I think my slowness was due to Razor. I disabled it, and now average 3.5 seconds on an 866Mhz RH7.3 box. Never tried pyzor, too much addons to get working. I set my rbl and the rest to 5 seconds too.. <<Dan>>
| -----Original Message----- | From: Henrik Schmiediche [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 10:12 AM | To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Subject: [SAtalk] Tracking down slow parts of SA... | | | Hello, | I have SA 2.60 deployed. I am trying to track down why --- | occasionally | --- scanning a message using SA takes a very long time. | Currently most spam is scanned within 2.5 seconds (median) on | a 900 MHz Sun system. I have the following time limits in local.cf: | | rbl_timeout 10 | dcc_timeout 5 | pyzor_timeout 5 | razor_timeout 5 | | All my spam's are scanned in 25 seconds or less, except I | have one sitting there at 68 seconds! How do I track down | what the problem was? | | Is there a way to determine the time it takes (long term) to | do the different network checks so that I can tighten my | timeout values? | | Sincerely, | | - Henrik | | | | | | ------------------------------------------------------- | This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. | Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it | help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help | YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ | _______________________________________________ | Spamassassin-talk mailing list | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk | ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
