)
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] White & black lists on server
At 02:23 PM 10/28/2003, Howard Brazee wrote:
>A lot of these documents and replies se
Hi,
Just a warning, I'm a bit of an SA newbie, so I'm half expecting to get
a bunch of RTFM's back (but I have read the docs too.. maybe just
missed something...)
I've been using SA with qmail-scanner for about a month now and it's
been working great. With the default rules and settings, it bl
A lot of these documents and replies seem to be designed around me having SpamAssassin
on my computer. Instead it is on my e-mail server.
Is there a place to look at to find out how someone who has a server based
SpamAssassin can modify the whitelists, blacklists, and give SpamAssassin feed
At 12:06 PM 10/28/2003, Darryl Snover wrote:
I've attempted to issue the command:
spamassassin -t spam.out
without apparent success, as the cursor just sits there afterwards,
and nothing is returned.
First run this to make sure SA is OK with your configfiles:
spamassassin --lint
That should
At 02:23 PM 10/28/2003, Howard Brazee wrote:
A lot of these documents and replies seem to be designed around me having
SpamAssassin on my computer. Instead it is on my e-mail server.
Is there a place to look at to find out how someone who has a server based
SpamAssassin can modify the whitelis
At 2:10 PM -0500 10/28/03, Matt Kettler wrote:
That's pretty much fatally bad, and clearly indicates that your SA
installation did not correctly install all of SpamAssassin.
Specificaly, it looks like part of the baseline files are missing
from /usr/share/spamassassin.
/usr/share/spamassassin
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry for the OT personal comment (sort of), but that *has* to be the
best email address I've ever seen! Thanks for the smile.
Jennifer
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveba
I think my slowness was due to Razor. I disabled it, and now average 3.5
seconds on an 866Mhz RH7.3 box. Never tried pyzor, too much addons to get
working. I set my rbl and the rest to 5 seconds too..
<>
| -Original Message-
| From: Henrik Schmiediche [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent
At 01:07 PM 10/28/2003, Howard Brazee wrote:
I pulled out ultra-edit and FTP'd in auto-whitelist.pag & auto-whitelist.dir
These aren't text files. Where & how can I find and edit my white lists
and black lists on my e-mail server?
First, those are the auto whitelist, aka AWL.. those files are
At 01:13 PM 10/28/2003, Darryl Snover wrote:
>spamassassin --lint
This command results in the following:
Cannot open /usr/share/spamassassin/user_prefs.template: No such file or
directory
Failed to create default user preference file
/private/var/root/.spamassassin/user_prefs
That's pretty mu
At 08:24 10/28/2003 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[[ Dude! Long time, no read... but who could forget an email address like
yours... ;-) ]]
For the past couple of weeks or so, like most of you, I've seen total spam
volume almost double again. At this point, the server in question (dual
PIII-5
At 6:23 PM +0100 10/28/03, Martin Schröder wrote:
On 2003-10-28 12:06:15 -0500, Darryl Snover wrote:
spamassassin -t spam.out
without apparent success, as the cursor just sits there afterwards,
and nothing is returned.
And what's in spam.out?
spam.out isn't created. I eventually have to C
Then it's probably functioning correctly. "autolearn=no" means *that*
message wasn't autolearned.
Bill Polhemus wrote:
How can I know for sure if Auto-Learn is functioning correctly?
It does seem to be working for SOME messages but the headers in many
of them say:
X-Spam-Status: … autolearn=n
How can I know for sure if Auto-Learn is functioning
correctly?
It does seem to be working for SOME messages but the headers
in many of them say:
X-Spam-Status: … autolearn=no
William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas USA
-Original Message-
From: Dan Kohn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 8:09 AM
To: Howard Brazee; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Newbie
This should be a FAQ:
Q. How do I get SpamAssassin to mark as spam all Window patch emails
that include an executable?
A.
At 12:06 PM 10/28/2003, Darryl Snover wrote:
I've attempted to issue the command:
spamassassin -t spam.out
without apparent success, as the cursor just sits there afterwards,
and nothing is returned.
First run this to make sure SA is OK with your configfiles:
spamassassin --lint
This command
If you use maildrop as your MDA (it's Maildir native), you can do
something like this in your maildroprc
MAILBOX="$HOME/Maildir/"
if ((/^X-Spam-Status:.*Yes/))
{
to "./Maildir/.Spam/."
}
> -Original Message-
> From: Francesco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003
I pulled out ultra-edit and FTP'd in auto-whitelist.pag & auto-whitelist.dir
These aren't text files. Where & how can I find and edit my white lists and black
lists on my e-mail server?
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Givebac
At 12:06 PM 10/28/2003, Darryl Snover wrote:
I've attempted to issue the command:
spamassassin -t spam.out
without apparent success, as the cursor just sits there afterwards, and
nothing is returned.
First run this to make sure SA is OK with your configfiles:
spamassassin --lint
That should
On 2003-10-28 12:06:15 -0500, Darryl Snover wrote:
> spamassassin -t spam.out
>
> without apparent success, as the cursor just sits there afterwards,
> and nothing is returned.
And what's in spam.out?
Best regards
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ArtCom
On 2003-10-28 15:07:13 -, Patrick Beard wrote:
> Emails with a total attachment of less than 200k come through fine. Emails
> greater than 200k are corrupted.
Are you sure it's 200k and not 250k?
Look at spamc(1), option -s
Best regards
Martin
--
Martin Schröder, [EMA
I am unfamiliar with QMAIL, we use Postfix. Our Postfix content filter,
the one that sends mail through spamd, examines the returned mail for
'x-spam: yes' and delivers it to a local mail account. If the flag is
not found, it delivers it to the original recipient. Perhaps somethng
like this is poss
My apologies if perhaps this has been covered somewhere, but I can't
seem to find resources...
I'm trying to install/configure spamassassin on a new Mac OSX Panther
server, in conjunction with Communigate Pro and the cgpsa plugin.
the cpgsa plugin appears to be working, but spamassassin doesn't
(Sorry Patrick - I think you'll get this twice)
> How are you passing mail to SpamAssassin?
>
I'm using Exim 3.36 as a relay in our DMZ, so I configured Exim with the
following transport and router;
TRANSPORT:
spamcheck:
driver = pipe
command = spamc | exim -oMr spam-scanned -f '<$sender_addres
Hello,
I have SA 2.60 deployed. I am trying to track down why --- occasionally
--- scanning a message using SA takes a very long time. Currently most
spam is scanned within 2.5 seconds (median) on a 900 MHz Sun system. I
have the following time limits in local.cf:
rbl_timeout 10
dcc_time
We really do think very much alike!
> >> rawbody RM_rb_TITLE //i
> >> describe RM_rb_TITLE Testing for HTML title in emails
> >> scoreRM_rb_TITLE 0.001
>
I have the EXACT same rule for testing! Been using it for a while. I will
posts the stats next week with update. But the rati
Patrick Beard wrote:
After a few more tests it seems that it is nothing to do with pdf
attachments.
Emails with a total attachment of less than 200k come through fine. Emails
greater than 200k are corrupted.
The fact that spamassassin is not logging anything in debug would suggest
its having real
Thanks guys, I ran with -D and got this line:
debug: bayes: DB_File module not installed, cannot use Bayes
Problem solved!
Mark
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 08:23:20AM -0500, Chris wrote:
> I had the same problem for a while.
>
> > No matter what I do, I get something like:
> >
> > ~/Mail >sa-learn
>with a DOC. The 'doc' email comes through with the header tags and a
> 'doc'
> attachment. The PDF email comes through with no SA tags header and the pdf
> is
> now inline ASCII. Neither of these two emails were tagged as spam (which
is
> correct).
> I have tried setting report_safe to zero but no
Hi all. I posted this to -devel as well, but figure I'll reach a wider
audience if I post it here, too. Apologies to those of you who might
recieve it twice.
I'm trying to determine if there's a way to use SQL user prefs (which
makes writing a web-based config tool easier) along with per *virtua
On 15 Oct 2003 08:50:17 +0300, I posted to the spamassassin-talk
mailing list:
> On 14 Oct 2003 00:42:38 -0700, Daniel Quinlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> posted to gmane.mail.spam.spamassassin.general:
>> Another thing that might work well is instead using an eval test that
>> counts non-existent pa
On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 08:24:49AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> For the past couple of weeks or so, like most of you, I've seen total spam
> volume almost double again. At this point, the server in question (dual
> PIII-550 L440GX) is seeing loads as high as 30.00 and beyond, usually
> dur
I had the same problem for a while.
> No matter what I do, I get something like:
>
> ~/Mail >sa-learn --spam --mbox spam
> Learned from 0 message(s) (1927 message(s) examined).
> ~/Mail >sa-learn --ham --mbox /var/spool/mail/mark
> Learned from 0 message(s) (111 message(s) examined).
>
> It always
For the past couple of weeks or so, like most of you, I've seen total spam
volume almost double again. At this point, the server in question (dual
PIII-550 L440GX) is seeing loads as high as 30.00 and beyond, usually
during the day. However, it hasn't rebooted itself that I can recall in
over a
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 06:48:03AM -0800, Patrick Morris wrote:
> At the risk of stating the obvious -- it looks like maties1.sun.ac.za is
> performing network checks, and maties3.sun.ac.za isn't.
You seem to be correct in your assessment. I have skip_rbl_checks 0
now in /etc/mail/spamassassin/lo
Hi I'm using Spamassassin on a Dabian stable system. The version of SA is a
backport from Debian Sid (SA 2.60-2).
Everything is working fine except inbound PDFs attachments appear to be
defanged when this happens there is also no SA tags in the header even
though it is
being handled by the SA-Exim
Hi,
I'm resending this message in the hopes that someone can help who missed it
the first time around.
Anyway, I'm trying to upgrade from SA 2.53 to 2.60 on our mailserver. The
mailserver runs IRIX 6.5 with perl 5.61.
The problem is that I get this error when I try to install SA 2.60:
t/spamd
Thanks everybody! I will use "scoreFORGED_MUA_IMS0" in local.cf
But could someone explain why SA looks to be inconsistent in its tests (or maybe I'm
missinterpreting):
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 tests=FORGED_MUA_IMS,HTML_MESSAGE,
HTML_TAG_BALANCE_BODY,HTML_TAG_BALANC
71 matches
Mail list logo
